benEzra
Moderator Emeritus
Might want to read up on your Russian World War II history a bit. The WWI Russian Army under the czar was indeed largely uneducated-peasant. The Soviet Army in 1947 or 1949 most assuredly was not.Which at the time was made up of poor ignorant farmers. Watch any special with M. Kalashnikov in it, he himself said he the army wanted something simple in design that even a idiot couldn't break.
FWIW, would you consider Vasily Zaytsev, Simo Häyhä, and Carlos Hathcock "peasants"? All three were from rural areas in their respective countries, but none of them were uneducated, and they all darn sure knew their way around a rifle.
I'm sure Mr. Kalashnikov did want the rifle to be idiot-proof. There was, and is, a percentage of idiots in the Russian military, just as there is in the U.S. military. But that doesn't mean idiots are anything but a small minority in either case.
You've never shot one, I take it.lol, its refreshing to see someone not tiptoe around the touchy subject of just how bad the ak's really are.
ive never personally seen one group well enough to even shoot on the hundred yard line, unless hitting the paper is good enough.
at 200 and up, forget about it.
The AK is an easy rifle to shoot badly, partly because the can't-stay-on-paper-at-200 myth is self-fulfilling (if you don't shoot it like you expect to get 4 MOA out of it, then you most assuredly won't), and partly because the iron sights truly aren't as good as those on an AR or a Garand (although they are better than the factory sights on the pre-580 series Ranch Rifles, IMO).
But if you take a solid position (NOT resting on the magazine or the barrel), focus hard on the front sight like you're supposed to, take your time like you're supposed to, squeeze the trigger like you're supposed to, and follow through like you're supposed to, an AK will shoot like a Winchester M1894, which it ballistically resembles. And sticking an optic on the built-in optics siderail (that's what it's there for!) makes the issue sights a non-issue anyway; the irons are just BUIS on my carbine.
Most of us won't be using full-auto, because most of us don't have $17,000+ to drop on a transferable pre-1986 NFA Title 2 restricted AK-47.OTOH, the AK is fun on full-auto even if you just light up dust clouds all around the target at 100 yards and nothing else. It will give him a heart attack and maybe kill him from that, unless he is a zombie, in which case, he will continue to advance until you put 1 in the head.
A civilian semiauto AK can make head shots on zombies at 100 yards, though...
Briansmithwins, what ammo were you using, and what was the muzzle device?Mine does a little better than 12MOA. Target was shot at 100 yards with iron sights. The grid is 1". The post-it was the aiming point but the rifle wasn't zeroed for the muzzle device that was on the rifle at the time, hence the change to POI. The rifle is an Arsenal SLR107FR. BSW
Small Arms Review had an article on AK accuracy in the December 2008 issue, and they found the slant brake increased group size by 50% or so, IIRC.
They did. The new-manufacture 580-series mini-14's are reported to be considerably more accurate than the older models. (My 5.5-MOA Ranch Rifle was a 1989-ish 188-series.)thought ruger re-tooled all threre machines to improve there accuracy?my new mini's barrel looks allot different than my old mini.
Last edited: