.45 Colt DA Revolvers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
...Ruger overbuilds the &$!%# out of the Redhawk.

The M25/625 are much more svelte guns.

That's pretty much it it, in a nutshell. The higher velocities available with the Rugers essentially extends your range by giving you better ballistics. Since my hunting distances are measured in feet, not yards, and the .45 Colt shoots clean through deer as it is, I am quite happy with my setup. Now, if only I could find a way to silence the cocking of that big hammer.:)

Don
 
If you ever intend to use it "hotter" than standard .45 Colt, get the .44 MAg and use reduced loads, or .44 Specials in it.

Or get a Ruger Redhawk;)
 
I think I want to stay away from the model 25's. They seem a bit old and frail for modern .45 colt, plus, I couldn't make myself shoot such a beautiful and timeless piece.

In my opinion, if you want to hot rod a 45 Colt, get a 44 Magnum or a 454 Causall.

My Model 25-5 is a joy to shoot and will handle standard 45 Colt loads forever. I would not feel under gunned with it.

The 45 Colt served the the military and men of the wild west quite well.

I once pressed my Model 25 into service for a IHMSA silhouette match when my 357 magnum revolver broke. It would take the 200 meter rams down on one bounce! Not bad, in my opinion, for a 130 year old or so cartridge.
 
I couldn't make myself shoot such a beautiful and timeless piece.
I shoot my 25-5 as well as my 25-2.

My 25-5 is 90%, a shooter for sure, but my 25-2 is 97%, and I shoot it anyway. I am very careful with it, but I certainly shoot it.
 
Last edited:
The Redhawk 45LC can handle 32,000 PSI loads. The S&W 25 can handle 20,000 PSI loads. The RH weighs about 8 ounces more.

My RH 45 has never had a problem extracting 45LC brass. I've never heard of any Redhawks having problems with extracting 45LC brass. Maybe this is a problem with the S&W 25? I dunno.

My RH 45LC 4 inch can shoot a Buffalo Bore 325 grain bullet at 1260 fps. A S&W 25 shoots a 250 grain bullet at 1000 fps.

The S&W 25 is real pretty, has a nicer trigger and is about 8 ounces lighter, but the Redhawk is in a completely different category when it comes to power. You decide which is better for you.

BTW, the problem with the Redhawk is that it really should be offered with a 454 cylinder instead of the 45LC. Then we wouldn't be having these discussions.
 
Last edited:
The Redhawk .45 Colt is stout. It's supposed to be even stronger than the BH or SBH. I've seen some claim it's good for up to 50,000 (psi or cup, can't remember).

Brass extraction is only a problem if you hold the barrel horizontal and slowly push the ejector. If you tip the barrel up and smartly eject the cases you shouldn't have any problems with that.
 
I've never heard of any Redhawks having problems with extracting 45LC brass. Maybe this is a problem with the S&W 25?

It's not a problem with the Model 25 either. If you have a problem with this happening, it's something particular to your gun.

Don
 
I own three, two M25-5s and a RH. The S&Ws carry better and are nicer handling and looking. The RH is heavier so has less felt recoil with the same load, not that recoil is really a problem in .45 Colt. It is also stronger. If I need/want a hot load, the Ruger is what I use. The Ruger is ccurrently doing bedside duty with some BB heavy/standard pressure 200gr GD HPs. Very nice combination.
 
Ain't it great that we can have different opinions about nice .45 Colt DA wheel guns without bad-mouthing anyone else's pick? It's precisely why I enjoy this forum, thanks to you Gents! M25s are smoother, prettier & lighter. RRHs are stouter, heavier & you don't worry about the odd scratch. The differences sound a lot like my wives (but I won't say which is which) :cool:.
 
Last edited:
My solution to this conundrum was to by a 5" bbl S&W 460 magnum. Problem solved. You can shoot 45 Schoffield (spelled right?), .45 colt, .454 Casull, and .460 mags. You can vary the power from around 250 ft. lbs. to 2900 if you buy Buffalo Bore. And if you miss what you are shooting at, the fire ball that shoots out of the end will light what you are shooting at on fire!

Could there be a better revolver? It kills and cooks food all at the same time! ;)

I still want a .44 though, cuz.............. well I have no reason.
 
I'm hard pressed to think of a centerfire revolver that would be less stressed than a Redhawk in 45 Colt. Let us know if you ever wear it out.
 
