WestKentucky
Member
Another thought here aside from the fact that OP broke some type of law by intentionally displaying his weapon as a threat...that put that gentleman within his rights (at least here in kentucky) to shoot or otherwise neutralize (ram with the car) the OP because there was an act which very reasonably made that person feel that their life was in danger.
I'm not saying that this is the case here, but in many similar circumstances Johnny B Good carries a gun for protection, and gets a bit of a false sense of security because now that the good guy has a gun hidden under a coat, in the waistband, without a chambered round because they don't want to shoot their foot (or worse) off. Now Johnny B Good feels like he is bulletproof because some chucklehead messing with him gets shot...true enough...but what many many times has happened is that people let that gun change their actions. They become some warrior in their minds and choose to stand and fight when they should still be looking to duck and cover. In this case the gun may or may not have influenced OP to stay at the car longer or tuck tail and get inside of the office. A gun should not change a person's actions, it should only change the outcome IF the outcome reasonably can come down to only 1 man walking away still breathing. Realistically a person should take a beating before a gun comes into play. If your on the ground not fighting and your still getting kicked in the ribs and head then by all means shoot the guy who you think isn't going to stop until your dead, but until that point gunplay is not justified. Obviously the introduction by your opponent of a weapon is a good reason to make some lead fly, but again, it has to get to that point. DO NOT LET THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE A GUN BECOME A MENTAL STUMBLING BLOCK. You are carrying a variety of tools. Fists, mouth, feet, brain, gun, knife, keys, pepper spray, umbrella, hell even an orange in a walmart sack makes a fair sap...make sure your not using a sledgehammer when your need is for a screwdriver.
I'm not saying that this is the case here, but in many similar circumstances Johnny B Good carries a gun for protection, and gets a bit of a false sense of security because now that the good guy has a gun hidden under a coat, in the waistband, without a chambered round because they don't want to shoot their foot (or worse) off. Now Johnny B Good feels like he is bulletproof because some chucklehead messing with him gets shot...true enough...but what many many times has happened is that people let that gun change their actions. They become some warrior in their minds and choose to stand and fight when they should still be looking to duck and cover. In this case the gun may or may not have influenced OP to stay at the car longer or tuck tail and get inside of the office. A gun should not change a person's actions, it should only change the outcome IF the outcome reasonably can come down to only 1 man walking away still breathing. Realistically a person should take a beating before a gun comes into play. If your on the ground not fighting and your still getting kicked in the ribs and head then by all means shoot the guy who you think isn't going to stop until your dead, but until that point gunplay is not justified. Obviously the introduction by your opponent of a weapon is a good reason to make some lead fly, but again, it has to get to that point. DO NOT LET THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE A GUN BECOME A MENTAL STUMBLING BLOCK. You are carrying a variety of tools. Fists, mouth, feet, brain, gun, knife, keys, pepper spray, umbrella, hell even an orange in a walmart sack makes a fair sap...make sure your not using a sledgehammer when your need is for a screwdriver.