.380 Auto for self defense

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sorry Massad, but I have a tough time swallowing that.

Shooting after shooting! In these shootings after shootings, the victim shot a violent aggressor with a 380 and it "did little" to stop him immediately. Without evidence to support that claim, it's just another piece of "internet wisdom."

And what, exactly, do you mean by "run across"? Heard about? Investigated? Saw on the news?

I have no doubt that a volley of Golden Sabers will stop the aggressor adequately.
 
I am with Flopsy on this issue. The 380 acp round at the legal distance to respond with deadly force is more than suitable.

Another thought that EVERYONE needs to think about is, are you really only going to fire once :what: when the need to respond to defend your life comes into play????????????????? Are you kidding me???????? No I am not talking about firing 10 rounds into someone, but I think 2-3 rounds has been proven to be accurate in real defense incounters. (Who ever heard of 1 stop shots anyway) (They are out there, but that's because the person has either passed or has fled the scene)

Lastly, Bufflo Bore has some great 380+P ammo out that is sure to be great. Although I probly would HATE to have to fire it from a Kel-Tec.
http://www.buffalobore.com/ammunition/default.htm#380

Remember Reagan almost died from a 22lr and Hitler did die from a 32acp to the head.

After all of this, I hope and most likely you'll never as a citizen never have to defend your life on the streets, but stay perpared is your best defense. Meaning at least show up with a gun to a gun fight. lol
 
That has been my feelings as of late, Ghostrider. My Colt Pony clone holds six .380 rounds and that should be plenty to defend my life should a sudden need arise. It won't be a combat situation where I would need a 16 round magazine, and two more backup magazines. And at close range, I'm sure my Golden Sabers will do the job, . . . . . in the unlikely event that I will even ever have to use it. It will be there in a "last resort" situation.
 
Posted by Ghostrider 23:
I am with Flopsy on this issue. The 380 acp round at the legal distance to respond with deadly force is more than suitable.

Then how come not a single law enforcement agency (LEA) in the country uses it as their primary duty cartridge? The 9mm is considerably more potent than the .380, yet in the last couple decades a substantial number of LEA's have even abandoned the 9 in favor of the still more powerful .40 S&W.

The .380 has been completely rejected by American law enforcement. European LEA's replaced the .380 with 9mm's decades ago.

Another thought that EVERYONE needs to think about is, are you really only going to fire once when the need to respond to defend your life comes into play????????????????? Are you kidding me???????? No I am not talking about firing 10 rounds into someone, but I think 2-3 rounds has been proven to be accurate in real defense incounters. (Who ever heard of 1 stop shots anyway) (They are out there, but that's because the person has either passed or has fled the scene)

The average self-defense encounter occurs at about a distance of 21 feet or less. Many top police and civilian firearms instructors around the country have proven in actual demonstrations, that most people carrying guns can't even draw their weapon in time to stop a determined aggressor who makes a charge from that distance or less.

So if your life is ever on the line in a self-defense situation, you might be lucky to get off even one shot. There are plenty of documented cases over the years where homeowners were shot with their own guns, because they weren't able to get off a single round before being rushed and overpowered by their attacker(s).

Lastly, Bufflo Bore has some great 380+P ammo out that is sure to be great. Although I probly would HATE to have to fire it from a Kel-Tec.

Please show us some law enforcement documented cases where the Buffalo Bore ammo has made successful immediate stops on attackers. Just because it has a "cool" sounding name doesn't mean it's "sure to be great". Before you bet your life on it, you better have some real world evidence to back up your choice.

Remember Reagan almost died from a 22lr and Hitler did die from a 32acp to the head.

Hitler placed the gun to his head and pulled the trigger. At that close of range, a good pellet gun could've killed him. That does nothing to "prove" that the .32 is an adequate man stopper at a typical self-defense range of 21 feet.

Neither Reagan nor the Secret Service were aware he was even hit until he was safely in his car. With Secret Service agents around him, he was able to make it to his car under his own power after being shot. So the .22LR failed to stop him.

Handgun rounds are judged by their ability to incapacitate a person immediately. None are perfect, but some are definitely better than others. A .45 ACP or 9mm are MUCH better man stoppers than a .380 or .22.

After all of this, I hope and most likely you'll never as a citizen never have to defend your life on the streets, but stay perpared is your best defense. Meaning at least show up with a gun to a gun fight. lol

If you show up to a gunfight with determined aggressors with a .380, you will be POORLY prepared.
 
I agree that 380 is not a round for a gun fight, but I am comfortable with it for self defence. It is true that european LE agencies replaced 380s with the higher caliber guns, but the main purpose of LE agencies is not a self defence either - they do participate in the gun fights and face more powerful guns with hight capacity magazines.

Some people preffer to carry the largers caliber they can with the largest magazine capacity and spares. That mentality is suatable if you want plan to face an army every time your leave your house, but my philosophy is different. I carry different guns for different occasions: in the woods 380 would not do it, but for the casual daily carry in the city, 380 fits the purpose.
 
