Bazoo
Member
I preciate the tips on burnishing.
We're not talking about 20yrs of holster wear on your carry piece. Sorry but none of us will live long enough to put this kind of wear on anything. As I already said, the new stuff doesn't wear like the old stuff did anyway. Would this rifle have the same appeal if it looked like a brand new standard production gun? No, it would look like a brand new production gun. It's the aging process that gives it such rich character. Without it, it'd be just like any other. There's a reason why 90% of hand built flintlocks have some level of aging on them. Take the beadwork from Chuck Burrows for example, were it not for the aging, it would look like a cheap tourist trinket.I agree with BobWright---I am entrenched in the camp that feels firearms and holsters (motorcycles and hot rods too) have to earn their
bumps and bruisers through honest wear and tear. One of the silliest things I have seen was a guy bragging how he spent a couple of
thousand to have his bike painted and then sanded it down to make it look weathered.
We're not talking about 20yrs of holster wear on your carry piece. Sorry but none of us will live long enough to put this kind of wear on anything. As I already said, the new stuff doesn't wear like the old stuff did anyway. Would this rifle have the same appeal if it looked like a brand new standard production gun? No, it would look like a brand new production gun. It's the aging process that gives it such rich character. Without it, it'd be just like any other. There's a reason why 90% of hand built flintlocks have some level of aging on them. Take the beadwork from Chuck Burrows for example, were it not for the aging, it would look like a cheap tourist trinket.
View attachment 1054623