Animal rights activists attack family with pro-hunting sticker on car

Status
Not open for further replies.

Preacherman

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
13,306
Location
Louisiana, USA
This happened in England, but who can doubt that it'll happen here, too, one day? :fire:

From the Daily Mail, UK ( http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=393881&in_page_id=1770 ):

Animal rights activists admit attack on grandmother

By COLIN FERNANDEZ, Daily Mail 20:49pm 3rd July 2006

Three animal rights activists launched a terrifying attack on a family, including a 75-year-old grandmother, for having a pro-hunting sticker on their car, a court heard yesterday.

Heather Nicholson, Natasha Avery and Daniel Wadham jumped out of their car while stuck in a traffic jam to spit, screamed abuse and banged on the windows of their victims.

At one stage they hit a 75-year-old grandmother and tried to open the car doors to drag her 21-year-old grandson into the street. It was only the intervention of outraged members of the public that halted the attack.

Avery and Nicholson, both 38, are founding members of the controversial group Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) which has instigated the hate campaign against companies involved in animal testing.

Together with Wadham, 19, they pleaded guilty to one charge of affray at Kingston Crown Court today.

Judge Nicholas Jones remanded Nicholson in custody and warned Avery and Wadham they could face jail when they are sentenced on July 21. The judge said: 'Custodial sentences appear to be merited in relation to these matters.'

The family who cannot be named for legal reasons to protect their safety were travelling in Richmond, south-west London during the attack on November 9 last year.

On the back of their Audi driven by the grandmother's daughter, Mrs A, in her mid-40s was a small sticker that said: 'Two working dogs, working people, work in hunting.'

The driver suddenly heard a bang on her window and a woman screaming: 'F+++ing scum, f+++ing perverts,' while Wadham was banging on the side of the car. One woman shouted: 'Get that sticker off your window.'

The 21-year-old shouted to his mother: 'Just drive,' to shake off the extremists. The traffic lights turned green and the family drove off but the extremists got back in their car to pursue.

Hate-filled rant

When both cars had to stop at the next set of traffic lights on the A316 the attack began again. Mrs A tried to lock all her doors, but was unable to, and Nicholson launched another hate-filled rant screaming: 'F+++ing perverts, f+++ing scum.'

Mrs A was 'in tears and shaking' as Avery shouted similar obscene abuse at the passenger window. Mrs Nicholson then reached in the passenger door to pull Mrs A's son out of the car by his legs - but he kicked to stop her.

When the 75-year-old put her left arm out to help her grandson Nicholson hit her arm and Nicholson and Wadham spat in the 21-year-old's face and on the passenger door.

Other motorists came to the rescue of the family with one driver shouting to the extremists: 'If you want to start, start on me,' before police arrived to arrest all three.

Jill Evans, defending Nicholson, said her client had committed 'a most unattractive offence' but it was not premeditated.

Nicholson currently in jail on remand was last year jailed for breaching an ASBO placed in January last year which banned her from 500 metres of Huntingdon Life Sciences laboratories in Cambridgeshire or Suffolk, although this breach was later overturned by the court of appeal. Both she and Avery have a long string of previous convictions mostly relating to public order offences and animal rights protests.

The court heard Wadham has no previous convictions.

The court ordered that the trio's exact addresses are not to be published for fear of reprisals.

SHAC, formed in 1999, claims not to condone violence although many of its activists have previous convictions for attacking employees of animal laboratories. With members in the UK, US, Germany and Italy, it has been linked to fire bomb attacks on lab workers.

It has been accused by the FBI of posting the names and addresses of scientists and investors in drug testing firms, who have subsequently been attacked by the terrorist group The Animal Liberation Front. Some observers describe SHAC's role as offering a public face to ALF's paramilitary style tactics.
 
Attacking a 75 year old woman calls for a good old fashioned caning. :fire:

Judicial caning, carried out with a long rattan rod and generally much more severe than the canings given in schools, was a feature of some colonial judicial systems, and in some cases still is post-independence, particularly in East Asia and some African countries. The practice is still retained in Malaysia and Brunei (but not Thailand and in Indonesia was only reintroduced in the special case of Aceh, on Sumatra, which since its 2005 autonomy has introduced a form of shariah, applying the cane to the clothed upper back with Muslim modesty). African countries still using judicial caning include Botswana, Tanzania, Nigeria, Uganda and (for juvenile offenders only) Swaziland and Zimbabwe. Until recent years it was also frequently applied in Kenya and South Africa. In Singapore, healthy male criminals under 50 years of age can be sentenced to a maximum of 24 strokes of the rotan (rattan) cane on the bare buttocks; the punishment is mandatory for over 40 offenses, mostly violent or sexual crimes, but also some immigration violations, drug violations, and acts of vandalism. It is also imposed for certain breaches of prison rules. Caning in Singapore is particularly severe and can leave permanent scars on the recipient. The punishment is also applied, regardless of controversy in and void interventions from the West, to foreigners, as under intense media attention in Singapore in 1994 to Michael P. Fay, an American student who had vandalised several automobiles, and in the UAE in 1996 to Sarah Balabagan, a Filipina maid convicted of homicide.
 
