Adjustable Revolver Sights yes or no?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I prefer adjustable sights, but I have noticed a tendency for the screws to work loose on a couple of my older guns.
Of your three choices I would go with the model 15, because it is on my want list. YMMV.
 
Between the Model 10 and 15 I would go with the 15. I have both and shoot the 15 more because it is more versatile. If you do decide to carry a 4" revolver just look for a holster that covers the rear sight like a speed scabbard. BTW $265 is a great price on a Model 15 if the condition is good. If they are beat up I would go with the gun in the best condition. Use the revolver check out sticky at the top of the revolver section. Good Luck, Bill
 
In addition to those times I'm target shooting or just "plinking", I prefer adjustable sights on any handgun that I carry holstered, whether carrying it for hunting or for self-defense. The only times I prefer fixed sights are those occasions when I may have to draw from a concealed/covered location (pocket, ankle, sob, iwb, etc.) or if I have the gun for its "historical" character (i.e., a sa revolver for use in cowboy action shoots, etc.).
Because I reload a lot and use different powder amounts/bullet weights in various configurations, an adjustable sight is the only practical solution for accomodating poa with poi when shooting different loads in the same handgun.
Finally, short of the severe use one might expect if a pistol is being used for military duty or SWAT team assignments, in my experience (which includes thirty years of le employment), adjustable sights aren't nearly as fragile as some people make them out to be.
 
IMHO, adjustability is a distant second on its list of advantages over fixed sights, first being its vastly superior sight picture. No less evident anywhere than on your average SAA-type single action. If more of them were like the old dovetail rear sight Single Sixes, I'd have a lot more of them. As is, most my sixguns wear adjustable sights.
 
Let me tell you a story. Some while back, I got a great deal on a Colt New Service --$300. The gun was in great shape, but had been reblued so was no longer a collector's item. No matter, I wanted a shooter.

The front sight on this gun was about as thick as a razor blade, with a rear sight to match. It shot 18" high and 12" left. How the heck do you fix that?

I finally pulled the original sight off and soldered on a great honkin' 1/8" thick slab of steel. I made it way too high, and loaded up a bunch of ammo, and started shooting. I would shoot several groups and measure each hole based on the aiming point, then establish mean point of impact statistically, and file off metal.

I finally got the elevation right, but it was still shooting about 12" left. So I took a needle file and started opening up the rear sight groove, filing away the right side only -- in effect adjusting the sight to the right.

It took about a month and about 600 rounds of ammo to get it right.

Now ask me if adjustable sights are worth the money.:fire:
 
It depends on how you plan to use the gun. Since all you mention is target shooting, then adjustable sights are strongly recommended. If it's concealed carry then fixed sights would be the way to go.

In short if it's important that the gun shoot exactly to point of aim, get adjustables. If close enough is good enough and ruggedness is more important than pinpoint accuracy, get fixed.
 
it is not brainwashing, it is getting your mind right
I now own considerably more revolvers than pistols. I like the variety of calibers available. Love the .45 Colt and, for some reason, love revolvers chambered to the .38 Special or .357 Mag. even though I don't care that much about either round. Most of them are fixed sight, but lately I've gravitated toward adjustable sights as much because I can see the notch better as for the adjustability.
 
My S&W M10, M36 & my Ruger SP101 are plenty accurate w/o adjustable sights.

I also have a Blackhawk & M66 w/ adjustable sights. They're OK, but I like the cleaner look of the fixed sights.

The reason I bought the Blackhawk instead of a Vaquero is $$.
And I'd prefer to have a M65 instead of the 66.
 
From a practical point of view, I seldom adjust the sights on adjustable sighted revolvers. So there is little real gain for me. I tend to buy revolvers with adjustable sights when I intend to shoot longer distances on a regular basis. You never know.
 
BTW $265 is a great price on a Model 15 if the condition is good.

Amen to that! Buyer beware, though. I don't like ordering stuff sight unseen. I bought a M1917 20 years ago for 100 bucks supposed to be in NRA good, shootable. It was not shootable. I had to have a smith work it over and he told me to "take it easy on the old gal", which I did. I woulda kept that old gun, looked okay with bluing wear, but for the fact that it didn't shoot cast bullets worth a toot. I probably shoulda kept it anyway just for what it was, but sold it.
 
Buyer beware, though

good advice

this is a reputable fellow with whom I have dealt before.

The final price will add 20 bucks for shipping and 10 to my FFL, so 295 is the bottom line.

(BTW, THR member Waterhouse does $10 transfers in Round Rock Texas. REALLY nice guy)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top