Robert Hairless
Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2003
- Messages
- 3,983
The world isn't round. Technically, it's an oblate spheroid.
If you know the term "oblate spheroid" I know all I need to know about you.
The world isn't round. Technically, it's an oblate spheroid.
I was awake during 8th grade earth science?If you know the term "oblate spheroid" I know all I need to know about you.
Following this logic then the NRA supports murderers, armed robbers, and terrorists. The ACLU support freedom of speech but doesn't support or condone the actions of pedophiles, etc anymore than the NRA supports those who use their 2nd amendment freedoms for the wrong thing. Say whatever you like no matter how despicable it may be, but when you harm others you are responsible. Buy whatever gun you like no matter how evil and scary looking, but when you harm others you are responsible for it.One judges a man by the company he keeps.
The ACLU supports child pornographers, pedophiles, rapists and terrorists.
Make your own decision.
No, they simply promote pedophiles to high positions...The ACLU support freedom of speech but doesn't support or condone the actions of pedophiles
No, they simply promote pedophiles to high positions...
I do hope the recent ruling causes them to change their stance, but I will still support them regardless.
I'm not sure how thats related, it says the term of his presidency was from 2002 to 2005 and his arrest and conviction of child pornography was in 2007. No doubt there are some bad guys in any organization given enough size. How were the members of the virginia chapter supposed to know of his illegal and abusive sexual tendencies before his arrest? Do the people of any clubs or organizations you belong to know of your sexual likes or desires?No, they simply promote pedophiles to high positions...
I will continue to support the ACLU's work as long as they don't take any actions to harm the 2nd amendment though.
No, they simply promote pedophiles to high positions...
June 29th, 2008 at 9:41 pm
The ACLU interprets the Second Amendment as a collective right. Therefore, we disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision in D.C. v. Heller. While the decision is a significant and historic reinterpretation of the right to keep and bear arms, the decision leaves many important questions unanswered that will have to be resolved in future litigation, including what regulations are permissible, and which weapons are embraced by the Second Amendment right that the Court has now recognized.
Soybomb, do youth sports teams support and defend NAMBLA?
No, I didn't think so.
The ACLU has
So you don't see a distinction between defending free speech and defending the words that are said with it? It seems to me that we need groups like the ACLU who are willing to go to bat for free speech even if what is being said is terrible. We certainly expect our 2nd amendment organizations to take a hard line of supporting the most unpopular weapons to the fullest extent possible. Why should we have a double standard with the 1st amendment?Soybomb, do youth sports teams support and defend NAMBLA?
No, I didn't think so.
The ACLU has
if you are supporting them, you are part of the problem and a disgrace to Ronald Reagan's name.