BinhThuyUSN
Member
Looking for help in deciding best caliber for a CCW. Thinking about 380 but during a recent phone question, a gentleman suggested a 9mm. Thanks in advance for your ideas.
I'd think twice before carrying a slide-biting, underpowered, awful-triggered, stiff-slided, heavy-as-a-boat-anchor antique as a SD gun. Even James Bond has upgraded.Walther PPK...I liked the idea of having a "Bond" handgun.
Can you give us a little more information on your need? Is this going to be a pocket gun? What is your budget? Is this a daily carry? Do you need a high capacity CCW?Looking for help in deciding best caliber for a CCW. Thinking about 380 but during a recent phone question, a gentleman suggested a 9mm. Thanks in advance for your ideas.
Don't let them BS you. The .380 is pretty powerful cartridge. I own Russian Makarov in this caliber. It's utterly reliable with all kinds of ammo and magazine reloads hold 9 cartridges (one can't chamber 1 and put magazine with 9 rounds into the gun because magazine will not lock in place). I would stay away from tiny pocket guns in larger calibers as those are unshootable.Looking for help in deciding best caliber for a CCW. Thinking about 380 but during a recent phone question, a gentleman suggested a 9mm. Thanks in advance for your ideas.
If you look at "entry level" small 9mm guns compared to "entry level" 380 guns, there may a small premimum for 9mm. However, you will spend much more for ammo than the cost of the gun. 9mm range ammo is about $.20, 380 range ammo is about $.26 with fewer brands to choose from. You need to choose something that you will actually go to a range often, that usually entails having a gun that you like to shoot. I would recommend a Glock 26. It is heavy enough to be accurate and not beat your wrist/hand up. It is also small enough to carry without undue effort. It is has an extreamly good record of being reliable.Advantages of 9: I'm not sure that anyone disputes that 9mm is more effective than .380. 9mm is often cheaper to practice with. 9mm can be had in guns as small as those for .380. Many more choices in SD ammo for 9.
Disadvantages: the smallest 9mm guns will be much more expensive than small .380 guns, and have noticeably more recoil. If that degrades your ability to hit your target, that's a huge disadvantage.I'd think twice before carrying a slide-biting, underpowered, awful-triggered, stiff-slided, heavy-as-a-boat-anchor antique as a SD gun. Even James Bond has upgraded.
If you like that size, look at the Walther PPS in 9mm. But be prepared for sticker shock.
In the end, buy what you like if you will practice more because of that. But make sure you don't like the Walther PPS before buying the PPK.
My personal experience is that the larger .380s (Beretta 85/6/7, etc.), because they are of blow-back design, recoil more that mid-size 9mm pistols with locked breech. I've been told that the Walther/Umarex PK380 (locked breech .380) is very soft-kicking, but perhaps not very durable.The larger .380's are easier to shoot if arthritis is an issue
Hard to argue, except that it "feels" nothing like the PPK, which the OP likes. I think the PPS approximates the PPK better than the G26...but at substantially more cost.I would recommend a Glock 26