Ruger! Please bring back the old smooth grips.

Status
Not open for further replies.

TestPilot

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Messages
976
I just cannot stand the Hogue grips on the GP100.

For 3 inch barrel models, the size is an overkill, and the finger groove position is ridiculous.
 
Little Chicken and Egg there, I'm thinking they closed down because they could not match the price Hogue quoted Ruger.

Grips are personal of course but I consider original Ruger compact grips for 3" GP100's and the full size for 4"+ guns to be some of the best ever made for my hands.

Hogue's feel horrible to me, like I grabbed a handful of playdough and it squished between my fingers.
 
Altamont would make a lot of people happy if they came out with the compact old version of the GP100 grips.

Thankfully they have the standard size GP and SP old style grips available.
 
I think Ruger is just plain out of touch when it comes to some of the combinations found on their guns.

The rubber compact grips are now highly sought after and fetch a pretty penny when they pop up. Hard to imagine paying $60+ for a set of rubber grips, but that's exactly what's happened with the compacts.

chigs-grips-1.jpg
 
I took those off my 3in GP the first chance I had!!

I have the Altamonts on it now, good, but not compact enough for me.

I am looking at grips from Eagle (secret service grips) and the Badger boot grips, having trouble deciding between the two...... any input would help!!:confused:
 
I "deep-sided"those crappy Houges immediately after opening the box replacing them with a used set of The previous standard, Lett's.
 
Hogue's feel horrible to me, like I grabbed a handful of playdough and it squished between my fingers.

Exactly, I'm glad I'm not the only one that doesn't like them. You guys made me feel more normal today.

I'm fortunate enough to have bought a GP100 and SP101 before the switch. What I'd really like to see for the GP is grips like the old S&W 29s had, I found those very comfortable to use, but I do really like the old rubber w/ inserts too.
 
What if many didn't like the old grips? If we're going to change them to suit anyway, what difference does it make? Just about every custom grip design does a better job (than the old grips) of protecting the middle finger from the kicking trigger guard, without really lowering the overall grip.

Shouldn't a short barreled GP100, logically best suited for concealed carry, really have a grip that doesn't catch clothing like rubber does? Maybe they should make some exception for the short barrels and have a nice looking, compact wooden design with a logo.

Ironically, it is the short barreled models, to which one better hold on tight and maybe get some help from a special grip, even with finger grooves and long enough for complete engagement of all the fingers, that most need a soft grip and full length, kinda like what they supply now
 
What if many didn't like the old grips? If we're going to change them to suit anyway, what difference does it make? Just about every custom grip design does a better job (than the old grips) of protecting the middle finger from the kicking trigger guard, without really lowering the overall grip.

Shouldn't a short barreled GP100, logically best suited for concealed carry, really have a grip that doesn't catch clothing like rubber does? Maybe they should make some exception for the short barrels and have a nice looking, compact wooden design with a logo.

Ironically, it is the short barreled models, to which one better hold on tight and maybe get some help from a special grip, even with finger grooves and long enough for complete engagement of all the fingers, that most need a soft grip and full length, kinda like what they supply now
____

How many is "many"? Majority?

It is evident that more people have a distaste for Hogue.

Some people do not like wooden grips.

People only need enough grip length for fingers to hold on. Anyting extending below does not help. It is only a hindrance.

Even if I like the idea of finger grooves, which I absolutely do not, they way Hogue made it makes me wonder "What the hell was Hogue thinking? Did this crap really came from a company that makes grip for a living?"

The groove orientation is made in a way that matches a complete ignorant novice gripping revolver grips low, just like how they grip a self-loader with a huge gap between the web of the hand and the grip tang.

Hougue finger grooves does noting to help me. NONE of the finger grooves matches any of my figers. This is not just about it not fitting me. If a correct high grip is attained, I don't see how that silly groove orientation would fit majority of people since the grooves are not even orientated in that manner.

And, I cannot care less about getting some logo. Plain the better for me. When it comes to guns, looks is a low priority. But, I have decided not to buy many other consumer products thinking,"I would have bought it, if not for that stupid looking logo."
 
