.45 acp single action cylinders gimmick or godsend

Acp cylinders


  • Total voters
    123
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's a godsend for non reloaders, neat for those who reload. Since it's mostly Ruger single actions that people are familiar with (I know Magnum Research BFR can have a spare cylinder made for it) the benefit for the non reloader is to have a powerful revolver capable of shooting hot .45 Colt ammo in a revolver for when they need or feel they need it, but also have a cheaper option for pracrice in the .45 ACP.

I reload, don't really have a need for a .45 ACP single action. If anything what I could use rn is a 9mm revolver cuz the ammo is so available and not terribly pricey compared to other centerfire calibers.
 
I prefer dedicated caliber guns. I have a plethoria of 45LC's and 45 ACP revolvers..........Would be a PIA to have to re-zero at each cylinder change.
 
I prefer dedicated caliber guns. I have a plethoria of 45LC's and 45 ACP revolvers..........Would be a PIA to have to re-zero at each cylinder change.

Don't seem to have that issue with my Pietta in .45 Colt/.45 ACP. .45 Colt with 250gr coated rnfp or .45 ACP with 230gr LRN loaded with preferred powder, shoots to damn close POA. It's all in the load.
 
My SAA .44 Special 240 shoots to the same POI with its .44-40-200 cylinder with 7.5" barrel.
During my brief flirtation with a 4.75" barrel, it didn't.
 
POI shifts are a reason why I lost interest in multiple chamberings in one gun and also chamber adapters for shotguns. Now, some work better than others, but in general I find the bigger the bore, the better it's going to work.

For my .45 Colt/ACP Redhawk, it does just fine with a 225gr LFN and roll crimp .45 ACP handload, but with 230gr ball and taper crimp... not so much.

About the only revolver out there now that I really want to try that has two cylinders is a .357 and 9mm. I'm sure there's a 9mm liad out there that will not be too far from the POA.
 
POI shifts are a reason why I lost interest in multiple chamberings in one gun and also chamber adapters for shotguns. Now, some work better than others, but in general I find the bigger the bore, the better it's going to work.

For my .45 Colt/ACP Redhawk, it does just fine with a 225gr LFN and roll crimp .45 ACP handload, but with 230gr ball and taper crimp... not so much.

About the only revolver out there now that I really want to try that has two cylinders is a .357 and 9mm. I'm sure there's a 9mm liad out there that will not be too far from the POA.

POI is errant on 9mm.
Putting a .355 bullet down a .358 barrel is not conducive to accuracy.
 
SAAMI specification for both 9mm P and .38 Special is .355" groove diameter, but with a huge +.004" tolerance.
US 9mm barrels seem to be held closer to spec, imports can run large, as do most .38s except for old Colts.
I think matchup for both rounds in a caliber convertible gun is a matter of luck.
 
None of the poll choices are an ideal response, in my case, so, I will type “Other,” here.

.45 ACP ammo is more generally available, than .45 Colt ammo, so, a .45 ACP cylinder does make plenty of sense. I have not found .45 Colt ammo to be “vaporware,” but it is quote expensive. I can get .45 Colt ammo with wide, flat noses, and even full wadcutters, so, do not “prefer” .45 ACP.

I have a Ruger Blackhawk, with 9mm and .357 cylinders, which allows me to train even less expensively that with .45 ACP ammo. I have a Ruger Bisley, with .45 Colt and .45 ACP cylinders, but it has been, uh, requisitioned, by The Missus, so, the .357/9mm Blackhawk is my lower-cost training sixgun.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top