3 Months of confusion ... what to get?

Status
Not open for further replies.

protean

Member
Joined
May 15, 2005
Messages
5
Location
AL
Going for my first rifle or carbine, hopefully within the next 2 weeks. I have come to the point where I am just not sure what I want to get ... pistol caliber carbine (9mm, .40, .45), 223, 308, or even .22 or 17HMR.

I have a few handguns that I trust my life with and in home defense would probably grab one of these first, so the "I want it for home defense" arguement kind of goes right out the window. Besides, I live in an apartment and over penetration would be a huge concern with a rifle.

What do I really want it for? Good question ... Mainly for "plinking" or just fun at the range (I hit the range every Monday morning with my pistols). The range I am a member of has several range areas, from 12 yards out to 200 yards. They do host competitions, though I am not so sure I would be interested in competing ... who knows though, I may change my mind later.

The thought of rapidly unloading 30 rounds into a target at short to medium range is really appealing. Carbine is obviously the way to go here ... even a pistol caliber carbine would be fun here.

The "cool" factor of a rifle would obviously add to the fun (yeah, yeah, I know what you are thinking ... no one admits this, most folks think it. But at least I am honest). I love the look of modern rifles and carbines ... especially the pretty-far-out-of-the-norm look (CX4 and HKs, M4s, etc).

Not really interested in pump/bolt action.

The thought of very well placed single or quick double shots at extended medium range (100-200 yards) is also very appealing - this would probably eliminate the pistol caliber carbines (how accurate could a 9mm be at these ranges with factory "plinking" rounds? ... I could be wrong). This would obviously require me to add a low power scope later (after I became very familiar with the rifle's stock sights, of course).

I am pretty limited in my choices due to my budget ... roughly $600, but read on ...

Items I have considered

Beretta CX4 (9mm variant) - definately has the first two criteria met, but anthing past 50 yards I would think this carbine would disappoint me. This would be well within my budget and factory 9mm ammo is way cheap for range use.

Various AKs/clones : Not real fond of the AK design asthetically speaking, though everything I have read, can be very enjoyable as range rifles. Not real sure on accuracy - so many varying opinions to be found. Several of these are well within my budget and ammo is cheap. 7.62 = shoulder pain??

AR-15s/clones : So many brands and varieties of each ... could definately meet all of my criteria except for my budget. If I went with an AR, I would probably have to piece it together over the next month or two (lower first, then upper, etc), or I would have to put a complete rifle on layaway for over a month if I wanted to end up with something decent that I wouldn't want to "upgrade" or trade in 6 months. Another problem comes in deciding which brand(s), which parts, which "extras", and would I prefer a 16, 20, or 24 inch?

Mini-14 : Again, so many mixed reviews on these rifles, not sure if I would be happy with one of these. Complete rifle with the goodies I would want (dragunov composite stock/bed, etc) would price it a little outta my range I think.

I saw a few HK53 and 91 clones in 223 that got pretty good reviews and I liked these, but it seems they are out of my budget again ($1200-ish).


Anything I have overlooked? Please don't bash me for the "cool" factor thing, at some point or another, I bet you were there once yourself :neener:
 
Well you really need a 22 rifle. Maybe the Walther G22. Now that is a cool looking rifle.
http://www.gunsmagazine.com/F12.html

Not the greatest thing past 100 yards, but it will shoot that far. Make for more of a challenge. The cheap 22 ammo make it easy to shoot as often as you want. Low recoil and noise help with that too. Fits your budget price as well. Leaving some money for accessories.

My other suggestion if the 22Lr doesn't do it for you is the Keltec Sub2000 in 9mm.
http://www.kel-tec.com/prod03.htm

I have one of these, and repeated hits on a pie plate at 100 yards is pretty easy. A rifle that folds into an 11x16 inch space is plenty neat. Uses Glock, S&W or Beretta mags depending on which you choose for yours to be set up for using. . It is even cheaper than the Walther. Though ammo will cost more.

Both of these are unusual and cool. But I strongly suggest the 22 (though I haven't shot the G22) as you can just shoot one so much in that caliber because of the economy and low recoil.

BTW, 100 yards with the 9mm carbines is pretty easy. I have the Keltec and a Ruger PC9. Both work very well to 100 yards. Even 150 yards isn't too bad though you are getting significant drop in trajectory by then.
 
Get an M1 Carbine!

If you don't mind the no-so-modern looks of the Mini-14, you should take a look at an IAI M888 or an Auto Ordnance M1 Carbine, both are clones of ww2 M1 carbines. This is a great rifle for plinking because you can shoot accuratley out to 100 or 150 meters and not have to worry about too much over-penetration that might be associated with a .223 or .308. Also it has about the same recoil of an AR15, making it very controlable. Ammo is also way cheaper than feeding a finicky AR or a .308.

A very very good condition M1 Carbine can be had in either surplus or reproduction form for $500 or less. There are many accessories for it, even a picitiny rail system that replaces the handguard.
 
You may want to look at the KelTec SU16 in one of its variations. Seems to have a lot going for it in meeting your criteria. I have not fired one, but looked one over before picking up my Rock River AR15 (for quite a few dollars more).

Why not get better range and firepower in your transition to a long gun?
 
rust collector : The more I think about it, the more I am swayed toward the 223. Ammo is fairly inexpensive in bulk, and, I am sure in time if I don't start out with an AR, I will probably end up with one at some point. Why not start with a caliber that I will more than likely move to in the future anyway?

coylh: Excellent discussion on penetration, especially the last entry posted by Sleuth. Definately something to look into and try to find more conclusive hard data. Currently keep my carry piece full of .40 Hydra-Shok (at the recommendation of local law enforcement) ... time to look into something different I think and thoroughly test for myself.

mattw: The M1 definately has its niche, however, I just don't think I am part of that. I considered the mini-14 due to the HiCap and the ability to easily trade out the stock for several available aftermarket pieces. Though, if I did start collecting, an M1 would be nice to have.

esldude: While an excellent plinker for my needs, cost of ammo, etc, I think I want to stay away from .22 as I would really like a nice 100+ yard rifle mixed in with everything. By your suggestions, the 9mm carbines would be more to my liking. I'll check out the KelTec in a bit Thanks :)


Thanks for all the suggestions :) This is a really great community and I am glad I found it. I think in the long run, I would be best off putting a decent Bushy or Rock on layway (been leaning toward this over the last week or so).

With this being said, how does barrell length really affect your shot under 300 yards? My dilemna now is options (A2/A3/FlatTop, barrel length, free-floating handguards ...) and brand (RRA, BushMaster, OlyArms, DPMS, etc)
 
Last edited:
Just an idea

You said you had been thinking about the AK rifles, but didn't know about 7.62x39? Get an SKS! Handy, cheap, sweet looking, customizable (not that I'd want that for mine :D ), cheap ammo, good accuracy (do not read this as a tack-driver, it's not...but I've gotten 2" MOA benchrested at 150 yds with my Yugo, 55 outta 60 headshots on a silhouette). For the price you have, you could get 2 or 3 of them--keep one stock, mess with the other two--plus a case or so of ammo, and have $$$ left over--always a plus :) . So, the SKS/AK's might not be asthetically pleasing, or not the most accurate rifles on the planet....but they're fun and cheap.

However, if you must have a .223, I'd probably suggest the SU-16 (like so many other wise people have suggested ;) ), or an AR-180B to sidestep the whole direct-gas system of the AR15. Just some ideas, good luck choosing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top