I think its a lot less likely to happen here, as long as the activists have some doubts about whether the potential victims might be armed. Hence the attacks on fur wearers, not hunters in pick-up trucks.
 
It's hard to respect their idea of animal rights when they totaly disregard "human" rights.

Elevating animal rights above "human" rights? Brilliant - not.:banghead:
 
On my car,I have a BASC sticker and a UK UKNRA sticker.Those anti-activist persons make me,want to puke and recently in London,I was stopped by an animal rights activist and asked to fill in a survey regarding animal cruelty.Before they guy asked me to participate, I said:"Sorry,Im not interested and I have to rush".He said:"You,don't know what I am about to say",and I replied:"No, I don't but Im not really intersted, in what people like you have to say anyway,but don't give up yet-why dont you try visting Holland and Holland and Purdeys-Im sure that they would love to help you out.:neener: :evil:

He called me an ******* and I said to him:"Iv'e got better things to do,whilst on leave then argue with a f**king prat,like you-if you don't leave me alone,I will go to the nearst cops and report you for harrassment-so bugger off".Hunting was around for many years and centuaries, well before both your time and my time."
 
I know this is a serious thing, and that they could have really hurt someone, but this made me laugh:
'If you want to start, start on me,'

I agree with salthouse. They are a little hesitant when they think someone can defend themselves. On the other hand, what would happen if it did happen here in the states and a firearm was used as defense.

My theory is that the mere presence of the gun would have brought the criminals to some of their senses, gotten back in their car, driven away from the area and we never hear about.
 
You'll note that the Animal Rights types are bodacious brave about throwing paint on little old ladies' fur coats, but you never see them going into a biker bar and griping about leather...

:D, Art
 
A friendly word of advice to "activist":
If you beat on 75 year old women to emphasize your anti violence message, the rest of the world will disregard whatever you say. And has already been pointed out, these pinheads do not seem as prevalent in a population that is allowed the tools to defend themselves.
 
Just goes to show that those who are against "cruel" things like hunting or owning firearms often do so because they understand that they aren't responsible enough psychologically to be trusted to engage in those activities.
 
And has already been pointed out, these pinheads do not seem as prevalent in a population that is allowed the tools to defend themselves.

They are about as common, but use different methods, including raiding animal testing facilities, spiking trees, destroying SUVs, and burning down buildings/homes they consider excessive or intrusive.

The American subspecies of the ecoterrorist has adapted to its environment by avoiding predators (i.e. those capable of eliminating said subspecies) and committing its terrorist activites in a clandestine way.
 
We have our share of nutcases here, to be sure. A couple of young women tried to "liberate" one of my friend's dogs from her crate in the back of the pickup where she was eating dinner. The school system churns more and more of them out each year.
 
"A couple of young women tried to "liberate" one of my friend's dogs"

With typical peta brilliance, they probably would have
"liberated" the dog to get run over in traffic.
 
Why is it the anti's attack hunters and hunters don't attack anti's?
Because they are the uncivilized ones.:mad:
 
Art Eatman said:
You'll note that the Animal Rights types are bodacious brave about throwing paint on little old ladies' fur coats, but you never see them going into a biker bar and griping about leather...

, Art
I'd love to see a PETA rally at Sturgis... Or in front of a HA clubhouse.
 
Yeah... with the NRA convention across the street so the EF!B's* get caught in a pincer...

[imagining]
EF!B swarm starts throwing paint on bikers' leathers.
HA's deliver mother of all beat-downs.
EF!B's flee toward NRA members, yelling "Save us!"
NRA: "Wait, didn't you all try to tell us that 'violence never solves anything' and we 'didn't need all those guns'? Besides, you started this problem, get yourselves out of it..."

*PM if you require an explanation, it's from a line delivered by the bald tyrannosaur-hunter in The Lost Wolrd: Jurassic Park. Yes, the floptacular second movie.
 
Once again another reason to belive peta finatics are more than a little messed up in the head. Just for hearing that story I'm going to go on a hog hunt tonight and dedicate it to all the peta freaks (calling them people would be unpolite to the human race at this point) in that attack. So here is to you.
 
I can't speak for all, but if my family were attacked like that, I am sure that my response would be different than that English bunch. I guess they are so beaten down there, that driving off against a red light was not an option?
 
i wonder if that could be considered a Hate Crime?

Not likely, unless the grandma was homosexual...:rolleyes:

If the PETA folks came to Texas to beat up any car or pick up with a hunting sticker on it, they'd be awefully busy. :rolleyes: Talk about being outnumbered! I've had DU stickers in the past and one bumper sticker with the old "They can have my guns when they pry my cold dead fingers from the barrel" which I doubt PETA would attempt to mess with me over. :evil:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top