15 year old traditionalist.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 22, 2011
Messages
115
Im 15 years old and im a die hard traditionalist when it comes to just about everything including firearms. I don't care for glocks or any other polymer gun they feel like blocky toys to me and I can't shoot them very well. I prefer older guns like 1911s, smith and wesson revolvers ( not a big fan of airweights though) and most any other older designs like the colt 1903 pocket hammerless ( you can never go wrong with something JMB designed ) My generation however seems to be caught up on the newer tacticool designs. Is there anyone else from a younger generation who prefers older designs like I do I'd like to know im not alone.
 
My 17 yr old loves my 1911, its the only one he really get excited about shooting, well that and my HD shotgun.
 
I'm 21 (That counts as younger still, right?) And I'm kinda both...I love my Tacti-cool AR-15 and am even picking up a Preban AR15 so I can finally have a collapsing stock. I have an MSAR STG-556 I love piinking with...

But last time I was at the range, despite having both of those I have the most fun competing with my father seeing which one of us could hit a steel gong more times. He had a Mosin Nagant, and I have a K98k. I love my old mil-surps, and I wouldn't even CONSIDER giving them up.
 
Guns with class have a special appeal, that often is missed by the young.

Hats off to you !
 
At 15 I wasn't much of anything when it came to my opinions on aesthetics and class ... These days I only change my mind every month or so.
 
Fear not, Comrade. I am 18 and prefer the older style guns. I am probably the only guy in the range's history to run the tac course with an SVT-40.
 
I'm still youngish (30) and while I like the look of many older/traditional style guns and in the past leaned toward them, I'm at a point now where it's all about function and not form.

Whether it's made of blued steel and walnut or polymer and stainless steel, if it's comfortable in my hands and I can hit with it, I'll probably like it.

I'm easy to please, I suppose.
 
"I prefer older guns like 1911s, smith and wesson revolvers" Musicalgunnut45
My son (16) prefers the 1911, so y'all aint alone.
Somebodies done a good job raisin' ya up, GIVE'EM A BIG HUG.
Thanks for your post , prospects for the future of our nation just took an uptick.
robert
 
I'm in the mid 20's and prefer only the firearms that were classic when my parents were around. I would sell my car before I sold my C&R's.

Give me my steel and walnut over plastic, any time and every time.
 
I'm sure in 75 years someone will be proclaiming their love for good old classic polymer guns rather than whatever whiz-bang materials they have out at the time.

I can see it now:

"The Dielda C9-WTF7 works well, but it just doesn't have soul like a Glock does."

Aesthetics are all in one's head. That doesn't make it not a factor, but it *is* all subjective.
 
Well, 16 years ago, when I was 15, i was a traditionalist. I grew up around firearms, with my father shooting 2-4 matches a week. It was kinda beat into me that a real gun had a rotating cylinder, wood grips and was made in America. The only Automatics that were allowed in the house were built entirely of carbon or stainless steel and they better damn well say Colt on the slide.

I had lots of buddies who jumped on the Glock bandwagon, they would razz me for owning nothing but revolvers and Colt made 1911's (yes, i owned them at that age, my father had given me a couple of his old match pistols). "Revolvers are antiques." "it only holds 6 rounds and it takes forever to reload" "They aren't accurate", they would tell me. I would just reply, "6 rounds is enough to do most jobs, if you practice, reloads are not that slow and its plenty accurate if you know how to shoot with a double action trigger." They just didn't buy it.

As for the auto's, most of them liked my 1911's. The only complaints I would hear were, " its too heavy and it only holds 7-8 rounds". They all loved the trigger and respected the .45ACP cartridge but few of them really cared for the .38 super. They would say "its the same as a 9MM".

At this point in my life ive become more accepting of the new firearms. I understand the real benefits of new materials and ive even purchased a couple polymer weapons, im not against new and improved materials and designs. But when i close my eyes and dream of a beautiful gun, you can bet your butt that its blued steel and wood.
 
I am not 15, but I do prefer traditional designs with firearms. But I don't think you should limt yourself to traditional firearms whatever that might be by definition. As CoRoMo said, Glocks have been around now for almost 30 years.

If they are safe, just about any gun is fun to shoot.
 
I'm 23, and I want a gun that has the features I want, most of which relate to an HD scenario (for me). I think there's a difference between "tacticool" and getting something based on the fact that it will give you an advantage in whatever situation you plan on using the weapon. For example, in an HD situation, a bipod is generally "tacticool" while a flashlight is a very handy feature.

The problem is weeding through features you do need, features you want, features that would just add needless complexity and weight, and features that the manufacturer wants you to think you need.
 
I'm in my early 30's and appreciate the classics. I like leverguns, S&W revolvers, all things 357 and 44 magnum, and classic lines of a bolt action rifle.

I do carry a polymer firearm CC because of the weight savings and capacity advantage.

I have zero interest in the tacti-cool AR15 fad going on right now. They are cool, but I don't really like them and don't want to spend that for a VERY expensive range toy.
 
My first hunting rifle and my first shotgun were both blued steel and walnut stocked. My first handgun was a single action, blued/wood stocked revolver. It was to be my hiking/camping/trail gun. After hunting, camping, and hiking in rain and snow, I thought I'd give some new technological advances a whirl and I now have some very weather resistant tools. Stainless metals, polymer components, and new age coatings. I still have, and use those original long guns and that revolver, but only when I know the sun is going to be shining. I think I also started out as a traditionalist. Heck, I guess I would still like to call myself one. But technology definitely has its benefits.
 
I always find it funny when people talk about liking the "classic" guns while not feeling the same about these "newer plastic tactical guns". Like others have said, Glock has been around for almost 30 years. But the AR 15, the pinnacle of tactical designs, has been around for over half a CENTURY. Its actually older than my parents! (And while I'm not old by any stretch of the imagination, I've been of age to serve in the military for several years.) Guns like the AK, FAL, M14/M1A, G3/HK91 have been around even longer. And don't look now, but most if not all of those guns originally left the factory with wood furniture :what:

I will give you that even being 20, I still like 1911s and other C&R guns, but I would much rather take out my new fangled, "tactical", 17 year old Sig P228. To some I may be robbing the cradle, but this is Alabama, age of consent is 16 :evil:



Edit: This is more aimed at people who think anything more advanced than grandpa's old deer rifle is an abomination. Not those of us who trace the progression of ARs as "traditional: irons only" to "tactical: quad rails, optics etc."
 
Last edited:
Telekinesis, I always understood "tacticool" to mean someone who has an AR-15 with a full rail system, a red dot sight, flashlight, laser, bayonette, foregrip, and bipod, where as you can get a "traditional" AR-15 with just ironsights and a handguard. Maybe back in the day a stock AR was "tacticool".

Then again, I want half the "tacticool" items on my weapon, so...
 
When I was your age, I was a die-hard traditionalist. I inherited a gun collection and 90% of it was collectable/old. I've been the same way ever since. I won't touch any glocks or the like. I enjoy firing them, but will never buy something new/tacticool. I have other older guns that fill the niche just fine. Besides, "they don't make 'em like they used to" holds true on many things I like in addition to guns.
 
How much experiance do you actually have with these "newer" guns? I use to love all metal guns but now I lean a bit more towards polymer than metal. All it took was really just shooting them to embrace them. One thing I've noticed though is that sometimes, some young people about my age (18) and younger seem to embrace the older guns with the intent of being different. Once you get more experiance with the guns of this age, I'm sure you will change your views.

My HD 1100 has a wood stock on it with just an extension added on. Only change I could see myself making to it would be adding a pistol grip buttstock to help recoil when I shoot slugs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top