Flashpoint
Member
I've attached a pic that I've found interesting. I don't have a source for it. It's just something that I pulled from a post off of Glocktalk some time ago. If anyone knows where it came from please let us know.
The ballistics chart that the manufacture put on the rounds that I keep in my 40 reads 155-grain at about 1200 ft per sec. That's a little lighter and quit a bit fast than the the charts show they used.
I have one of each of the aforementioned calibers. I like the 9mm for it's capacity and cheap practice. I like my 1911 because it feel great, has an awesome trigger, carries well for it's size, and has a big fat bullet. I carry my 40 when I'm wanting to carry something small (my for 40 and 9mm are the same gun save for the barrel), with a fatter bullet than a 9mm.
Really I don't know if it's the gun or the caliber, but I didn't like shooting the G27, G22, or the Sigma 40, and the G23 I shot was OK. But I do like shooting my 40cal Steyr S as much as I do the 9mm.
All in all, I think these caliber wars are kind of silly
The ballistics chart that the manufacture put on the rounds that I keep in my 40 reads 155-grain at about 1200 ft per sec. That's a little lighter and quit a bit fast than the the charts show they used.
I have one of each of the aforementioned calibers. I like the 9mm for it's capacity and cheap practice. I like my 1911 because it feel great, has an awesome trigger, carries well for it's size, and has a big fat bullet. I carry my 40 when I'm wanting to carry something small (my for 40 and 9mm are the same gun save for the barrel), with a fatter bullet than a 9mm.
Really I don't know if it's the gun or the caliber, but I didn't like shooting the G27, G22, or the Sigma 40, and the G23 I shot was OK. But I do like shooting my 40cal Steyr S as much as I do the 9mm.
All in all, I think these caliber wars are kind of silly