A new appreciation for THR

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't get what you mean? Are you trying to say there's a connection between locked threads and cost of running THR? Or am I missing something? :D
I've only ever seen locked threads when they were off-topic.

Yeah.
Threads drift. They always seem to when two or three posters go on a personal vendetta against each other and that happens here about as frequently as other forums.

But there are posts that are quite interesting and informative that get quickly locked here because they "Don't fit the forum context."
I would like to see some of those threads run as long as they don't become nasty.
I can only guess they do get locked because bandwidth to support those threads is expensive.
 
I also enjoy THR more than any other forum.
I dislike the fact that threads are closed because "we have been over this a dozen times". So what? If that is true then why are 100 people posting on the thread? Maybe I want to add my opinion. So what if we have discussed 22 LR availability or 30-06 vs 308 1,000,000 times? Apparently there are people that want to discuss it further and, so long as it doesn't get too heated, just let it ride. If you don't want to see another post about a certain subject then simply don't click on the thread. Problem solved!
I have had occasional disagreements with Mods on certain topics but, again, so what? We have different opinions. They think they are correct and I know better:)
In general it is fine to have a dissenting view so long as you don't get ugly about it.
 
But there are posts that are quite interesting and informative that get quickly locked here because they "Don't fit the forum context."

If we let everything that didn't fit the forum context, we might as well not have any forum context. We've let a lot of borderline off topic threads run until they get out of hand. But if there is going to be a context to THR then there has to be a line drawn somewhere.

The staff continually discusses these issues including getting a consensus if a borderline off topic thread should be allowed to run or not. Naturally all of the staff can't be online at once due to the fact that the real world intervenes, if while reading THR a staff member comes across a thread in a sub forum that isn't that moderator's assigned responsibility and closes the thread, there is always a notice posted for the moderator's responsible for that sub forum so they can review it. If you see a thread that was closed that you feel shouldn't have been, PM one of us. We will get you an answer.
 
(Hiding face...)

I've got quite an interest in 10m air pistol and rifle, and targettalk is the first site I look at; it usually doesn't take long since there aren't many additions daily. But THR is where I spend the most time, mostly reading as you can see by my post count, but this is the place I'll go when I have a pertinent question or comment. I read a couple of others but don't post anything, egos run wild on them quite often and I'm not into that.

I read THR for quite a while before it dawned on me why it's named "High Road" ------ duuuhhh! I just knew I liked it....... still do. Thanky!
 
Not going to claim I'm totally innocent.
I've received a few warnings when thing became "Heated". :D
I think I've got 2 pages worth of warnings for getting a little out of line. :)

Jrdolall made a very good point in post #28.
 
I used to stop in every day but now I just drop in every few months to see if there is anything interesting going on.

I think the mods on here are generally overzealous. Molding a discussion into what you think it should be is a slippery slope and I think some of the mods may have fallen down that slope.

You know the old crotchety guys at the range that mutter things to themselves and give you dirty looks because your fired two rounds in under two seconds? Yeah, that's how I feel when I am here.

To each his own though I guess.

I have found the tech forums on ar15.com and other places like waltherforums.com to be perfectly moderated.
 
The hardest forum I have ever been a member of is actually a very large gun forum for Indiana gun owners. You have to be VERY careful anytime you post or start a thread there and have skin as thick as an elephant. Many of the members there have that old attitude that their way is the model and if you don't agree then ......... well, better to just agree.
 
Life is short, getting jacked because of something you don't agree with gets posted on the net is a waste of time, ie a waste of your life.

and yes, I've wasted a lot of time too.
 
THR traffic seams to be slower than it used to be.... Slow threads seam to linger for weeks with few posts b4 they finally drop off the page.

Though I understand why the mods don't want THR loaded up with political vitriol, I find it rather naive to pretend that one of the major political parties isn't habitually anti 2A, and the other supportive. Kind of like the elephant in the room that we're supposed to pretend we don't see, but can't comment on.
 
THR traffic seams to be slower than it used to be.... Slow threads seam to linger for weeks with few posts b4 they finally drop off the page.

Though I understand why the mods don't want THR loaded up with political vitriol, I find it rather naive to pretend that one of the major political parties isn't habitually anti 2A, and the other supportive. Kind of like the elephant in the room that we're supposed to pretend we don't see, but can't comment on.


SSN Vet and I are seeing things pretty much the same.

This site used to be a lot more active, even when there were two sites.

I spend less time here because of the rules on using the "L" word and the subsequent infractions handed out when you cross their line. I suppose the owners think this site is going to convert them if we ignore reality.

