I've exchanged emails with ABC24 before, and I believe it was with Mr. Turpin, although I can't confirm that since I've deleted the emails long ago. I had commented negatively on a story on much the same basis as I'm dissappointed now. Unfortunately, the quality of the reporting has not much improved in the intervening time. For example, in this instance, "experts" are mentioned several times, but none are ever cited by name or directly interviewed. At no point did they interview on camera a self-defense expert, a firearms expert, or even a police officer. What we do get is a kid from a paintball park discussing the difficulty of hitting someone from 30 feet away with not a paintball gun, which he might know something about, but a real pistol, with which he clearly has little experience.
This particular group seems to have forgotten that credibility is earned, not just free for the taking. When you mention experts in a news story,
quote at least one directly. Otherwise, the reporter may as well be expressing her opinion on the matter.
TV news is way down the track of "fluff over substance," and the ABC/UPN group (same folks) and the Fox affiliate are the worst here. We get reporters dodging paintballs rather than calmly talking to someone who might really know something about self-defense. It's at its most harmful when it's dealing with a subject that can truly have life-and-death consequences.
I do agree with the overall point of the piece--I'm honestly glad to see something other than the "just do what they tell you" garbage usually espoused by the media. But the quality of the piece was just terrible. To me, it was more about showmanship and cheap images than the quality of the journalism. True journalism is dying fast in this country, and it's ultimately the viewers who suffer due to the lack of real, useful information. It's why I don't watch the news on TV much at all, unless it's The Daily Show.