230RN
2A was "political" when it was first adopted.
Scanning over the discussions about this case, I found comfort in this snippet of commentary from District Court Judge John L. Sinatra Jr.:
"Sinatra tartly wrote that the 'plaintiff’s constitutional rights are being violated' and that 'legislative enactments may not eviscerate the Bill of Rights. Every day they do is one too many.' "
Sounds like he is aware and averse to the obvious antis' technique of repeatedly re-doing legislation in minor ways just to thwart prior judicial decisions.
I tell you true, if Judge Sinatra were running for King, I'd seriously consider voting for him.
< big grin >
After all, there's a lot to be said for Benificent Monarchies, except for the fact that they keep modifying their policies to be not-so-benificent over time.
Although....come to think of it... so does every other form of government.
Terry, 230RN
"Sinatra tartly wrote that the 'plaintiff’s constitutional rights are being violated' and that 'legislative enactments may not eviscerate the Bill of Rights. Every day they do is one too many.' "
Sounds like he is aware and averse to the obvious antis' technique of repeatedly re-doing legislation in minor ways just to thwart prior judicial decisions.
I tell you true, if Judge Sinatra were running for King, I'd seriously consider voting for him.
< big grin >
After all, there's a lot to be said for Benificent Monarchies, except for the fact that they keep modifying their policies to be not-so-benificent over time.
Although....come to think of it... so does every other form of government.
Terry, 230RN