I don't have any metrics, but I would say daily post counts are way down, based on my informal observations. I would also say the content of the posts, in some cases, has regressed.

I still check in here regularly, but don't post nearly as much. Time passes and tastes change, such is life. I am still a member here and am not a member of BARFCOM, "Snipers Hide" or other forums where the inmates run things and lose control on a regular basis. This site, for the most part, is generally speaking, well moderated.
 
Last edited:
The civility and "tight leash" here are two of the reasons I joined up, instead of just lurking.
I may not always agree with the mods; but this is not my house, and so I follow their rules.

I dont mind at all, a site chock full of real world knowledge and experience, that also throttles back the hostile a.d.d. that dominates most other places.

Thank You very much, gentlemen!
 
I think THR is a little too politically correct sometimes,. I had my hand slapped for capitalizing every letter in a post, for added emphasis. I was told that wasn't polite. I can say something isn't worth a you know what, but I can't type the first letter of that word followed by three dashes. Got a gig for doing that, too.

But I do enjoy this forum enormously. There are a lot of extremely intelligent people here that are well versed in history. And some of the disagreements between posters are hugely entertaining. A cat fight between CeeZee and Nom de Forum is a battle royal and informative as well. I learned quite a bit from both men. (CeeZee knows why I call it a "cat fight". Ask him.) I think either one of those two has forgotten more firearms history than I will ever know.

This is the first and only forum I have ever joined. I have no desire for any other.
 
THR traffic seams to be slower than it used to be.... Slow threads seam to linger for weeks with few posts b4 they finally drop off the page.

I think that might be the other edge of the sword under discussion: enforced politeness also means less lively discussions. Some like that; many might like the more user-controlled content found on other sites.

There's also a degree of insularity at play; those preferring the former type of discussion above tend to be one or more of the following: Republican, Pro-NRA, Christians. That's good for those people; they're the choir being preached to and obviously enjoy what they find here. But the heavy-handed moderation that keeps more space for those characteristics also doesn't do a whole lot to encourage diversity of ideas.

Edit: Example. In a thread about pastors carrying, comments questioning how a religious leader's considerations for carrying are any different from others who present in front of people get deleted. In a thread about civilians guarding non-base military locations, the word "tranny" gets thrown out casually. So, Christianity is protected and must be kept from offense, but a term that has increasing recognition as a pejorative for a transexual is acceptable. Kindly note that in providing this example I am describing THR culture and not saying what it should be, or that I personally am offended by either case. The site owners and moderators have and do continue to run THR as they see fit; these comments are just what I see here as a user.

Second edit: In a thread about veterans and PTSD, a random non-topical shot at "Hitlery." It's okay to call Democrats literally Hitler. What would happen if one were to make joking references to Republicans on topics like abortion or an over-the-top soundbite from the Christian right? Even if those quips fall short of calling the people in them (quite literally) Hitler, they'll be culled quite quickly.

Not only are those discussions made less lively, but they lose nuance.
 
Last edited:
psyopspec, your analysis seem pretty much on point. As I noted earlier, in the "old days" of this forum, discussion was much livelier, and there were certainly some more flamboyant personalities evident.

I also noted the "preaching to the choir" aspect which is far more obvious in threads touching on social issues whereas in the gun-specific sub-forums we see more of the actual experience and knowledge coming out (which are the forums in which I read more and post less).

The Rifle, Revolver, Hunting, Gunsmithing, Blackpowder and a couple of the other sub-forums are great examples of genial sharing without the condescension, smugness or elitist attitudes coming out which is so prevalent in many of the other internet firearms forums.
 
It is what it is.

I believe a lot more "real work" gets going on THR, than on other sites.

People who have experience to share and are willing to do it in a non-hostile, non-condescending, polite manner find a home here. People who have larger egos and bigger mouths than brains ... well, they don't. :)

Some people (like me) who kind of skirt the edge between those lines manage to hang on somehow. :evil:

As far as locked threads - I've talked with mods and actually got a couple of threads that were locked re-opened for additional discussion before. They're human, and can be reasoned with - as long as you don't pester them, and you have a good argument that something of substance and relevance can be added, or new information becomes available that changes the dynamic of the discussion that was locked down.

There's an immense amount of material on this forum - and some of that knowledge is even available from people who have passed away. Their knowledge and experience still exists here to help others. THR is kind of an evolving encyclopedia of sorts, if you can operate the search properly.

