In a sort of follow-up to a previous thread of mine; I'm curious to a few facts about some of the big boys on the Revolver block.
Since the limit of what I can actually handle in Live-Fire stands at around a .44 Magnum; anything else above that tends to want to break my wrists, I haven't had the suicidal want to test this myself yet, but I'm curious nonetheless.
I've read many reports on both carts; the .454 has more then half a Century of reliable use backing it's name and claim to the title of a Magnum round; and that's still 50 years plus more availability.
But if your after a balls-to-the-Wall magnum, I can't say I've seen anything reasonably more powerful then the .500 Magnum; barring the insaneo guns that are chambered to things well above .50 caliber like the .600 Nitro revolver flitting around the internet, but all that power in the .500 Magnum cart comes with a few questions.
First off, I don't know if anyone here's had a chance to paly around with it it yet, but what's the overall performence in comparison to eachother? I'm working on a bit of fiction, as anyone visiting 'My Unusual Handgun Question' thread will know, and frankly I can't wrap my brain around which round would be more practical.
Frankly I'm leaning towards the .454 as with again, 50 or so years of history over the .500 Magnum, it's bound to be easier to get ahold of in both manufactured boxes and handloader Brass and Bullets, not to mention there are many frames dedicated to it's use, the original Taurus Raging Bull springs readily to mind.
For both a Fun Shooting and Big-Bore Hunting/Home Defense sidearm; where does the Shooting Community stand on these two badasses?
Since the limit of what I can actually handle in Live-Fire stands at around a .44 Magnum; anything else above that tends to want to break my wrists, I haven't had the suicidal want to test this myself yet, but I'm curious nonetheless.
I've read many reports on both carts; the .454 has more then half a Century of reliable use backing it's name and claim to the title of a Magnum round; and that's still 50 years plus more availability.
But if your after a balls-to-the-Wall magnum, I can't say I've seen anything reasonably more powerful then the .500 Magnum; barring the insaneo guns that are chambered to things well above .50 caliber like the .600 Nitro revolver flitting around the internet, but all that power in the .500 Magnum cart comes with a few questions.
First off, I don't know if anyone here's had a chance to paly around with it it yet, but what's the overall performence in comparison to eachother? I'm working on a bit of fiction, as anyone visiting 'My Unusual Handgun Question' thread will know, and frankly I can't wrap my brain around which round would be more practical.
Frankly I'm leaning towards the .454 as with again, 50 or so years of history over the .500 Magnum, it's bound to be easier to get ahold of in both manufactured boxes and handloader Brass and Bullets, not to mention there are many frames dedicated to it's use, the original Taurus Raging Bull springs readily to mind.
For both a Fun Shooting and Big-Bore Hunting/Home Defense sidearm; where does the Shooting Community stand on these two badasses?