.308 AR vs. M-14

Status
Not open for further replies.
no_problem, I am a huge .30 cal admirer, but have you seen what a soft point .223 does to man and medium sized game?

Actually, yes. I killed my first deer with a Mini-14 and a 55 gr JSP at a range of about 40 yards. I don't know what all the hoopla is about, because nobody was impressed, including the deer. The bullet entered the front of the chest, penetrated nearly lengthwise through the right lung, went through the diaphragm, the liver, stomach, and small intestine, then exited in front of the left hind leg. The deer non-nonchalantly walked behind a tree and started at me. I've shot deer with M67 pattern 7.62x39 FMJ from an SKS and got better results, actually. And that is why I remain a .30 caliber fan.
 
I killed my first deer with a Mini-14 and a 55 gr JSP at a range of about 40 yards...

I have seen deer run when hit with all manner of cartridges, including the .308. I've likewise seen them drop where they stood. Historical reading indicates that humans also have a distressing tendency to not reliably fall down when shot with anything man-portable.
But remember, we're playing The All Things Have Gone To Smash game in this thread. In that situation, I doubt there'll be much deer hunting getting done by our intrepid OP, or anyone else for that matter. There won't be any deer to hunt relatively quickly and firing a gun will attract all sorts of unwanted attention from other "dangerous wildlife" in the area. Their plans may include backshooting you for your gun and other belongings, if not just for the deer if you were actually lucky enough to bag one. It's a great survival enhancer in such a situation to simply go unnoticed.
The gun, therefore, is primarily for defending himself against other humans. If he's smart, our OP will feed himself from small creatures that can be trapped, dug, snared, or otherwise harvested with as little noise and fuss as possible. That includes insects. This is pretty basic survival/evasion stuff like they teach in the military.
Since the gun isn't going to be used to down a moose, it doesn't matter whether it can do so with one, clean sporting shot. What matters is whether it is reliable and accurate enough to let him effectively defend himself against hostile people. It's already been wisely and accurately stated upthread that looters and other predators generally don't take the time to ask what cartridge you are shooting, they move on to easier targets. That's one more reason why neither of the OP's choices impress me. A large rifle that weighs over 10 pounds and that uses ammo where 200 rounds will weigh an equal amount more is like tying an anvil around your neck as you try to move quietly and unobtrusively to some supposedly better, safer place.
 
I did list a lot of different calibers......and in all of that I forgot the trusty 12ga shotgun.

My list was an ideal list to keep in a survival "hut". If I had to run out the door forever, I'd be taking the 12ga and if possible a 22LR handgun. A little more seconds to escape I'd also grab an AK47 with as many magazine that would still fit in my ammo pouch filled with 12ga shells and 22LR birck.

I also tend to think that if it all came down to that drastic living, I'd be rigging my "hut" for explosive destruction right upon exiting, to keep that stash from being used by the invader(s).
 
I'm with MTMilitiaman on this one

I completely agree with everything MTMilitiaman said in his post on this thread. There's not really much to add to that. He and his family will be the survivors along with me and mine. The rest of you carry them little popgun pistols and poodle shooter rifles all you want. :scrutiny:

Molon Labe,
Joe
:D
 
I have seen deer run when hit with all manner of cartridges, including the .308.

So have I. But I've never seen an animal seemingly unaffected by a gunshot. I've shot deer with a FMJ from an SKS. It did more damage than the .223 JSP, and the deer at least knew something bad had happened. Even deer shot with arrows run, and arrows typically create larger permanent wound channels than the .223 caliber JSP.

Another difference is that larger calibers with expanding ammunition leave blood trails.

I've never seen a deer so seemingly unphased. I didn't know if I had even hit it until it finally dropped its head and started coughing up blood. Then it stumbled out from behind the tree, collapsed, and slid down the hill a little ways. I've seen a lot of deer shot with .30-06s and several of them shot with my 7 Mag, and every one of them has left enough of an impression on the animal that it at least tried to run away.

Other people can have their poodle shooters. I've seen enough stuff shot with them and larger cals to know there is a difference, and even disregarding differences in the platforms, I trust the 7.62 a lot more.

I did list a lot of different calibers......and in all of that I forgot the trusty 12ga shotgun.

All the people complaining about ammo weight for the 7.62 and someone wants to carry a weapon with heavier ammunition but less range and utility?
 
He and his family will be the survivors along with me and mine. The rest of you carry them little popgun pistols and poodle shooter rifles all you want.

I'll chalk this up to an attempt at humor or, perhaps, simple hyperbole. I truly hope that you are not so ill-advised as to believe that surviving even a transient crisis hinges on caliber choice.
 
But I've never seen an animal seemingly unaffected by a gunshot.

One data point does not establish a trend.