In my time on THR I've undoubtedly learned more about guns, reloading, ballistics, tactics, etc from this site; than from any other singular source.

Thank the mods, sure.

But don't forget to also thank yourselves, for contributing new information and experience. The mods (alone) didn't contribute all of the expertise that makes this site what it is.
 
The civility and "tight leash" here are two of the reasons I joined up, instead of just lurking.
I may not always agree with the mods; but this is not my house, and so I follow their rules.

I dont mind at all, a site chock full of real world knowledge and experience, that also throttles back the hostile a.d.d. that dominates most other places.

Thank You very much, gentlemen!
Well put.

And Trent too!
 
It is absolutely fine to disagree with someone on many different levels. So long as you do not insult them and remain civil. Insulting someone's belief system will not be tolerated no matter what that system my be. I have said time and time again that it is the members that make THR what it is by using the report button and bringing our attention to an issue. If ever you see something that does not seem right then by all means, report the post or thread.
 
Thanks Ryanxia.

I'd like to add that I'm living proof that you can get in to a heated argument on any particular topic, with a moderator, and not get banned. On occasion I've been known to do just that. :)

The key point is you have to remain civil and respectful in how you go about things. The moment you are debating something and resort to an ad hominem (attack the person instead of the argument) you cross to the wrong side of civility.

This is no different than any other avenue of polite discourse.

E.g. "You are an idiot if you think ..."

No.

"do I respect your opinion but I strongly disagree with you on these points..."

That's fine.


Another thing that gets people in over their head here is spouting off about things they are experts of... but only in their own mind. We have such a wide cross section of folks on this board, from all walks of life, that in any given conversation it is *highly* likely that someone way smarter on that particular topic will drop in. This is one area I screwed up on early on.

See, a lot of gun nuts get on the internet thinking they really, truly do know a lot about guns. And they very well might... about one or two things! But then they stick their nose in to a conversation that has drifted in to law, or tactics, or metallurgy, and find they are way out of their league.

That's when people get defensive, tempers start to show up, etc.

The thing I've learned over the years is to watch, read (listen), absorb what I've read, think about what people are really saying, and then contribute to the conversation if I have something which is meaningful to contribute.

You also need to have some humility - if you find yourself in a conversation with a person who really knows their stuff, and you are wrong, don't dig in your feet and argue just for the sake of saving face. That is a really bad idea around here, given the depth of knowledge some people have on THR.

THR doesn't play well to egomaniacs, know-it-alls, internet tough guys, etc. It fits in much better with those who are willing to accept "you know, I know quite a lot about X/Y/Z, but I can still learn more."

The difference in how you approach issues like that is fundamentally something that needs to be fixed on the inside of the person's though process, as at it's core, the types who usually don't do well here suffer from one or more logical / rational thought process disruptions. Those who can make the adjustment or are predisposed to rational dialog; they do better.

E.g. if discussing something where someone dropped an opinion you strongly disagree with, rather than ....

"Wow, that way is wrong, what you need to do is x/y/z"

Maybe come across as ...

"I usually go about that {this way}; is there a reason you do it {that other way}?"


I've learned a lot about guns on THR but I will tell you right now, that I have probably learned a whole lot more about how to be polite and have a rational discussion than I have about guns. I've always come across, in the past, as argumentative and condescending in my dialog, and the last couple of years, on here, I've really tried to come full circle. This board not only has taught me a great deal more about "gun stuff" but on a more fundamental level, it has changed the way I look at problems and approach life in general.

There's some good people here, and there's a lot to be learned - and not always about guns. :)
 
Psyopspec noted some common tendencies that will immediately turn off some newcomers. There's a lot of unintentional condescension as well, particularly with the references to the "sheeple," (can we just be done with that word?) which I got questioned about after I referred a friend to the site. As she stated, "Just because I don't carry a gun don't associate me with sheep." I realize that for many here, that word is associated with mindset, but it is too often used to tar those with whom they are not in agreement.

"Feral government," "Democrats," "liberals" and a few other terms that get bandied about don't exactly add points for those that use them ...

And Trent? Great pep-talk, but sometimes people who make stupid comments really need to be told they've made stupid comments ... (there are ways of respectfully doing this, but sometimes, sugar-coating things is really just further obscuring one's message).
 
So I crawled over to another gun forum to get some info and forgot how much bull goes around on other forums. Name calling, outbursts, not even bothering to read a post before thinking they know the answer.
[/B]

Welcome to a majority of the Internet.

Was your stay pleasant?

Edit: you can't argue facts or technical information. You can only argue opinions.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top