A show of Walkers

Status
Not open for further replies.
In the upper left of the page it read's 'attachments in process'. When I look in the delete box it read's that the upload is 'in progress'. I also named the pictures 'THR pictures'
instead of 'Walker's pictures' or something like that.
If anyone read's this could they please take a moment to let me know if I'vd done this right? I do understand that lot's of people take up to 24 hours to get pictures posted to your site..Thanks very much...Okay...
 
In regard to my picture. In the upper left hand of the page it read's 'attachments' in process' In the delete box (I did NOT delete) it says something about 30 jpg and to the right it read's 'in progress'.
I do understand that some websites take up to 24 hours to post uploaded pics.
If anyone read's this post can you please let me know if I have done this right.
Also, in the window that open's up for deletion I can click on the thumbnail and see my picture.
One more thing. I did not and don't know how to specify a certain thread. I did this on 'A show of Walkers', and am just assuming this is where the photographs will post.
ANY HELP WOULD BE APPRECIATED...Okay...
 
hi all, good lord willing Mrs Clause will be getting me one for christmas, So I hope to be posting mine on the 26th. good day all, Bob
 
.44walkersabot - I don't recognize the page or the process you are describing, so I'm probably not going to be much help. However, I'll try.

THR provides 2 ways to post pictures that I know of:

1) insert the image into the body of the message (in this case the image appears full size in the text at the location it was inserted and the viewer need do nothing to see it).

2) attach the image as a file (in which case it appears as a thumbnail on the bottom and the viewer must click on it to view the full size image)

To use the image insertion method (1) you must use a third party site that allows you to upload files for storage and allows the forum servers to access the files at any time without a password. An example would be www.photobucket.com, the site that I use. You must register with their site, then you upload the picture file. Once uploaded the images appear on the site as a thumbnail with three options beneath. Clicking on the Img code option copies the address of the image into your computer's memory. You then return to the message you are composing, click in the message where you want the image to appear and then select Edit/Paste in your browser's task bar. The url address of the image will appear between two img codes. When you post the message the image will appear in that place.

To use the attachment method (2) you click on the Manage Attachments box in the Attach Files box below the composition window. A window will open that allows you to upload the from either your computer directly or from a third party source (the url option). You click the Browse button and use the file location window to locate and select your file for upload, then click on Upload. When done uploading the files, select Close This Window and you will be returned to your message composition window. The image file will appear by name in the Attach Files box below the composition window. When you post your message the attached image file appears as a thumbnail at the bottom of the posted message; anyone who wants to view the full image must click on the thumbnail.

Hope that helps.
 
Mr. MyKeal, thanks. This is what I have so far. On the page that say's 'browse' right down below it is a thumbnail. I clicked on it and it's my picture so I know it's in there, but I just can't figure for the life of me how to transfer that thumbnail to the thread. (or transfer it anywhere for that matter)
I sent Hildo an e-mail with two of my pictures. He said he will get them on there for me.
They're not real good pictures. I should have taken my time and made everything look a little more neat, but it's a start anyway.
On Jan. the 3rd I order the Third. Now all I have to is decide if I want the civilian model or the military model. Thanks again...Okay...Hey, I'm going to try inserting the picture into the text like you just told me and see how it goes right now...Okay...
 
If you upload images to the Highroad and want to display them on this site, while you are at the attachments screen, right click on the pic you uploaded, then tell it to copy link location. Then use the Insert Image button and paste the link. Thats how I do it.
 
Well, I give up. I have been at it all damn day. I have no trouble uploading photos to other sites. To hell with it. I changed both of my e-mails and I'm going to forget about posting pics.
Hildo's running around out there somewhere with two of my pictures. He sent me an e-mail and told me to e-mail the photos to him and he would take care of it. Well, if it get's taken care of he'll do it...Okay...
 
Look, anybody,, On the page that show's the 'browse' in the upper left hand corner, it says. 'uploaf=d file from computer. I have done that. NOW, right below that it sya upload from URL. Now, right below that is a small thumbnail that I just can't figure out how to get it on the thread, I can't move it anywhere. All I can do is just open it and look at it Does anyone have any ideas on how to transfer the image onto 'Show of Walkers'? The 'paste' is grayed out and I can't use it...Okay...
 
Just close the window

When the thumbnail appears in the window that means that the image file is attached to the message you are composing. Just click on the "Close Window" button. You don't need to transfer it anywhere.

After the window closes you will then see that the thumbnail is in the Attach Files box beneath the area where you type the message text. When you complete typing your message, click on Submit just like you normally do. The thumbnail will appear at the bottom of the posted message, available for viewers to click on and see the image.
 

Attachments

  • badger.jpg
    badger.jpg
    121.9 KB · Views: 51
Okay, let's see what it's going to do here.






