Schleprok62
Member
OK, I've read many a thread where the question is asked which is better... Now that I have some time on my hands, I will run down the my opinion of the real, practical differences. I am not an expert by any stretch of the imagination... I'll leave the hard core questions for those more qualified to answer.
I will not do a comparative range report because comapring a 7mm-08 to a 30-06 is like comparing apples to oranges... (in my opinion) I will say that both rifles are definitely in the 1 MOA playground out of the box... ok, on with the show...
I've read people say that the stock on the Marlin is better than the stock on the Stevens: Well, what do y'all think?? Stevens Left - Marlin Right
Stevens: Notice the flash line...
Marlin: Nice and smoothy...
When comparing fit and finish, I'd definitely say the Marlin wins, but comparing how well built one or the other is, I'd have to lean toward the Stevens... The Stevens has a fitted block of styrofoam inside the buttstock whereas the Marlin uses a cheesy piece of folded packing material like sheet of expanded foam -
Triggers: Well, this are is pretty much a no brainer... The Marlin definitely has the better trigger... Although, the Stevens can be, at little to no cost, adjusted to be a lot better than the factory setting. The Marlin uses a system very much like the Accutrigger of the Savages... Easily adjusts with common household tools.
Stevens:
Marlin:
OK, next up we have the recoil pad... The Marlin has a nice cushy one, where the Stevens has on that leaves a little to be desired, although, a 7mm-08 Rem doesn't recoil quite as hard as a 30-06 Sprg.
Free-float: Hmmm... this is a no brainer either... The Stevens get's the thumb-up here...
Barrel crown: This is a toss-up to me... as long as the crown is in good shape it should make little difference... But we all have preferences.
Stevens on top:
The bolts... Well, to me it looks like the Stevens bolt get's the nod here. The name is etched on it... and the Marlin's looks like it could use a bit more attention to detail, and/or refined. This is probably just cosmetic, and probably has liittle to no affect on the rifles ability to do what it was intended to do... But I like the cleaner looking Stevens...
OK... that's pretty much it in a nutshell... For whatever it's worth, I don't see any real, practical differences to say one is that much better or worse than the other... Those looking at these two rifles should give them both a good looking at... But when it comes down to the nuts and bolts of it either of them... you're getting a lot of rifle for your hard earned money. If I was to have to recommend one over the other, I'd have to lean toward the Stevens, but only because the is a vast aftermarket for stocks and barrels available for it... via the Savage 10/110 parts bins... Other than that... flip a coin... The choice is easily clear as mud on a rainy day...
One other note: The Stevens is a bit lighter than the Marlin...
I hope this presentation and mild comparison has helped everyone in some way... Cheers... and always good shooting and be safe...
Tom
I will not do a comparative range report because comapring a 7mm-08 to a 30-06 is like comparing apples to oranges... (in my opinion) I will say that both rifles are definitely in the 1 MOA playground out of the box... ok, on with the show...
I've read people say that the stock on the Marlin is better than the stock on the Stevens: Well, what do y'all think?? Stevens Left - Marlin Right
Stevens: Notice the flash line...
Marlin: Nice and smoothy...
When comparing fit and finish, I'd definitely say the Marlin wins, but comparing how well built one or the other is, I'd have to lean toward the Stevens... The Stevens has a fitted block of styrofoam inside the buttstock whereas the Marlin uses a cheesy piece of folded packing material like sheet of expanded foam -
Triggers: Well, this are is pretty much a no brainer... The Marlin definitely has the better trigger... Although, the Stevens can be, at little to no cost, adjusted to be a lot better than the factory setting. The Marlin uses a system very much like the Accutrigger of the Savages... Easily adjusts with common household tools.
Stevens:
Marlin:
OK, next up we have the recoil pad... The Marlin has a nice cushy one, where the Stevens has on that leaves a little to be desired, although, a 7mm-08 Rem doesn't recoil quite as hard as a 30-06 Sprg.
Free-float: Hmmm... this is a no brainer either... The Stevens get's the thumb-up here...
Barrel crown: This is a toss-up to me... as long as the crown is in good shape it should make little difference... But we all have preferences.
Stevens on top:
The bolts... Well, to me it looks like the Stevens bolt get's the nod here. The name is etched on it... and the Marlin's looks like it could use a bit more attention to detail, and/or refined. This is probably just cosmetic, and probably has liittle to no affect on the rifles ability to do what it was intended to do... But I like the cleaner looking Stevens...
OK... that's pretty much it in a nutshell... For whatever it's worth, I don't see any real, practical differences to say one is that much better or worse than the other... Those looking at these two rifles should give them both a good looking at... But when it comes down to the nuts and bolts of it either of them... you're getting a lot of rifle for your hard earned money. If I was to have to recommend one over the other, I'd have to lean toward the Stevens, but only because the is a vast aftermarket for stocks and barrels available for it... via the Savage 10/110 parts bins... Other than that... flip a coin... The choice is easily clear as mud on a rainy day...
One other note: The Stevens is a bit lighter than the Marlin...
I hope this presentation and mild comparison has helped everyone in some way... Cheers... and always good shooting and be safe...
Tom
Last edited: