fletcher
Member
After quite a bit of research and reading countless threads, I have managed to narrow my selection down to the following two: Ruger GP-100 and Taurus PT911. I've heard nothing but praise for either. So, I'm having a bit of trouble deciding between these and would like input from anyone who can help. I intend for this gun to be multi-purpose for plinking/carry/HD.
As I understand, the GP-100 has the advantage of reliability, durability, and simplicity (as well as being able to accept wider hollow points as a revolver, and can use .38 or .357). However, people speak of it as being large and heavy. Unforunately, I didn't see one at the store here (PDHSC for anyone in Raleigh area), so I really couldn't get an idea of this for myself.
As for the PT911, it is DA/SA (I like that), is capable of holding 15 rounds, thinner/shorter/lighter, and therefore significantly easier to conceal. Also, in the event something happens to it, Taurus has the lifetime warranty. I do not know how Ruger's compares.
Carry is the primary factor in the choice. They are only $30 different in price, so I'm not concerned with that as a factor.
Does anyone have personal experiences owning/carrying either of these two? How easily are they concealed? What holster(s) do you use? For the GP-100, is the 3" or 4" barrel model better for multi-purpose?
If you have pictures of your carry method (especially for the GP-100), can you post them or send them to me?
I appreciate any help. Thanks for reading
--
Fletcher
As I understand, the GP-100 has the advantage of reliability, durability, and simplicity (as well as being able to accept wider hollow points as a revolver, and can use .38 or .357). However, people speak of it as being large and heavy. Unforunately, I didn't see one at the store here (PDHSC for anyone in Raleigh area), so I really couldn't get an idea of this for myself.
As for the PT911, it is DA/SA (I like that), is capable of holding 15 rounds, thinner/shorter/lighter, and therefore significantly easier to conceal. Also, in the event something happens to it, Taurus has the lifetime warranty. I do not know how Ruger's compares.
Carry is the primary factor in the choice. They are only $30 different in price, so I'm not concerned with that as a factor.
Does anyone have personal experiences owning/carrying either of these two? How easily are they concealed? What holster(s) do you use? For the GP-100, is the 3" or 4" barrel model better for multi-purpose?
If you have pictures of your carry method (especially for the GP-100), can you post them or send them to me?
I appreciate any help. Thanks for reading
--
Fletcher