No.
The mark ".222 Mag" means .222 Remington Magnum which is not the same as .222 Remington or .223 Remington. They are not interchangeable and since .222 Magnum is the longest, you can't even rechamber.
Factory ammo is going to be hard to find and expensive. Handloading is the way to go these days. I stocked up on brass many years ago, so I am OK for a while. I had not heard of using .204 brass. I'll have to remember that.
I have a heavy barrel Sako in .222 Mag and would not trade it for anything. I recently replaced the Redfield Golden 5 Star scope on it with a Vortex Viper.
yeah but they are beautiful! the .222 mag is a really good cartridge, too bad the military chose the .223 as the .222 mag would have gotten those 77 grain up bullets going much better.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.