686 revolver - Reliable? Value?

Status
Not open for further replies.

jdedonato

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
27
Hello All,

I recently picked up a 686 (no dash) 6 inch barrel revolver, bult in 1984, to pump out tons of 357 mags. I am getting the recall taken care of for the hammer firing pin.

When I get it back from S&W, should I expect to have a reliable piece? I will use it only at the range, once a month.

Any idea what this is worth in nearly mint condition?
 
It will certainly be reliable. I'm not sure if your model has the floating hand or not. I have a 686-1 which does, and I plan to have my S&W authorized Gunsmith fit a standard hand.
Value is probably between 350-425 depending on your location and whether you have the box etc.
 
686

I paid close to $700 for my 686 2 yrs ago. So far, I've shot over a thousand rounds through it. Some of these rounds were really hot loads. So far, so good.
 
I haven't heard about the recall. What's the story on it?

------------
Must be this one. Does it require replacing the hammer or any of my other parts?

SMITH & WESSON
MODEL 581, 586, 681, 686, or 581-1,
586-1, 681-1, 686-1 & 686CS-1, REVOLVERS

RECALL: Reports have been received from the field where the combination of a SMITH & WESSON L-FRAME 357 MAGNUM REVOLVER and some .357 Magnum ammunition has resulted in unacceptable cylinder binding. L-frame revolvers bearing model numbers:

581, 586, 681, 686, or 581-1, 586-1,
681-1, 686-1, 686CS-1

Cylinder binding can cause a failure to fire. Mishandling a revolver while freeing the cylinder can result in accidental discharge.

Cylinder binding can result from a number of causes, including characteristics of an individual revolver or the use of ammunition, which does not conform to industry pressure specifications or is particularly fast burning. Recent developments in ammunition manufacture emphasize the production of .357 Magnum ammunition with increased velocity and greater primer sensitivity.

Although there have been very few reported incidents of cylinder binding, in view of our concern for our customer's safety and the reliability of Smith & Wesson products in all circumstances, we issue the following warning:

In a situation where a failure to fire can be critical - such as law enforcement or personal protection - do not use .357 Magnum ammunition with an L-frame revolver bearing model numbers 581, 586, 681, 686 or 581-1, 586-1, 681-1, 686-1, 686CS-1 without an "M" over the model number until you have had the revolver modified.

Those who need to use their L-frame revolver under these conditions prior to modification can safely fire .38 Special caliber ammunition.

Smith & Wesson has developed a modification to improve existing L-frame revolvers. This improvement enables them to fire all .357 Magnum ammunition, without cylinder binding. Shipments of L-frame revolvers from our factory after August 21, 1987 already include this improvement.

You can check if your revolver includes this improvement by looking at the left side of the frame when the cylinder is fully open. If your revolver has been stamped either with a "2" or higher number after the basic three-digit model number or with an "M" above the model number, your revolver includes this improvement and does not need modification. If your revolver bears the model number 581, 586, 681, 686, or 581-1, 586-1, 681-1, 686-1, 686CS-1 without an "M" over the model number, it does not include this improvement and your should have your revolver modified.

Smith & Wesson will modify your L-frame revolver free of charge to eliminate the possibility of cylinder binding with .357 Magnum ammunition. Law enforcement agencies wishing to arrange for modification of L-frame revolvers should call 800-458-8469 between 9 A.M. and 6 P.M. Eastern time (MA residents call 413-734-8244). Other users should send their revolvers to a Smith & Wesson Warranty Service Center, specifying "L-frame improvement program" and enclosing their name and return address.

One of the modifications to improve the L-frame revolver is the installation of a new hammer nose. This obsoletes all old L-frame hammer noses (part numbers 4702 and 7513) and all old L-frame hammer assemblies (part numbers 3366, 3378, 3380, 3382, 3391, 4722, 4723, 4726 and 4728) in field parts inventories. Superseded parts should never be fitted into a modified revolver as this may result in malfunction. It is essential for safety that you return these obsolete L-frame hammer noses and obsolete L-frame hammer assemblies for a free exchange to:

Smith & Wesson
Service Department
2100 Roosevelt Avenue
Springfield, MA 01101

Do not return L-frame hammer-nose bushings from your spare parts inventory inasmuch as they are useable in J, N and K-frame revolvers, which are not included in this Product Warning.

