It really depends on what you'd like the end-product to be, what part changes you'll do, and what you will do with the firearm.
If you are putting a .920 bull barrel on it, you will have more stock options in that area. If you want to keep the sporter profile, you may be more limited from what I've seen.
If you want a benchrest rifle, you will want a stock more comfortable for that kind of shooting. A "tactical" stock may not be as comfortable to you in some kinds of shooting. Nor will a dragunov style stock.
But if you want a light-weight firearm that is easier to shoot offhand like you would do hunting, bull barrels are not as optimal. The vertical grip of a dragunov may not be either.
My 10-22 is a "blend" of bench and hunting. It does neither optimally, but does both fairly well. I wanted to retain as much as possible of the original look and profile, but wanted more accuracy.
Mine ended up with a 18" .920 bull barrel with iron sights as well as a see-through optic mount with a 3-9x40 scope. I used an original stock but bored out the barrel channel to 1.00 in order to float the barrel. I cut the barrel band area and reshaped it.
Overall, it is a great rifle, but I have found that it is a tad heavy for hunting. It also is a tad barrel-heavy when shooting free-hand.
But I can handle it.
I hope this helps you get an idea of what you want it to be.
-- John