Jwbfx4
Member
I went with 115gr due to being cheaper and at the time brazos only had the coated 124’s with a lube groove. They are supposed to be getting the molds in for the 124’s with no lube groove, so I’ll probably try them on the next order.
What is your standard load for the 124gr Acme coated RN? With Titegroup?
By the way, how's that EAA Windacator I sold you been treating you? Still accurate? I finally got the 4" barrel version, but still haven't had the chance to shoot it...
On your suggestion I bought a box of 125gr rnfp coated ACME bullets in 38/357. I loaded them all up with 3.5grs of Titegroup, I haven't shot them yet, but I am looking forward to.
So the ACME 124gr 9mm RN bullets cycle ok? How accurate are they?
It seems that about 115 gr., taking in consideration of grams to grains conversion, what was common. I haven't found an actual writing of the original weight by Luger.Right now I plink with 115 gr because they are a little cheaper. Slightly off topic here but what was the original military load a 124 or 115? Im pretty sure nato rounds nowadays are 124's.
It seems that about 115 gr., taking in consideration of grams to grains conversion, what was common. I haven't found an actual writing of the original weight by Luger.
NATO, per Wikipedia, list standard bullet weight between 108 gr. to 128 gr.
I'm still vacillating between 147 and 124. I like both. Jakes' July 4th sale prompted me to add even more boxes of both!What weight do most folks shoot?