Smaug
Member
First off, let me tell you that I know the SKS was not designed to be super-accurate. I know it was designed as a super-reliable combat rifle. If some clown posts that "it is a combat rifle and not meant to be that accurate" I'm going to light off on him, hehehe.
I'm curious though: what kind of groups can I expect from a bench at 100 yards? (I have a Yugoslavian SKS on the way)
I'm going to have a receiver cover scope, a 4x32. If that doesn't work too well, I will bit the bullet and drill and tap the receiver for a proper mount. I have read at Surplusrifle.com that the receiver cover mounted scopes don't work that well, but his targets from the solid-mounted scope didn't look any better to me...
How will the accuracy of Wolf bulk ammo compare to good handloads which I may press?
If it groups 3-4" at 100 yd with Wolf, I would think I could squeeze 2" with handloads. Does that sound reasonable or is the SKS just not up to the task?
I'm curious though: what kind of groups can I expect from a bench at 100 yards? (I have a Yugoslavian SKS on the way)
I'm going to have a receiver cover scope, a 4x32. If that doesn't work too well, I will bit the bullet and drill and tap the receiver for a proper mount. I have read at Surplusrifle.com that the receiver cover mounted scopes don't work that well, but his targets from the solid-mounted scope didn't look any better to me...
How will the accuracy of Wolf bulk ammo compare to good handloads which I may press?
If it groups 3-4" at 100 yd with Wolf, I would think I could squeeze 2" with handloads. Does that sound reasonable or is the SKS just not up to the task?