Hangingrock
Member
There are those of us whom were on the receiving end of SKS fire in 1965-66. Enough said end of subject!
Larger game in Africa?? The 7.62x39 is in the same ballpark as the 30-30, but with a thicker jacket. The ammo in the US is not downloaded. There’s plenty of surplus ammo on the US market. I still have Russian, Chinese, Yugo and some others. Most of the surplus is useless for hunting, being FMJ and having a thick jacket.Well I'll be... That is a pretty SKS. Never thought I would say that. Interesting the Russians say it's for medium and large game, proven in Africa even. Aha! just knew the 762x39 ammo in the US was downloaded I do wonder if the Molot rifle has more refined sights since it appears to be sporterized somewhat by the factory?
Larger game in Africa?? The 7.62x39 is in the same ballpark as the 30-30, but with a thicker jacket. The ammo in the US is not downloaded. There’s plenty of surplus ammo on the US market. I still have Russian, Chinese, Yugo and some others. Most of the surplus is useless for hunting, being FMJ and having a thick jacket.
View attachment 1012182
Tested is not the term I would use for the only type of gun you have. The 7.62x39 is a mid range cartridge. It is very capable of taking deer and hogs within its range limits. But you don’t find people hunting bear and other dangerous game with an SKS, if they can choose the rifle they want.My comment was in jest based on the description from the Molot website. Much like the old ads about super power rifles we used to see here.
The OP-SKS carbine is designed for commercial and amateur hunting for medium and large game.
For more than half a century it has been used in all types of traditional Russian hunts. Tested on predators in Africa, Southeast Asia, Central America, Middle East.
Have you ever taken a SKS trigger group apart? If so, you would understand the sear problem. I learned howto clean up a SKS trigger group before there was a YouTube.I owned a Norinco back when they were cheap, under $100 with ammo thrown in. It was swimming in cosmoline, but once I got all that crap off of it I found the real issues with it. First off it shot patterns like a shotgun at 50-100 yards. Second, the trigger was awful, gritty and heavy. But the reason I got rid of it was that the sear had such light engagement that rapping the stock on the floor like if you dropped it would have fired it. At that price it wasn't worth getting it fixed. I'm not even sure how you manage a heavy trigger and a light sear. I let the buyer know the issues, and he still bought it for more than twice what I paid, back when the price of a good AK was $300-400.
If I had known that prices would get this stupid, I'd have held onto it.
Have you ever taken a SKS trigger group apart? If so, you would understand the sear problem. I learned howto clean up a SKS trigger group before there was a YouTube.
In the early to late 90, it was the Heyday of the SKS. They were cheap and plentiful. There were all kinds of aftermarket parts for fixing them up. Now days there’s not as much. The SKS has found a home here in the US and is loved by many, but to some it will always be like a red headed stepchild with freckles.
Sadly, aside from taking it apart to clean the quarts of cosmoline out/off of the gun, I didn't try to figure out the problems. I bought it because it was inexpensive, and as my first centerfire semi auto, if I screwed it up somehow, no big loss. I did keep it to refinish the stock for practice, as I got an M1 Garand through the DCM program that needed the stock refinished. Nowadays I would have completely disassembled it, figured out the mechanical interactions, and looked on YT to see how to fix them. Don't know if that would have fixed the patterning, that was more of a barrel issue most likely.
“Tested on predators…” I wonder if they’re referring to Russian foreign policy in supplying their clients with SKS’s in all those regions?For more than half a century it has been used in all types of traditional Russian hunts. Tested on predators in Africa, Southeast Asia, Central America, Middle East.
SKS accuracy seems to be a love it or hate it question.
It’s either a tack-driver that holds its own with the typical AR and far surpasses the typical AK, or it’s a minute-of-barn accurate and really not much good for anything except making noise.
“Tested on predators…” I wonder if they’re referring to Russian foreign policy in supplying their clients with SKS’s in all those regions?
So is Molot in Russia:
https://molot.biz/goods/op-sks.html
The Norinco I bought new thirty years ago is super consistent 5 inch shooter with any of the 120-125 grain ammo. The 154 grain wolf and tula/herters will usually be 3 to 4 inches at 100. Just fine plinking and general truck gun uses. Pretty crappy in comparison with my Yugo which will print close to 1-1/2 moa with fusions and bit over 2 with most of the steel its been fed. I suspect with an optic and handloads it could be a 1 moa rifle.I've read for years, right here at THR, how an SKS is usually the choice for accuracy when compared to an AK. I've never put the two to a real accuracy test to find out for myself, though.
Not saying you're right or wrong, this article from 2012 states they are new manufacture, granted the SKS pictured is wearing a different stock:Molot SKS are milsurp refurb/sporterized, not new manufacture.
Not saying you're right or wrong, this article from 2012 states they are new manufacture, granted the SKS pictured is wearing a different stock:
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2012/10/23/molots-modern-sks/
Then there's also this, a smoothbore "shotgun" version:
https://www.all4shooters.com/en/hunting/shotguns/molot-vpo208-366tkm-semi-automatic/
There was a time when I wanted an SKS but I got over it
There was a time when I wanted an SKS but I got over it