1876 Chaparrel Rifle

Status
Not open for further replies.

Phonograph

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2011
Messages
1
Some one was aking about the CHAPARREL copy of an 1876 WINCHESTER. I have owned and shot several WINCHESTER rifles in the past, mostly at SASS long range events. I have used them in 40-60 and in 45-60. The weight of the rifle seems to takes most kick out of the recoil and of course the use of Black powder versus Smokeless makes a big difference. I purchased a new CHAPARRel about 2 years ago. It was chambered for 45-60. It had an excellent finish and beautiful wood that fit perfectly. The lever safety was so strong that I could not make the rifle fire because I could not squeeze the lever and grip stronly enough to allow the trigger to operate. I removed the safety. Also, who ever assembles these rifles knows nothing about how to do so. The magazine tube ring that mounts under the barrel just aft of the front sight about 3 inches, is supposed to have what is supposed to be mounted into a dove tail cut in the barrel that is actually called a 'FLY CUT'. Every time I fired the rifle-the magazine jumped out of the catch and went forward.
The assembler did not understand that the tube ring rotated into place and had cut the machined notch to make the mag ring mount like a dove tail. IT did not work. I contacted CHAPARREL and tried to explain the situation. They totally did not understand what I was telling them but sent me a new mag ring which was of no use. What I needed was a new barrel and a mag ring.
I sold the rifle for scrap basically because I did not want to have to buy a new barrel and the gun was unsafe. I could never reach CHAPARREL again.
To fix what I had, the groove where the mag tube mounted would have to been welded and re cut. I am not too up on welding on barrels.
The price on these rifles is great. But the price is not good if the rifle cannot be fired. They all might not be like the one I had. After my experience with their 1876 and my inability to get help-I will not try another of their guns.
 
I've heard a lot of mixed reviews of the Chaparral 1876's. They are beautiful rifles until you realize that the black mineral streaks in the wood grain is painted on. I've still got the hots for one in .50-95 but when I take the plunge, I'll definitely spend a little more and get one of the Uberti versions.
 
CraigC said:
I'll definitely spend a little more and get one of the Uberti versions.

I think they're ALL Uberti. Chaparral is the importer, like Navy Arms and Dixie Gun Works.
It's possible that various order different grades of repros....
I have a Uberti Winchester 1873 saddle-ring carbine I bought 20 years ago which has been flawless. These reports on the 1876 trouble me as I have always had high regard for Uberti products.
 
NOOOOOOOO, Chaparral's are not Uberti's. Far as I know, Chaparral is the manufacturer. Not an importer like Dixie Gun Works, Cimarron, EMF or Navy Arms.
 
Last edited:
There is some word that parts are manufactured by an Italian company called Palmetto and the involvement of ex-ASM employees. Their website says they are assembled at Charter Arms in the US. Uberti does not make them. You can get Chaparral `76's from CDNN for $600 but Ubertis from any importer are gonna be $1200-$1400.
 
They are very definitely not Ubertis.
Chaparral was the maker & the US company is loosely affiliated with the Charter Arms/Hi-Point group.
 
Not anymore and the guns CDNN have are not assembled by Charter Industries.
Chapparal no longer imports these rifles due to the issues they experienced with them.
The CDNN guns are better assembled than the Charter guns but once they are gone, they are gone.
 
I have seen very few good reviews of the Chaparral 1876 reproduction other than in gunzines with advertising to sell.

If you just must have one of the old anchors (one of the heaviest and maybe the worst balanced sporting rifles I can think of) there is a Uberti version which we can hope for better quality out of.
 
I have seen very few good reviews of the Chaparral 1876 reproduction other than in gunzines with advertising to sell.
I have seen A LOT of online how-to's, just to get them to shoot. Some folks had been wanting an 1876 repro for years and were willing to do anything to make them work.

They are heavy but I find them to be wonderfully balanced. But then, one of my favorite rifles is a 24" 1873 Deluxe Sporting Rifle and it is not exactly a featherweight either.
 
On,
The sample I had was sent from that Charter/Hi-Point/Chaparral conglomeration.
Dunno what the current relationship is.
Gun was still junk. :)
Denis
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top