Alright Mr. MyKeal!!!You'vd got it together ol' son! Thanks a lot. My main problem was I wasn't putting a message in the box...Okay...Damn! This was a lot of work. I had one more picture but I think I'll rest with what I'vd got so far. That's a pretty mean looking creature you'vd got there Mr. MyKeal. Impressive...Okay...
 
Last edited:
"2)First model Dragoon cylinder & barrel will fit the Walker frame, but none of the others will because of the location and configuration of the cylinder bolt stop on the 2nd and 3rd models."

I believe this is incorrect. Dragoons have shorter cylinders. The shorter cylinder length was one of the changes that were evident in all Dragoon models, and helped to reduce the weight.

The First Model Dragoon cylinder will fit only a First Model Dragoon frame. It is too short to fit a Walker frame and the cylinder stop notches are not correct for the other Dragoons.


These statements are incorrect. In fact, except for the oval grip cut-out in the Walker frame, and the 2nd $ 3rd model's cylinder stop bolts, the Walker and Dragoon frames are exactly the same . The first Dragoons (the "Whitneyville" or "transition" models) were nothing more than modified Walkers, built with new cylinders and barrels using stock-on-hand and frames from Walkers returned to Colt for repair (usually due to burst cylinders). The so-called "First Model" Dragoons continued this with the difference being the elimination of the above mentioned grip cut-out.The cylinder was shortened, yes, but the forcing cone was extended on the barrel to make up the difference (which is why I said "cylinder and barrel"). Both Colt and the modern Italian makers use combinations of Walker frames and First Model Dragoon cylinders and barrels to make up their "Whitneyville" Dragoons.

In fact, I have both a Walker and First Model Dragoon, and have successfully made a "Transition Model" using combinations of the two...

Also, I'd have to see some verification of the Walker originally being set up as a carbine with a .54 calibre ball. According to my information, it was always intended as a six-shot hand gun using a .44 calibre 220 grain "elongated ball".
 
Last edited:
I know it's a new one on me about the '47 being originally designed as a .54 carbine, but I don't study this sort of stuff too much. But I HAVE read everything on the computer that I could find about the Walker. Ever since it started a fire for me that first time and warmed my freezing ass up and made me a pot of hot tea (tea is better in cold country) me and that Walker have been real good buddies. I even tried to read all about it in the Texas Ranger Dispatch Magazine. I know how Walker decided he needed a more powerful handgun and he and Colt got together (probably over a bottle of whiskey)and planned and schemed it out. Everything I have found simply re-inforces the fact that it is what it is, and I have never found anything to suggest that it is was ever intended to be anything other than what it is.
Of course I may not have the complete story either but I know this--In any situation if you take away everything that you know cannot be, then whatever you're left with must be the truth...Okay...
 
Also, I'd have to see some verification of the Walker originally being set up as a carbine with a .54 calibre ball. According to my information, it was always intended as a six-shot hand gun using a .44 calibre 220 grain "elongated ball".
The Walker being originally planned as a 53 caliber is a known fact not in dispute among serious students of Colt C&B Firearms.
Look at the breech end of the Walker barrel and you will note that the barrel is actually bored off center with the bore inclined upwards till it comes out centered at the muzzle.
This was because Colt had already set up the machinery for the .53 Barrel blanks before abandoning the .53 caliber idea for a more sensible .44 caliber.
Ive seen detailed sketches of the rebated cylinder .53 action.
As I said the .53 design is well known among Colt firearms researchers. Not so well known that everyone who collects the Colts knows about it though.
.54 caliber horse pistols and single shot pistol carbines were a standard issue before the Colts caught on.


Whether it was developed from a carbine design or not is my own speculation based on anomalies of the Walker's grip design, and the fact that Patterson Carbines were already in use with the US Army at the time.
The action size and the scallop cut in the frame look more suitable for a carbine.

Walker wanted a powerful .44 Caliber revolver as quickly as possible and Colt adapted parts of the .53 experimental to the job.

Problems with the early Colt metalurgy made even the Walker dangerous at times. Many ended up with cracked cylinders or barrel. A .53 gun would have been an accident waiting to happen.
Colt later obtained rights to a Molybdenum alloy meant for leaf spring and built his large caliber revolvers from this new "Colt Silver Spring Steel" from then on.


PS
Here is a .54 revolver Carbine buit by a competitor . I expect that a .53 Colt Carbine would have been similar in proportions and deployed in the same manner as his Patterson Carbines.
The Paterson carbines were overly complicated and expensive so an improved carbine built on the Colt redesign would have been welcomed by the military at the time.
http://airbornecombatengineer.typepad.com/airborne_combat_engineer/2006/09/rare_1853_revol.html

PPS
Took a quick run through of available information on the net.
All I've found so far is that Blunt&Symes built the first Walker Prototype for Colt and theres a surviving prototype barrel which has no loading lever, being meant to be loaded using a hand held rod with palm rest, like the Trapper Colt 36.