I once saw a deer get shot 5 times, all of the wounds non-survivable, with a variety of rounds in the .308 or better class. I was one of the drivers who pushed it into the shooters. I still had to track it, and when I found it, it was still kicking trying to get to its feet and run some more. I finished it with a head shot from a .38. It was so shot up that I had to force one of the shooters to tag it and take it home. What does the incident prove? Not much, same as your anecdote.
 
ut I've never seen an animal seemingly unaffected by a gunshot. I've shot deer with a FMJ from an SKS. It did more damage than the .223 JSP, and the deer at least knew something bad had happened

Are you referring to one of my post? Did I post a link to the pics of a .223 55 grain SP on a deer shot quartering? If not. Here it is again.


http://homepage.mac.com/jeremy16/deer_hunting/December2007/Photos.html

oh. and this deer knew he was shot.
 
okay.

i was just wondering. Because as you can see a .223 SP does A LOT of damage to tissue, and has plenty of penetration and bone breaking potential.

If your FMJ did that much damage you must have had a yaw or a fragmentation of the bullet.
 
Guys,


This thread is drifting far from its original question and developing into another caliber thread.

I am partially to blame for daring to mention that I have an M4-gery that I carry when I don't feel like carrying my LR-308. Gasp... I also have a 10/22 that I carry sometimes as well.


As mentioned earlier in this thread, one data point does not develop an accurate picture.

If so, we are in a world of hurt. As much as it disturbs me, .22 rimfire has taken more deer that any of us would be comfortable with.


While caliber is something to consider, the man is far more important than the tool. This thread has elements of SHTF and "survival" in it. Guys, SHTF isn't about being perfect. It is about working with what you have. The MAN makes the tool work.

After all, at some time man somehow managed to take down medium-sized game with a stick that has a sharp rock tied to it.

I'm certain that Cro-magon man didn't sit around the fire discussing the ballistics, wound channel, and terminal performance of their little sharp stick. No. They cooked the meat.


Our desire for absolute perfection is overkill.

My grandfather always stated that 30-30 probably has taken more deer than any other round in the US. I'd wager that this is still the case. And yet, it is not my favorite caliber.


Years ago, people around here would scoff at using a .243 Winchester for taking deer. Yet, every year, I am seeing more and more people using it as their primary rifle. And every year, I am seeing good results with it.

As I've mentioned earlier, we have some around here using both .223 and 22-250 with good results on deer. We have to remember that we are not talking about using FMJ rounds on deer. Not only is it illegal here, but it would not be a fair evaluation. The fact is that a 80 grain .223 with expanding bullet is NOT the same as a 55 grain FMJ.


So am I advocating a smaller caliber over a 30 caliber round? Not at all. I have both.

We have to remember that all "mid-sized" game is not created equally. A Michigan Whitetail looks like something on steriods. A Florida deer looks like a small dog. Both are "Mid-Sized" game. Here in MS, ours are somewhere in the middle of those. While some could use something like 300 Win. Magnum on a deer, doing so around here would destroy too much meat.

Part of being the "man" effectively is knowing and understanding the capabilities of and limitations of a particular "tool."


Even so, there are no guarantees. I personally have never had a deer run in 30 years of hunting whitetails. I consider this somewhat of a combination of skill and luck. At the same time, I've had to track MANY deer with vitals hits using a 30-06 for friends and family members.

This past year, my father LOST a deer he shot with a 30-06 broad-side at 65 yards using 180 grain Remington Cor-Loct. The deer hit water and we lost the trail. Nothing is quite as fun as wading through a swamp at 10:00 PM hoping to find a blood trail exiting a Slue.


Years back, I had to follow a blood trail for 1.5 miles on an eight-point shot by my mother. When we got to the deer, it was a solid shoulder hit and both lungs were hit as well as the heart.


So, you just don't know.


I'll end with this...



He and his family will be the survivors along with me and mine. The rest of you carry them little popgun pistols and poodle shooter rifles all you want.


If this isn't a joke, it is the most asinine statement ever made on a "SHTF-leaning" thread.

I could explain it, but I (and others) have done so several times before. Besides, it would take charts and graphs to fully appreciate.


I'll take a potable water suppy over choice of caliber any day.



-- John
 
I'm certain that Cro-magon man didn't sit around the fire discussing the ballistics, wound channel, and terminal performance of their little sharp stick. No. They cooked the meat.

Unfortunately Cro Magnon man became extinct being replaced by Neanderthal man because they worked in groups with better sticks. Plus they were more attractive to the opposite sex. :uhoh:

It really doesn't matter what you protect yourself with. Pointy sticks, arrows, rocks, fists, all work. I really don't buy into SHTF philosophy simply because anything could happen at anytime w/o warning. You could have all sorts of guns, ammo, or food stocked in a place you think is "safe". But if it suddenly fall off the face of the earth it does no good. Besides, I don't think I would be that interested in being survivor either. :(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top