22 short why not 22lr

Status
Not open for further replies.
Keep in mind that all Match .22LR should be subsonic. Match in much of the world means 50 meters and many "Hi-Speed" .22LR would drop from supper sonic to subsonic at about 40 yards and wobble slightly. Even the Hyper velocity do this around 100 meters.

Most American .22LR Match stuff used to run around 1040 FPS at sea level 70F and 70 % (used to be called standard weather, would be nice to live where ever that is standard weather, eh?) Euro stuff ran around 950 FPS.

In high school we used the old Super-X copper wash for training at 50 feet because it was still super sonic when it splattered on the plates. The Target and Match Ammo was noticably quieter without the sonic crack.

This was all Round Nosed 40 grain solid .22LR in match rifles.

BTW the ISU 50 meter prone target had a nine ring smaller than a dime or old 50 pfinig piece and shooting less than 90 from unsuported prone was considered shamefull. So you see accuracy was more important than velocity,

,22 Short also came in two varieties, Standard velocity and high velocity. Again the Standard velocity was what got used in guns like the .22 Short version of the High Standard or the Walther turning target guns or a host of target revolvers used at 25 meters or less. High Velocity shorts were for hunting and such and while generally still subsonic seemed louder and more likely to be found with Hollow point pullets in my day. In fact a buddy that had to carry a Beretta 950 to keep concealed at his job had trouble finding in the 1980s High Velocity short solids, his choice for Self Defense being penitration over expansion in such a small round.

of course actually there was a third choice in .22 Short that was hard to find....Gallery Special that used a fragmenting pressed wax and clay bullet. State side I never saw them out side fairs and carvivals (and never failed to use some up when I did, Carnie tricks or not, guess I was a good mark for those guys) in Europe I saw folks using them on indoor ranges and the most interesting use was in a High Standard rapid fire .22Short pistol that had a suppressor and actually cycled the things! The owner was a clock repair man....as in city clocks of the 1500's up. He claimed most clock issues were pidgeon related. First thing he did was smoke a cock tower machine room, then block any holes he found then shoot down pidgeons that had stayed through the smoking with those Gallery Specials. He said the bullets shattered on 500 year old stone walls without ricochets. Most of his actual "repair" work consided of placing a coin on one lever weight or some such and pushing it about to get things balanced. He said some clocks had coins about as old as the original clockwork on various structures. The pistol also worked fine at the turning target game with standard shorts where I had difficulty detirmining where most of the noise came from, the action cycling, the report, or the bullet slap into the back stop. He seemed to make a good living and finance his shooting hobby quite nicely.

Both Shorts and Longs used a 29 grain bullets and my understanding was the long in Black Powder days was just a way to get what we now consider High Velocity short speeds.

Typically CBs and CB longs use 29 grain bullets and the only reasons for the CB Long are for use in a LR chamber to prevent that built up ring we were discussing and to get the bullet closer to the lead of the rifling to allow less free bore and theroretically better accuracy.

...and I am tired of typing.

-kBob
 
Thanks lysander, 1975 was a while ago. I was going on what my coach in Germany at that time told me. He made jokes at every opportunity about Americans trying to do everything too fast.

Used mostly RWS as Walther gave a bunch to the club free in exchange for honest reviews I was told. Beside the club Walther ISU 50 rifle and GSP/OSP I shot Running game DSB centerfire with a Walther supplied "Running Boar" rifle in .308. (got to say I sort of liked it more than .22 or current air rifle) I shot in a national postal for for the club in a small bore (under 6 mm ) hunters rifle centerfire one year with a Sako belonging to a club member and for a couple of years after returning to the states got called a liar for saying I shot a .223 chambered Small Action Sako! I did not do well at turning targets and was awful at free pistol using my coach's Hamerelli. My coach at the club worked for Anshutz and a couple of guys worked for Walther. One old fellow that seemed more intersted in socializing and beer than shooting appearently worked for Kreighof. Being stationed in Neu Ulm across the Danau from Ulm was something I would have appreciated better five or six years later. 20-ish year old brains are not fully formed!

-kBob
 
kBob noted a while ago::

The Ruger Standard 4 inch barreled fix sighted semi auto is Just That.

Actually the Mark 1 was the target model of that pistol with adjustable sights. Fix sighted models never got called Mark 1s until the Mark II came along.