We regret any inconvenience this may cause. Smith & Wesson's first concern is the safety of its products and the protection of its customers.
 
Reliable? The 686 is the definition of reliable. You can shoot thousands of full blast magnums per year and the gun will only ask for more. Or you can load it, put it on a shelf for 50 years, pick it up and pull the trigger and it will go bang. Guaranteed.

You own the .357 handgun by which all other .357s are judged. Shoot it and enjoy!
 
You can not go wrong with a 686. i just picked one up and love it.outstanding trigger pull, single, and phenominal double pull.
 
I love my S&W 686 6" as well. The trigger is very smooth. The gun shoots very accurate. It eats my HOT handloads all day. I have had this gun for a year now and I have not been unhappy with it yet. I am a huge S&W fan now and I want more of there revolvers!
 
In a moment of stupidity, I sold my 686 w/4" barrel...It was also one that needed the recall. S&W took care of it in about 2 weeks, came back with the stamped, "m" for modification...
Hell, when I fired that piece others looked in awe; probably for my lousy shooting....:D
 
Fantastic Gun

I simply love the 686. Absolutely reliable. Also, the most accurate of all my firearms (a testament to its smooth and "surprising" trigger).
 
Don't own a 686, but I do own it's better looking sister, the 586 in 4 inch. My favorite handgun, hands down. Although I wish I could find a 6 inch version. L-Frames are excellent. I think they're the best balancing of all S&W frames.
 
My 686 is my favorite gun. Of course, they are all my favorites!

For a gun of it's weight, it feels lighter to me because it balances so well. For this reason, I picked it over the Ruger GP100, which is an excellent gun in it's own right. Just not right for me.

I bought mine new, so it does have the lock :( , but I can deal with that since it has proven to be 100% reliable and shoots to POA with 158 grn ammo. Didn't even have to adjust the sights! The trigger is probably the smoothest of any of my Smiths by a tiny margin, and the pull is a hair shorter as this is a 7 shot model. The DA pull is just a tad heavier than my M14 or 17.

My 686 was the 2nd gun my sister ever shot. My K-22 was her first :cool: . She's hooked! She is saving her money for a 686, though I suggested she look at others too (K Frames, Rugers, Tauri) and pick what feels best to her.

Treat you 686 right, and it should last a lifetime +.

Here's a couple of picks of my beloved 686+:


686_12-4.jpg

686_12-2.jpg
 
Jad0110, good looking gun...No "racoon eyes" on that baby....:D
BTW, on the + 7rd models, do they make it with a 2" barrel?
My juices are flowing again for a 686 to my wife's chagrin.:cuss:

Jad0110, thanks for the additional pic of the snub-nose 686 7-shot below... Hell, besides getting old, I'm going broke.......
 
Last edited:
I love my 686. I scoped it for hunting. There are few things that bring me more joy than clover leafing at 75 yards with it loaded up with some serious deer killers.
 
Jad0110, good looking gun...No "racoon eyes" on that baby....
BTW, on the + 7rd models, do they make it with a 2" barrel?
My juices are flowing again for a 686 to my wife's chagrin.

Mad Magyar,

Thanks for the compliment, it looks pretty good since I used a little Flitz polish on it.

The shortest barrel available in both the 686 & 686+ is 2.5". The 7 shot model weighs .5 oz less than the 6. I don't think the cylinder is any wider, but I could be wrong.

Here's a picture of a 2.5" 686+ from Kim Ahrends grips website.

I suggest if you don't want to be tempted any further, hit the back button on your browser now :evil: :












ec%205.jpg
 
I have one with a 6 inch barrell. The gun is a pleasure to shoot and the trigger is fantastic. The only thing(s) I bought for this gun was speed loaders, ammo and more ammo. I can't even remember how many rounds I put through mine. I have never had a problem with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top