If you are shopping for a 1-ton truck of handguns, go with the Redhawk. It is, as many others have said, dependable, hell for stout and darn-near indestructible. If you want a fine handling sports car, get a Smith and Wesson. They aren't as tough, but they are nice. I have both in my safe and I won't be getting rid of either of them.
 
Ruger extended the extractor star on the .45 Colt 4" Redhawk specifically to prevent the extraction problem that has been mentioned. If you compare a .44 Redhawk extractor star to a .45 Colt extractor star, you'll see what I mean.
 

Attachments

  • cylrh_45.jpg
    cylrh_45.jpg
    50.2 KB · Views: 19
  • 072211TWENTYTWORUGERREVOLVERS 009.jpg
    072211TWENTYTWORUGERREVOLVERS 009.jpg
    70.9 KB · Views: 22
My first DA-capable revolver was a 7.5" .454 SRH - and it was a delightful .45 Colt launcher, if a tad large. It was more accurate with .454 Casulls, too. My second DA revolver was my first-ever S&W - a 625-7 Mountain Gun in .45 Colt. That started a trend - and I soon sold or traded away my Rugers, .45 RH & .454 SRH alike. I found something even better than a 625 MG in .45 Colt - two of them!

IMG_3430.jpg

I added an older model - LN - a 625-6 MG. Yes, folks overload their RH's - but I can get nearly 900 fps from both a 250gr Gold Dot and a 255gr LSWC and be within the SAAMI spec for .45 Colt. If I need more than that, I have to quit hunting in the zoo!

Of course, I added another .45 Colt capable S&W revolver last June - for just a few bucks more than that MG cost my wife (It was a shocker of a gift!) 8/02. It also chambers .45 ACP, .45 Schofield, and 2.5" .410's!

001-1.jpg

Yeah, it's the Governor. Mine sports the X-frame S&W .500 Magnum Hogue monogrips from S&W Accessories for recoil control (It's Al/Sc frame & SS cylinder add up to near 30 oz - pretty light.). Fun revolver!

Stainz
 
I have a Taurus 450 (discontinued) Ultra Lite that is my daily carry in cooler weather (pocket carry). If you can find one, you'll like it.

Also, for a trail gun ... don't overlook the Judge (I've got one of those too). For me, that is my nightstand / car traveling gun. I think it would make a great trail gun as well.
 
I recently purchased a Redhawk in 45 Colt. I will agree that Ruger builds a tank of a revolver in the Redhawk, as I have one in both 41 and 44 magnums. They have both been to the upper end of the spectrum with numerous loads through the 25 or so years I have had them, and they both still shoot just as well as they did when new.

As for the latest addition, so far I have only had a few test loads through it, but I really do not feel that it needs to be pushed much if any above 1100fps with any load. To start off with, it will already be punching an almost 1/2" hole in anything it hits, and no matter what this isn't going to get any smaller. I have already shot groups of around 3" or so at 100yds, using some home cast 300 grainers at only about 1000fps if that. I didn't have the chrono so I am simply guessing but the load data suggested around the 850-900 fps area for a 4" barrel and mine is 7.5". I will not feel a bit under gunned putting this one to task on a deer or feral hog once I get the load tweaked to where I like it. Using anything from a 230 - 300gr cast boolit, or even one of the JHP's like the Gold Dot or XTP, I feel this will be a very formidable hunting tool.

I agree that there are quite a few different revolvers chambered in this caliber, and some can be loaded up to pretty impressive loads, but as has been mentioned if you want to run a full throttle 45 caliber to magnum velocities, why not simply go with the 454 or a 460.

I hunt with almost all of my revolvers, and do quite a bit of walking to and from my stands, as well as stalking the thicker woods for hogs. It might simply be me, but I have never felt that the 7.5" RH's were an issue to carry during the course of a day's hunting. Now my 8 3/8" Raging Bull in 454, that's another story.
 
Colt DA Revolver questions

I recently purchased a Colt DA 45 ACP from a local pawn shop. the serial number is 253XXX so from what I can find makes this pistol made in about 1918.Here is the problem I cant seem to find any good pics or details to verify all markings on gun. Serial all matches, H on cyl and frame. Tried gun show and got 20 different stories on gun from people trying to buy it. Anyone have any good references I can buy or check...This gun shoots great , my main problem is trying to verify finish , some say reblued others not ???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top