Kano383
Member
I have recently tested Lehigh Xtreme Penetrator in .380, vs. ball ammo. Just on watermelons, but the results were eye-opening. Sorry, I can’t post the video directly, I get a “File too large” error.
I don’t care if watermelon is not exactly tissue-simulation material... Ball ammo punched a lil’ hole in the front, and popped a 1.5”-2” piece of crust off the back. Lehigh ammo blew the thing to pieces.
I am a firm believer in “solid” bullets with large meplats and similar shapes in rifles, having tested them on live large animals: Woodleigh Hydro, for example, create wound channels that are 2-3 times the caliber’s diameter, while going through bone and tough things like a solid does.
Considering the relatively low velocities of handgun ammo, the results I saw in my little backyard test were plenty enough to convince me that when I have to carry a .380, I better make sure that I have Lehigh, Underwood or similar design ammo in the mag.
All the tests I ever saw conducted with .380 HP reached conclusions to the tune of “The vast majority of HP do not expand reliably from a .380 if you vary the test medium and barriers”.
No such concerns with bullets that do not expand, but rely on their shape to have an effect on soft tissues - and go through hard stuff like FMJ would do, or better.
I don’t care if watermelon is not exactly tissue-simulation material... Ball ammo punched a lil’ hole in the front, and popped a 1.5”-2” piece of crust off the back. Lehigh ammo blew the thing to pieces.
I am a firm believer in “solid” bullets with large meplats and similar shapes in rifles, having tested them on live large animals: Woodleigh Hydro, for example, create wound channels that are 2-3 times the caliber’s diameter, while going through bone and tough things like a solid does.
Considering the relatively low velocities of handgun ammo, the results I saw in my little backyard test were plenty enough to convince me that when I have to carry a .380, I better make sure that I have Lehigh, Underwood or similar design ammo in the mag.
All the tests I ever saw conducted with .380 HP reached conclusions to the tune of “The vast majority of HP do not expand reliably from a .380 if you vary the test medium and barriers”.
No such concerns with bullets that do not expand, but rely on their shape to have an effect on soft tissues - and go through hard stuff like FMJ would do, or better.
Last edited: