Actually, I haven't seen any evidence yet that Oswald was the only shooter.
What they try to do is discredit any arguments that he *wasn't*.
That's not the same as showing he was.
For instance, the single bullet theory tries to explain two wounds with one shot, to allow the possibility the LHO was the single shooter.
But the wounds could have come from two bullets fired from different directions, at different times, and the bullet that people think missed might have been the one that hit Connelly. There could have been another shooter under the SBT.
The SBT merely allows the possibility (if you believe it) that LHO acted alone.
You see what I'm saying? They assume LHO acted alone and then try to prove he *could* have done it alone. But in doing so, they don't disprove the possibility that he wasn't acting alone.
I don't want to lay out the whole argument. I've made some points here and I've just gotten tired of it all. I don't see how Oswald could have known what the parade route was to get the job in advance, especially if the route was changed at the last minute. (And if it wasn't change,d the number of people in dealy plaza would have been much higher).
The headshot looks to me to have come from the grassy knoll, given the way the blood splattered. Etc.
I'm certainly not saying I know what happened, or how it happened- I can't give you a timeline and try to defend it. I don't know what happened. I'm just pointing out problems with the official story.
But by definition, since the government covered up evidence, there was a conspiracy... and I'm not just talking about the records that were sealed.
What they try to do is discredit any arguments that he *wasn't*.
That's not the same as showing he was.
For instance, the single bullet theory tries to explain two wounds with one shot, to allow the possibility the LHO was the single shooter.
But the wounds could have come from two bullets fired from different directions, at different times, and the bullet that people think missed might have been the one that hit Connelly. There could have been another shooter under the SBT.
The SBT merely allows the possibility (if you believe it) that LHO acted alone.
You see what I'm saying? They assume LHO acted alone and then try to prove he *could* have done it alone. But in doing so, they don't disprove the possibility that he wasn't acting alone.
I don't want to lay out the whole argument. I've made some points here and I've just gotten tired of it all. I don't see how Oswald could have known what the parade route was to get the job in advance, especially if the route was changed at the last minute. (And if it wasn't change,d the number of people in dealy plaza would have been much higher).
The headshot looks to me to have come from the grassy knoll, given the way the blood splattered. Etc.
I'm certainly not saying I know what happened, or how it happened- I can't give you a timeline and try to defend it. I don't know what happened. I'm just pointing out problems with the official story.
But by definition, since the government covered up evidence, there was a conspiracy... and I'm not just talking about the records that were sealed.