Defensory

Defensory

LEA: 1 have the ability to carry open, civilian have to choose to legally conceal and format to weight and size.
2 Are in the line of danger everyday, which I would think permits them to carry a better caliber. (Why not 45acp then back to your arguement)
3 You need to go back and read your states CCW response and responsibility to use deadly force. Which is 10 feet or less.
4 It's 12 feet not 21 feet that an average person is not able to draw from a holster and fire a shot.
5 No one plans or I at least hopes not to get into a gun fight, but how many times do we all run out the door without some form of protection??
6 BB 380 +P round is new and I nor anyone else has any data on this round.
7 Would you volunteer to allow someone to shoot you center mass with a 380. Please feel free to let us know so we can see just how ineffective the 380 round really is. (you can run at 21 feet if you'd like)

Need a plane ticket??????
 
I don't carry a .380 because I don't want to get into reloading another cartridge. But other than that, a .380 ought to be adequate for 99% of defensive uses (remembering that in 90%+ of defensive uses of a handgun, no shots are fired.)

On the other hand, since I already have 3 M1911s, that's what I carry.
 
While doing yard work yesterday, I had a homeless guy walk off the street and into the neighbors open garage.

He was carrying an aluminum baseball bat.

I was carrying a Kel-Tec P3AT and a cell phone.

I felt way much better armed then him when I yelled at him to get the hell out of there!

rcmodel
 
LEA: 1 have the ability to carry open, civilian have to choose to legally conceal and format to weight and size.

The 9mm is a significantly more powerful round than the .380, and there's virtually no difference in size and weight amongst the "pocket" models intended for concealed carry. Because of their blowback design, the .380's recoil is no lighter. Plus the fact that .380 ammo is noticeably more expensive than 9mm.

All of which means there's no intelligent reason to carry the .380 for self-defense.

Some U.S. and European LEO's , as well as LEO and civilian handgun instructors, refer to the .380 disparagingly as the "poodle shooter" or "pea shooter".

I'll take their word, as well as that of internationally renown defensive handgun experts like Massad Ayoob, over that of internet "experts" who make the false claim the .380 is a "reliable" manstopper.

2 Are in the line of danger everyday, which I would think permits them to carry a better caliber. (Why not 45acp then back to your arguement)

But they're not involved in shootouts every day. The average LEO will go his entire career without being involved in a shooting situation. Just like LEO's, I carry a sufficient round for what MIGHT happen.

It's common sense to be prepared with a round that will get the job done, which means nothing smaller than a 9mm in semi-autos, and a .38 Special in revolvers. The 9 and .38 are considered the BARE MINIMUM in self-defense use, by the vast majority of LEO and civilian handgun instructors.

3 You need to go back and read your states CCW response and responsibility to use deadly force. Which is 10 feet or less.

You need to worry about the law in your state, and let me worry about the law in mine.

In my state, you can use deadly force at up to 21 feet. Even more if somebody happens to be aiming a gun or other deadly projectile firing weapon at you. There's also no duty to retreat while in your home in my state.

4 It's 12 feet not 21 feet that an average person is not able to draw from a holster and fire a shot.

As usual, you're dead wrong. I saw a training video on Youtube just the other day, showing individuals being overpowered before they could draw, at TWENTY ONE FEET.

5 No one plans or I at least hopes not to get into a gun fight, but how many times do we all run out the door without some form of protection??

If you run out the door without protection, that's your own lack of thought and discipline.

Better safe than sorry. I don't plan on having a major medical emergency any time soon either, but I still pay for an excellent health insurance plan. If you carry only a .380 for self-defense, you are definitely UNDER insured.

6 BB 380 +P round is new and I nor anyone else has any data on this round.

Common sense should tell you to never bet your life on something that hasn't proven itself in real life situations.

7 Would you volunteer to allow someone to shoot you center mass with a 380. Please feel free to let us know so we can see just how ineffective the 380 round really is.

Your statement is utterly irrelevant.

Because I possess common sense, I'm not going to stand there and let somebody shoot me with even a BB pistol or a slingshot.

So your childish dare does absolutely nothing to prove that the .380 is a reliable manstopper, which it most certainly isn't.
 
Defensory

Defensory Quote:

Because I possess common sense, I'm not going to stand there and let somebody shoot me with even a BB pistol or a slingshot.

As you stated no one wants to get shot. 380, BB gun, etc...

I think you proved my case for me, thank you.

Thus the 380 is a good defense round.

To each is there own. Carry what makes you feel comfortable and can shoot well.

Defensory please find a life and stop trying to pee in other peoples cheerios, but thank you for your input.
 
The 9mm is a significantly more powerful round than the .380, and there's virtually no difference in size and weight amongst the "pocket" models intended for concealed carry.
are you kidding?
Here is a Kahr PM9 on the right and the new Kahr P380 on the left and your saying there's no difference in size!


IMG_1257.gif
 
are you kidding?
My thoughts exactly.
I can carry a P3AT comfortably in my shirt pocket all day.
(Locked breach, under 11 ounces loaded)

How many pocket 9's can you even get in your shirt pocket?

Ah!
I thought so!

rcmodel
 
The only 9mm handgun that comes close to some of the pocket 380s out there is Rohrbaugh R9.

