Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

1903 colt

Discussion in 'Firearms Research' started by Stitchy, Jan 25, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Stitchy

    Stitchy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2013
    Messages:
    1
    Hi I am new to the site. I can't find anything about my issue. I bought a 1903 hammer less colt 32 rimless. When I bought it the guy gave three boxes of ammo all 380. I said its a 32 but don't mind the ammo, he said no it shoots 380. The magazine says 380 the slide says 32 rimless. The gun looks brand new and I am happy either way. I just can't find any evidence of someone making a 32 into a 380 I've heard it could be done going 380 to 32. Any info I would appreciate thank you.
     
  2. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    48,343
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    News to me and I own more than one 1903 and 1908. The firearms are of different sizes and the chambers and barrels are too different.

    I don't see how you'd fit a .380 barrel into a .32ACP frame/slide.
     
  3. AlexanderA

    AlexanderA Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3,056
    Location:
    Virginia
    The magazines are very similar (the easy way to tell the difference is that the .380 magazine has 6 holes while the .32 has 7). But I just checked the guns that I have, and the .380 magazine is a hair too wide to go into the .32 frame, while the .32 magazine goes easily into the .380.

    If you have a magazine that's marked .380, that probably means that the frame is .380. Maybe someone swapped a .32 slide/barrel onto a .380 frame, although I'm not sure that can even be done. You need to measure the chamber and bore.
     
  4. WardenWolf

    WardenWolf member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Messages:
    5,884
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Well, it would certainly be theoretically possible for the .380 and .32 pistols to be exactly the same except for the barrel, bushing, and minor magazine changes. After all, the Tokarev, a gun based on the 1903, manages it with both its original .30 caliber round and the 9mm Luger round. I don't know if Colt did this, but I do know it's technically possible they made it with completely interchangeable parts, even keeping the slide the same and just stamping it differently.
     
  5. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
  6. mike@gunshopps.com

    mike@gunshopps.com Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    5
    Location:
    Paola
    All good answers

    The quickest way you can fit one .32 in a .32 magazine but you can't get a second in. Also look around the online stores and get a little tin teardrop shape bore gauge. Put it in the end, wallah (sp) the magazine tells all without a gauge.
     
  7. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,706
    The magazines are not interchangeable, which is why Colt marked them with the caliber. The earlier guns had different frames so a .380 mag wouldn't fit in a .32 frame, but Colt later made the mag wells the same, so the .32 mag is a little loose in the frame even for a .32 pistol. The extractors are also different.

    Jim
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page