Post from above:
"Shooting sheep in Mongolia doesn't prove anything about a caliber that shooting goats in the Rockies doesn't. It just means you're in Mongolia."
Whatever you say is fine with me. I've never hunted sheep in Mongolia, and you didn't say if you have either. But it seems reasonable to me that it's wise to recognize the experience of hunters who have and acknowledge their choices of rifles and calibers. But apparently you don't see this way. Again, fine with me. But, come to think of it, can you name more experienced hunters than the few I did? Perhaps they will have useful imput about .300 Wby Mag. I don't even have a .300 Wby Mag, never owned one, and only shot one a few times, so don't have a dog in this fight. Do you? Come to think of it, you mentioned Keith and O'connor, and others, earlier. But what do they have to do with subject of .300 Wby? Is there something about them and .300 Wby that bugs you? Or should I not ask?