Americans own nearly half the privately owned guns in the world

Status
Not open for further replies.
By number yes
by dollar value I'll bet we are over 80%
 
When the issue comes up I like to ask three questions:

How large are the combined armies of China and Pakistan?

How many guns have been sold since Obama was elected?

What were the British marching on Concord and Lexington to seize?

We can't lose if we stand together!
 
The utter hypocrisy of the antis never ceases. How many people die in auto deaths every year? Where is all the yellow journalism in outrage against automobiles? If they truly believe their tripe of "if it saves just one life", then get rid of the automobiles.

Then again...guns save multiple lives every year too...so "if it saves just one life" then you need to support private gun ownership.

Like I said in another thread, blaming violence on guns is like blaming the French Revolution on the guillotine.

Yellow Journalism and political scare tactics are about as bad for this nation as gun violence.
 
The utter hypocrisy of the antis never ceases. How many people die in auto deaths every year? Where is all the yellow journalism in outrage against automobiles? If they truly believe their tripe of "if it saves just one life", then get rid of the automobiles..
But the argument I hear against that is that cars have a use, whereas guns are designed to hurt and kill. To which I have no response to...someone help me out here!
 
This reminds me of the move "Lord of War", one of my favorite movies. So paraphrasing the movie's opening scene, "Americans own half of all privately owned firearms in the world. What will it take to own the other half?"
 
But the argument I hear against that is that cars have a use, whereas guns are designed to hurt and kill. To which I have no response to...someone help me out here!

I don't see what it matters, especially to those with the "if it saves one life" mentality. Guns hurt and kill in order to save lives by feeding people via hunting, save lives via self defense.

Guns are used in shooting sports...that is as use other than hurting and killing.
 
But the argument I hear against that is that cars have a use, whereas guns are designed to hurt and kill. To which I have no response to...someone help me out here!

Yes, they are, at least primarily. And sometimes that's a vitally necessary ability to have. The ability to defend with lethal force is an inalienable human right. Guns are the most effective means we have to enact that right.
 
So many people I speak to in my country have a serious aversion to killing. By that, I mean they would not kill, even if they would die as a result. I feel it's down to years and years of successive government legislation that have neutered the population's attitude to self preservation and taking responsibility for one's own safety.
 
So many people I speak to in my country have a serious aversion to killing. By that, I mean they would not kill, even if they would die as a result. I feel it's down to years and years of successive government legislation that have neutered the population's attitude to self preservation and taking responsibility for one's own safety.
I suppose studying mid-20th century history must be really ... odd... then, over in Great Britain.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackstone
But the argument I hear against that is that cars have a use, whereas guns are designed to hurt and kill. To which I have no response to...someone help me out here!

Firearms equalize and deter. They also provide a fourth check and balance, being the teeth of the first amendment.

1st amendment -- The right to know the actions of, and the right to be heard by those hired by us.
2nd amendment -- The leverage necessary to ensure these same employees listen carefully to the above.

Without it, they have absolute reign, and no longer work for us. Since they would prefer to rule rather than represent, they must remove this leverage.

We can never forget one glaring imbalance in these efforts of theirs. They themselves are extremely well armed, and will not be participating in these efforts to disarm those they seek to rule. They are far too important for that. They are well aware of a firearms equalizing effect; they seek desperately to have that balance of power tipped in their favor, being vastly outnumbered by the governed.
 
Last edited:
Yes, they are, at least primarily. And sometimes that's a vitally necessary ability to have. The ability to defend with lethal force is an inalienable human right. Guns are the most effective means we have to enact that right.

If I may be so bold as to offer a slight twist on this:

Guns are the most effective means the common man has ever had to enact that right.

Until the advent of firearms (small arms), the weaker were subject to the stronger and could not stand on equal footing in combat or self-defense. All other weapons, even the bow, were overwhelmingly more effective in the hands of a stronger adversary, whether wielded individually or by groups or governments.

Just a point to ponder, historically.

;)
 
Automobiles are an absolute necessity for most Americans whereas guns are not an absolute necessity for MOST Americans.
I own a lot of guns but don't absolutely have to have them as I don't feed my family with them(I hunt but more for enjoyment than food even though I do eat the animals). In my lifetime I have never had to use a firearm in SD or HD despite the fact that I carry every day and have them for HD as well. Necessity? Not for the vast majority of gun owners.
Are cars that can easily go 120 MPH a necessity? Are 4k pound SUVs a necessity? I own 4 automobiles all of which are specialized. A family "grocery go getter", a travel truck, a hunting truck and a fun in the sun SUV. That doesn't count the farm vehicles or RV. All 4 of these are easily capable of breaking the law in every city, county and state in the country just by my pushing the gas. They are all capable of killing purposefully and indiscriminately simply by swerving into oncoming traffic or maybe heading up a busy sidewalk.
None of this means that YOU have the right to tell me what kind of automobile I can have in America nor what kind of firearm I can have in America. There are certainly limits on what we can have as firearms owners as well as what we can have as car owners(despite the commercial where Dale Jr trades his car for a Dew). Without firearms in the hands of Americans we would have a vastly different culture. Less deaths(debatable I know but assuming NOBODY had access to a gun), less lead in the environment(sheesh), etc, etc. The same is true of automobiles for without them there would be FAR fewer accidental deaths, much cleaner air, much less asphalt, much more disposable income, etc, etc.
Without guns we could depend on the government to keep us safe from ALL enemies. Without private automobiles we could depend on the government to get us to work on time and to the grocery store etc. What could be wrong with that plan?
I intend to do my best to make sure Americans continue to own most of the world's guns.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top