CZ 82 M&Ps rule. Easily concealed, easily carried. Plus it has a great DA/SA trigger with premium CZ frame ergonomics designed to fit a human hand, not an orangutang’s.45?GAP
Only because I despise crude Combloc guns. Wouldn’t take one free.
A Bulgarian Makarov would probably sell for less than the Glock, Russian maybe even, and an East German for a few bucks more. At the last gun show I went to, a year ago, I saw an IJ-70 for $400. That's the civilian/commercial, Russian made version with adjustable sights. They're generally of less interest to collectors than the military version.The one that would bring the most money when I sell it unfired. And I'd have to do some research on that. Not sure which would be worth the most money but I'm thinking the Mak would be easier to sell.
To each their own I guess. To me, the CZ 82 is a crude straight blowback with a lousy trigger. All the early CZ’s were crudely built, including the early CZ 75. Much like the rest of the ComBloc pistols.CZ 82 M&Ps rule. Easily concealed, easily carried. Plus it has a great DA/SA trigger with premium CZ ergomics designed to fit a human hand, not an orangutang’s.
Interestingly, the 9mmMak cartridge itself is a ‘tweener’ 9x18, with an oddball 0.365” bullet. That puts it right between the .380 (9x17) and the 9mm parabellum (9x19).
I was just about to google making GAP brass from ACP just out of curiosity; I'll never buy a gun chambered in it.The 45 GAP. I have a ton of 45ACP brass that can be modified to GAP specs. I can have loaded ammo for cheap with the components I already have. The Glock 37 has an identical grip to the G22 so i know exactly how it fits and shoots.
All the 9mm Mak guns I’ve shot were of straight blowback design, so I’m not persuaded that’s a valid criticism. The fixed barrel design is also very accurate.To each their own I guess. To me, the CZ 82 is a crude straight blowback with a lousy trigger. All the early CZ’s were crudely built, including the early CZ 75. Much like the rest of the ComBloc pistols.
I’ve found the power level of 9mm Mak ammo varies, depending on who’s loading it. Even with the same 95grn bullet-weight, the Euro-made stuff generally runs hotter.Oh and 9x18 power level is much closer to 380 than it is to 9x19.
BB makes a lot of boutique ammo in many calibers.All the 9mm Mak guns I’ve shot were of straight blowback design, so I’m not persuaded that’s a valid criticism. The fixed barrel design is also very accurate.
I’ve found the power level of 9mm Mak ammo varies, depending on who’s loading it. Even with the same 95grn bullet-weight, the Euro-made stuff generally runs hotter.
Then there’s the ’boutique’ ammo from Buffalo Bore in 9Mak which launches a heavier hard cast FP slug @ 1Kfps.
^^^same here. Ain't into either caliber or the collecting of such. Whatever the "won" gun brought, would go towards another 1911 in .45 ACP.The one that would bring the most money when I sell it unfired. And I'd have to do some research on that. Not sure which would be worth the most money but I'm thinking the Mak would be easier to sell.
Mak.I'm bored. Let's say you won a raffle and have the choice between a Makarov and a .45 GAP Glock, which one you choosing and why?