henschman
Member
Wow, my hat is off to the ACLU of South Dakota. I have always criticized the ACLU for being a group that purports to be pro-liberty, but ends up slicing liberty up into the part it supports and the part it doesn't. They are big on privacy rights and the right to be free from unjustified searches/seizures, etc., but they have not been big supporters of economic freedom or the right to self defense. It is good to hear that this may be changing a little bit, at least in one state. It would be great if they would be consistent on their protection of privacy and joing some of these suits against obamacare, too.
Unfortunately, I now have to add the GOA to the category of organizations that are inconsistent in their defense of liberty.
I guess when it comes to the issue of prohibiting gun ownership to non-citizens, the question is whether liberty is natural, inalienable, and inherent in all individuals; or whether it is something that those in power may choose to grant to those whom they see fit.
Unfortunately, I now have to add the GOA to the category of organizations that are inconsistent in their defense of liberty.
I guess when it comes to the issue of prohibiting gun ownership to non-citizens, the question is whether liberty is natural, inalienable, and inherent in all individuals; or whether it is something that those in power may choose to grant to those whom they see fit.