The best Colt reference book at our local library was vandalized by some yahoo with a razor who cut out dozens of photos of the rare Colts found there. I don't know where I could find any information on the prototypes locally.

I'll Check my old American Rifleman Magazines later, perhaps theres an article in one of those.
 
Last edited:
I swapped my picture around. It's not much better but I don't have much room in here to make a nice background.
I'm guessing that the Third Model will have a little more jump with that shorter barrel. Well, I probably won't shoot it a whole hell of a lot anyway.Well, anyway...Okay...
 
Last edited:
In fact, except for the oval grip cut-out in the Walker frame, and the 2nd $ 3rd model's cylinder stop bolts, the Walker and Dragoon frames are exactly the same ...The cylinder was shortened, yes, but the forcing cone was extended on the barrel to make up the difference

I learn something new every day. You are correct, sir, and I apologize for my ignorance. Attached picture is my Walker (bottom) against my 2nd Dragoon (both Ubertis). To be honest, I knew that the Dragoon 'forcing cone' was longer but I didn't believe it was enough to make up the difference in cylinder length. Clearly, it is.
 

Attachments

  • R0013016.JPG
    R0013016.JPG
    30 KB · Views: 63
Hey sir, can you tell me where to go to find out about where they were talking in the beginning about the Walker being a carbine? As you know, the Walker is my favorite revolver and I read just about everything I can find about it. I'vd never heard this before but there's a lot of stuff in this world I haven't heard about. Any help would be appreciated...Okay...
 
Last edited:
Hey I went to that site for a moment and looked at th .53 carbine. It sort of look's, especially at first glance, that it COULD be a distant relative of the Walker as I know it.
What'e that cylinder made out of? It look's like it could be brass or maybe even bronze, just to look at it while that old man's holding it...Okay...
 
I went to the Colt Collection at the Hartford, CT State Library a few months ago and they have some really different prototypes on display. They have a revolving .70 caliber rifle that was never produced because ---yep, it was too big. It's a monster. They have original Patersons, pre-Patersons, Paterson revolving rifles, a Walker, and they did have a pre-Walker but I don't remember too much about it (couldn't stop my head from spinning).
They had an 1860 Army, round barrel, with the Navy hinged loading lever. They had a Dragoon with a top strap (like the Remington), a Dragoon revolving rifle, and lots more that I have forgotten about.
If you ever get the chance to visit that collection, do it.
 
Evening, Mr. Pohill..A .70 caliber revolving rifle huh? Well, I don't want to shoot it! I'd like to see it though. That thing's probably got a bore a full grown field rat could crawl through...Hell, run through.
I'd like to see that Dragoon with the top strap. I wonder how come they didn't try to produce it?
I would bet the surviving prototype barrel with no loadingl ever that Mr. Roswell '47 was speaking of is absolutely priceless on it's own.
Some of this stuff is so interesting to me. Up in the particular part of the country where I'vd been living there is no internet coverage, no cable, no air cards (data cards) just nothing. XM Radio came in real good, and T.V., and I could make a phone call off of my 2 meter if the weather would let me reach a repeater. (the 2 meter has dtmf tones in the face of the mic.) Work's good when it's working. Well, anyway...Okay...
 
This is the library in CT that I visited. I tried to find a list of everything they have on display but found nothing. I might contact them and see if they have some info they can send me. Or, I'll just go back to Hartford and spent a few more hours drooling.
Wyoming? I lived in SLC for awhile. Beautiful area.

http://www.cslib.org/coltarms.htm

Oh yeah - the only guns I got to touch were two Gatling guns.
 
Afternoon Bigbadgun..How you doing today?
Yeah, I want to be buried with mine. (my sister think's I'm crazy since I told her that!)
I am really learning a lot just reading and talking on this site, and I'm enjoying it.
You know, if anyone would have asked me two weeks ago about the Walker, I would have assured them I knew everything there was to know about it, right down to exactly how much it weighed loaded all the way around with 48 grains of Trifle Seven 3f and .457 balls. It just goes to show you I guess.
How you coming along about your little carbine?Hey, let me ask you a question. (the thumbnail of your carbine made me just think of it. Is there some setting I can use to make one of my thumbnails come up every time I post? Right now, the only way I can get to it is to go to 'manage attachsments', 'browse'. pick my picture and click on it. Then I click 'select', then 'upload', and it will try to upload and then tell me that the file is already assigned to 'Show of Walkers'. There will appear a thumbnail right above the left corner of the manage attachments and it will work for one post and then it leaves. I was thinking maybe that one of those things at the top like 'insert image' might work but I haven't tried it yet. Well, anyway...Okay...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top