Thanks for mentioning that. I'll speak of my Ruger Standard and folks think, "Oh, he means the Mark 1."

Nope.

Minor pain in the patootie when that happens 'cause half the time they think I'm a noob idiot.

Well, I'm an idiot, but at least not a noob.

Incidentally, the only easy way to single-load shorts and CB caps in the ,22 Ruger auto pistols is in a zero gravity environment. You park the cartridge in space, then slowly back the open firearm over it so the round slips into the chamber.

Terry, 230RN
 
Last edited:
Back to the range today. brought the chrono, the Model 67 Winchester with its 27" barrel, and various brands of 22 short, and 22 Long Rifle including some CCI Quiet .22, ( 22LR), among other things. It was surprising to discover that the exact same ammo out of the same box runs slower out of a 27" barrel than it does from a 5.5" barreled revolver. Still have the velocity averages from last week written down and they are also posted earlier in this thread. For example; 22lr, 22 Blazer 40 gr. bullet that averages 1164 fps from the single six only averages 1059 fps out of the Model 67. Wolf Match Target 22LR - 937 fps / Single 6 vs. 894.4 fps Model 67. CCI 22 Short runs 1059 from the Single 6 vs. 970.8 fps in the Model 67. The Polish made 22 Short Match ammo gets 798 fps from the Single 6 vs. 758.2 from the Model 67. I was expecting more velocity from the longer barrel of the rifle but I assume that with such a small amount of powder being burned, the bullet is actually slowing down a bit from friction, having already consumed all the powder, in the longer barrel before it reaches the muzzle. Which would mean a 22 rimfire bullet ( either a 22 Short or a 22 Long Rifle), reaches its highest velocity in the first few inches of barrel and begins to slow down after that. That's my guess..... What say you ?. Now I'm beginning to understand why my dad spoke highly of 22 Shorts fired from that same gun back in the latter 1930's. Along with other old timers I heard as a kid.
 
Back to the range today. brought the chrono, the Model 67 Winchester with its 27" barrel, and various brands of 22 short, and 22 Long Rifle including some CCI Quiet .22, ( 22LR), among other things. It was surprising to discover that the exact same ammo out of the same box runs slower out of a 27" barrel than it does from a 5.5" barreled revolver. Still have the velocity averages from last week written down and they are also posted earlier in this thread. For example; 22lr, 22 Blazer 40 gr. bullet that averages 1164 fps from the single six only averages 1059 fps out of the Model 67. Wolf Match Target 22LR - 937 fps / Single 6 vs. 894.4 fps Model 67. CCI 22 Short runs 1059 from the Single 6 vs. 970.8 fps in the Model 67. The Polish made 22 Short Match ammo gets 798 fps from the Single 6 vs. 758.2 from the Model 67. I was expecting more velocity from the longer barrel of the rifle but I assume that with such a small amount of powder being burned, the bullet is actually slowing down a bit from friction, having already consumed all the powder, in the longer barrel before it reaches the muzzle. Which would mean a 22 rimfire bullet ( either a 22 Short or a 22 Long Rifle), reaches its highest velocity in the first few inches of barrel and begins to slow down after that. That's my guess..... What say you ?. Now I'm beginning to understand why my dad spoke highly of 22 Shorts fired from that same gun back in the latter 1930's. Along with other old timers I heard as a kid.
Interesting stuff at http://www.ballisticsbytheinch.com/22.html
Look at the "real world weapon" chart.....some barrels of equal length show a significant difference.

I have a friend with a CZ 455 that had a bore so tight that CB's wouldn't make it out. Took a few shots before he realized why there were no holes on paper.:D
 
Thanks for that link.... Real interesting stuff. I don't know why those CZ-455's have tight bores but I'm glad the guys in the shop I got mine at back in 2017 talked me into buying a 17 cal. cleaning rod. At first I thought they were kidding me. Now that I think about it I'm glad I never tried anything less than 22LR in it.
 
Why would anyone want to shoot .22 Shorts? Are we at that point in available inventory?
 
Please do leave those expensive and wimpy shorts on the shelves. More for me...

Spread the word far and wide!!
 
Thanks to this thread and my chronograph data I might just try some 22 shorts when squirrel hunting this fall. Now I know why my dad always liked them for small game. They pack more punch than I had thought. Never took a squirrel with any rimfire other than 22LR. Gonna have to change that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top