Last edited:
Hogue's feel horrible to me, like I grabbed a handful of playdough and it squished between my fingers.

To me it feels like a "Big Foot" grabbed a playdough with a novice like low grip on a revolver.
 
What if many didn't like the old grips?

Seldom have I heard or read a complaint about the old style Ruger GP and SP grips.

Most everything I've seen or heard regarding those grips were positive. My own experience with them has also been positive.


Hogue on the other hand, fitted to either S&W or Ruger as factory grips, seem to get a lot of complaints.

I despised the Hogues that came on a 617 that I previously owned.

S&W has thankfully ditched the finger grove Hogues on most of their current lineup. Hopefully Ruger will do the same soon.

The people at Ruger really should be embarrassed IMO.
 
Well, I for one love the Hogue grip. Maybe because my hands are quite larger than normal. (Differently shaped, also) The only thing I disliked about the Hogue soft one was that my fingers didn't "land" where Hogue thought they should. So, I got the identical Hogue grip, in hard nylon instead, and then shaped it to fit my hand. The GP is so heavy (6" barrel) that I don't need the soft rubber to absorb recoil.
Count me as a happy Hogue customer, several times over.
 
I also found the Hogues to be too big on the GP-100. It's a shame because they work great on the SP-101, but on the GP-100 they were too big even for me except when firing single action.
 
I have 2 Gp-100's, both 3 inchers, and have had numerous 4"er's in the past. I am in complete agreement with those preferring the original grips to the current Hogues. The Hogues are tolerable on the 4" or longer barreled guns but they are one of the dumbest ideas I've ever seen on a 3" that actually makes a really nice carry revolver with the original compacts. They are impossible (or close to it) to conceal due to their length and overall size, unless you are wearing a large jacket. Plus, aesthetically, they make a very elegant looking gun look very WRONG with the huge Hogues. Just my opinion of course.
 
Lots of opinions being passed off as facts or real statistics here (factoids).

When talking about handgun grips, how is it going to be anything other than opinion? The grip that fits me like a glove may feel like a 2x4 to you. No getting around that.
 
The reasons I bought mine were:
the grips, barrel length, & fixed sights.

I like Altamont's Snakeskin Combo.
I may have to upgrade :scrutiny:

gp100.jpg
 
I like the Lett style grip better too. I think the Hogues are too big for even the four and six inch guns, let alone the threes. I have two of the full size grips as spares. When I get around to getting an SRH one of them will go on it with Altamont inserts.
 
I have 2 Gp-100's, both 3 inchers, and have had numerous 4"er's in the past. I am in complete agreement with those preferring the original grips to the current Hogues. The Hogues are tolerable on the 4" or longer barreled guns but they are one of the dumbest ideas I've ever seen on a 3" that actually makes a really nice carry revolver with the original compacts. They are impossible (or close to it) to conceal due to their length and overall size, unless you are wearing a large jacket. Plus, aesthetically, they make a very elegant looking gun look very WRONG with the huge Hogues. Just my opinion of course.

Very logical. I think the story is different when we get away from gun porn and have to actually fire the thing with full up ammo.
 
Ruger switched to the Houge grips because the manufacturer of the old style closed down.
I've read this several times recently, and this makes me puzzled - how could Ruger have put out the 3" GP100 Wiley Clapp variant with the old style grips if their molds were unusable? Sorry, but I'm in the 'Hogues are probably pennies per gun cheaper for Ruger to use and that's why they use them' camp.

I don't like the Hogues much - they're too long in the hand, the bottom finger groove bump is too pronounced (and can't be removed without breaking thru the moldiong), and they need some meat over the backstrip. They cater to folk with small-ish hands, and that's not me. I wish that Pachmyer made their K/L Frame style Compact grips for the GP100.
 
The Hogues do not carry well and are too long. The bottom portion chafes!
 
Lots of opinions being passed off as facts or real statistics here (factoids).
__________________

I think it's a reasonable statement of fact that heavily sculpted finger grooves are more limited as to who they will work well for vs. a non finger grove grip where the shooters fingers aren't restricted to one place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top