9mm in a revolver?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I had a Blackhawk with a 9mm cylinder before I was a handloader. It was fun and accurate and cheap ammo could always be found.

Now I'm thinking of sending my Freedom Arms model 97 in for a longer barrel and a 9mm cylinder. They could use our support right now.

I enjoy handloading, but don't always have the time, and it would get my revolver out to the range more often. (I'm an auto guy).
 
Some good points above.

Like I said before I like the idea of revolver reliability and lower maintenance.

Then there's the commonly available 9mm round that's a proven performer with the right bullet.
I dunno about you guys but the local gun stores up here have 2-3 types of .38 and .357 the cheapest of which is $15 or so for 50 FMJ's. Meanwhile they have eight or more varieties of 9mm Para starting at half that for the FMJ's and going up to whiz bang 147-gr hollow points.

I would like to get into revolvers more but the cost of .38 Special and .357 compared even to my .45's ammo is outrageous. So for me a 9mm revolver sounds good.

Also, wouldn't a moon clip basically be a built in speed loader?
 
As said by others, 9mm revolvers are available, just not popular enough to cause the manufacturers to flood the market with them.
 
the moon clips do act as a built in speed loader only better.IDPA even seperates them into 2 classes cause of the speed difference.also the short ejector rod on snubbies is long enough to compleatly eject 9mm.
 
I love my 9mm Ruger SP-101. Cheap ammo, moonclips for quick loading, positive ejection, power level approximating the .357 from a short barrel, very manageable recoil. I find it interesting that these revolvers are always discontinued due to poor sales but I can never find any on the used market. I'll buy every one I can find.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top