FWIW, people wiser than I (meaning above my rank)
Don't know where you work, but at the plant I worked at, the higher the rank, the dumber the person was the rule. ROFLMAO!
NAAs are crap...look nice on the outside, true, but are way too fragile/third-world "craftsmanship" on the inside. Avoid them. Highly unreliable for carry and not durable for long-term practicing.
No, .22LR ammo is just as reliable as centerfire ammo...if you use a quality 22LR ammo. If there even is a theoretical difference, it's negligible in real life.
1) I wonder if you've fired much .22.
2) I wonder if you've ever even seen a NAA mini. I have owned one for 20 years plus and it's been fired extensively. It's built of stainless, well finished, and the quality is like a little Rolex. Ain't like the .22 is very stressful, either. And, Utah is a third world country????
My NAA is NOT my primary. It's a single action that's very slow to reload as it requires pulling the cylinder pin which, if you drop it, you're out of action. However, I always have this little gun on me. It's so easy to carry, I never leave home without it. I've used it for all sorts of vermin, both edible and not. Literally tens of thousands of rounds have been fired through this tiny little revolver.
One of the biggest POSs I ever owned was a Beretta in .22 short.. I could NOT make that thing feed with anything I tried. I bought it from a friend who got it new and couldn't make it work. He was not very gun knowledgeable so I figured maybe he wasn't using good ammo or something, but I couldn't do anything with it, either, and sold it for a 25 dollar profit at a gun show to a dealer......sucker. I ain't sayin' all Berettas are junk. But, just based on my experience, I'll take the NAA, thanks!