ThomasT
Member
First thought, why?
Second, I also once thought it might be a good idea and bought a Taurus 905. It was supposed to back up my G17. I wrong on both accounts.
Third, Taurus supposedly makes the 692 which is a multiple caliber revolver.
Fourth, don't take the advice of someone that just bought a way-too-expensive Bond Derringer (me).
I too suffer from arthritis but I see no advantage in a 9mm revolver when 38's are in abundance. Also, the little wafer thin star shaped moon clips bend out of shape easily rendering it useless. It's the Achilles heel of this revolver.
I give semi auto rounds in a revolver a big thumbs down. Just because it was done during the Philippines insurrection doesn't mean it's a good idea under normal circumstances.
I'm with you. Why? Other than cheap ammo and a perceived faster reload I don't understand wanting to shoot a 9mm in a gun designed for a rimmed cartridge. And if 38s recoil too much then try 38s loaded with 110gr bullets. It does make a difference. I reload for everything I shoot so ammo cost is the same across the board for me. I hope someone can give a good argument for shooting a 9mm in a revolver. I will gladly listen to your reasons why its a good idea.
""Just because it was done during the Philippines insurrection doesn't mean it's a good idea under normal circumstances."
Actually I think it was more WW1 than the Philippine war due to a shortage of the new 1911 auto and the Army wanting to use the 45acp round.