There is absolutely nothing wrong with this except the risk of you or someone else chambering one of your Rowlands in another gun.
1. Rowland Conversion:
Fully supported Rowland barrel
Stronger spring
Muzzle break
2. What I assume you are proposing:
Fully supported .45 barrel
Stronger spring
Muzzle break.
If the gun is strong enough for #1 it is strong enough for #2. I don't think that most people who have responded on this thread are aware that most Rowland pistols are conversions and the longer case has nothing to do with protecting the converted gun and everything to do with protecting unconverted guns (as well as protecting J.R. Rowland's, Starline's, and Clark Customs' butts from liability).
I would use a gun that is known to be reliable for 10mm (37.5kpsi SAAMI Max average pressure) for the Rowland (40kpsi SAMMI Max average pressure). Although the pressures are similar, you are going to have as much as 36% more bolt thrust with the Rowland hence the need for a comp to slow the gun down. In the case of a Glock, I would use the "wide" slide full sized 20/21. Of course none of this has anything to do with the depth of your chamber as .45 ACP and .45 Rowland are loaded to the same OAL.
A few weeks ago, I had read about some tests of three aftermarket "fully supported barrels" and they recommended Lone Wolf and one other and did not recommend the third. Sorry I don't have the link. I took note because I use Lone Wolf.
Mike