The biggest advantage of shooting blowback fixed barrel pistols is the accuracy. Commander Bond would attest to that.

Of course, there are some unexpected situations where you might get into a gun fight and would need to fire dozens of rounds, but unless your are a thug or have people after you, the chances for most people are as slim as getting stuck by the lightning. I know it is good to be prepared for anything, but I don't wear a rubber suit, body armor, gas mask etc. Plus, there is always a bigger gun out there - you will be undergunned with your 45 pistol while facing someone with a rifle or a shotgun, especially at a long range.

My main carry piece is a single stack Kahr and my always gun is Seecamp 32 and sometimes NAA Guardian 380 (I only carry one gun at a time without reloads). My house gun is XD45, which is also my camping gun. My future bear gun when I am hiking will soon be Ruger 454, but a 12 ga shotgun in the meantime.
 
Exactly! A 380 is a shoot and scoot gun.

Getting hit with a 380 round will at the very least will distract a BG and give you some time to scoot!

Pocket guns were never meant for extended shootouts.
 
Posted by kokapelli:
are you kidding?
Here is a Kahr PM9 on the right and the new Kahr P380 on the left and your saying there's no difference in size!

I clearly stated that there was VIRTUALLY no difference in size.

Dictionary definition of "virtually":

"Almost but not quite; nearly"

There's only 4.4 ounces difference in weight between the Kel-Tec PF-9 and Kel-Tec P-3AT, and less than 2/3 of one inch difference in length.

If a 9mm that weighs less than 13 ounces and is less than 6 inches in length is a little too much for you to handle, I suggest you hire a 12-year old girl as a bodyguard. :neener:
 
never thought about carrying in a shirt pocket, pants pocket serves my 380 well as does my pm9, have no problems with either in pants pocket.. a 9mm is going to be bigger than most 380's. no matter how small a 9mm is, it won't come up to the 380 kt or lcp but sure doesn't mean not pocketable either.
 
Defensory says:
Because of their blowback design, the .380's recoil is no lighter.

umm...sorry defensory, but the pocket pistols are NOT blowback. Bersas, Sig p232, and walthers are indeed blowback, but we're not talking about those. Pocket pistols are guns like the Kahr p380, Ruger LCP, and Keltec P3AT. None of those are blowback.
 
Defensory

Why are you such a hateful little person????

It seems you are obsessed with proving yourself right and others wrong, be it a ones option that doesn't do what you want them to or other posters who simply disagree with your view point. I've found in dealing with people you get back exactly what you are looking for. It's always been courteous and usually the people go above and beyond what might be established to explain their own thoughts. From reading the hostility in your posts, I imagine that you either get your way or you really let them know it.

But Please once again,

find a life and stop trying to pee in other peoples cheerios
 
I clearly stated that there was VIRTUALLY no difference in size.

Dictionary definition of "virtually":

"Almost but not quite; nearly"

There's only 4.4 ounces difference in weight between the Kel-Tec PF-9 and Kel-Tec P-3AT, and less than 2/3 of one inch difference in length.

If a 9mm that weighs less than 13 ounces and is less than 6 inches in length is a little too much for you to handle, I suggest you hire a 12-year old girl as a bodyguard.
That's just wrong! There is a significant difference in size!
In addition to owning a PM9, I also own a PF9 and a few P-3
ATs, both of which I shot today.

I am able to carry the PF9 in few pairs of pants, but just a few.
I can carry the P3ATs in every pair of pants I own.

I have my PF9 and my P-3AT sitting here right now waiting to be cleaned and as you can see, they are not "Almost but not quite; nearly" the same size"! The PF9, as small as it is, is significantly bigger than the P-3AT:neener::neener:


pf9-p3at.JPG
 
Quote:

"so defensory are you avaliable"

Perhaps he left for his anger-management class?

JK. Sorry, I am usually not the type to remark in this manner, but this thread is entertaining - it was too difficult to pass. :)
 
I would prefer a Rohrbaugh but can't afford one. Having said that, a .380 is one of the most commonly used SD calibers in the world including here in the USA. All experts agree that the manufacture of .380 is due mainly to the physical characteristics of the weapon platform. I think it mainly has to do with how robust a blow-back system isn't. Even the Rohrbaughs spring needs to be changed every two hundred rounds (read that somewhere). A .380 (or 9x18) at 21 yards is a fine choice when something bigger is unavailable. I have been yearning for the new LCP myself but am waiting a bit longer to see if they really got it right. I figure in another year or two demand will not be so high.
 
WoW

Looks like Defensory took his football and went home!:neener: I deal with people like him all the time at work,(Goverment) Its his way or the highway.:rolleyes:
 
george29. I hear pros and cons on the R9, not price as much as just very very ammo sensitive. It's a small bugger for sure. My pm9 is bigger no doubt but it can ride in my front pocket with ease and mine at least willshoot everything I put in it, and I have 12,800 rounds down range through it. If I can't shoot um, I don't want um. not sure the R9 would take that type of shootings. I bet it would be a fun gun to shoot once you got it running right though..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top