Another failure on the war on drugs

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheeBadOne

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2002
Messages
2,217
Location
Nemo sine vitio est
http://www.msnbc.com/local/KGET/M297357.asp?0LA=aam9n

Elderly woman stabbed while asleep in her home
Bakersfield, CA, May 20
- A man is under arrest on charges he broke into a south Bakersfield home and stabbed an elderly woman while she slept.

It happened just before 4:30 Tuesday morning on Loch Lomond Drive.
The 79-year-old victim told detectives she was asleep in her bed when an intruder began stabbing her. The woman stumbled into another bedroom and alerted her husband, who grabbed his shotgun.
But by then the suspect had already taken off.
Deputies located the suspect's car parked outside the couple's home, with a bloody knife inside.
An hour and a half later they arrested 35-year-old Vanoy Sutton, who was walking near the intersection of Butler Street and Belle Terrace.
Sutton, who appeared to have dried blood on his hands and shoes, told authorities he had been smoking PCP and "may have broken into the home," but didn't remember.
The elderly victim was taken to a local hospital where she is listed in good condition.
-------------------------------------
If drugs were legalized these types of things wouldn't happen...:rolleyes:
 
How would legal PCP have prevented this guy from taking PCP and blacking out in a violent rampage? It doesnt appear that he went there to steal money to buy drugs or anything. In fact this is a great example of why drugs like PCP should never be legalized. This action wasnt a result of his desire to obtain an illegal drug. This outburst of violence is a direct result of TAKING that drug. Legal or not the result is the same.
 
But he can get the drug whether it's legal or not. We spend countless man hours, tax dollars and send scores of people to prison and it doesn't really do much.
 
The topic of drug legalization is certainly open for discussion, but I fail to see how this story and especially the underlined quote proves or add evidence to the idea that drugs should be legalized:confused: :confused: If this story does anything it certainly should cause one to ponder deeply the consequence of smoking PCP.
 
Another failure on the war on drugs

Yup.

Doors getting kicked in from coast to coast, police dogs sniffing trunks at random roadblocks, people having their property stolen by the cops (hey, the junkie may take your wallet, it's the government that takes your hundred acre ranch after they plant dope in the back forty to frame you), schoolkids peeing in cups, America looking more and more like a movie set from 1930's Germany...

All this going on, all this wilful shredding of the Bill of Rights, and grandma still gets stabbed in her bed.

It amazes me that anyone thinks more draconian enforcement is somehow the answer. (They've probably had a few too many beers if they do. ;) )
 
Theebad,

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If drugs were legalized these types of things wouldn't happen...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


would you like to elaborate on that?
I was being facetious! :D
 
In fact this is a great example of why drugs like PCP should never be legalized.


Perhaps you don't realize it, but PCP use is a result of the WOD. People couldn't get marijuana, cocaine, and opiates, so they started substituting animal traquilizers instead. Never mind that it doesn't seem too difficult to manufacture. Druggies still break into vet's offices to get things like ketamine (special K), etc.

Same thing w/ crack. Crack was a way to "stretch" supply. Who'd have thought it was more addictive?

Sounds like "unintended consequences," no?

All the WOD does is cause substitutions, many of which are worse than the drugs that were prohibited in the first place. Drug use is up, or was as of a few years ago. Kids can still get it. Anyone with a limited knowledge of economics and history can tell you why the WOD won't work.

Meanwhile, WOD is more of a war on our rights and buying muriatic acid and strike anywhere matches (very hard to find now) can get you flagged for LE attention. I feel soooooo free.
 
Boy is that a stretch
verystrange.gif
 
The problem is that the government CREATES whole new types of criminals with the stroke of a pen. Now, take a look at any antique store or museum that has pharmaceutical bottles from the late 1800s-early 1900s. You'll find things like "tincture of cannabis" was sold over the counter. Where was the mass social decay from this? Don't people refer to that era as "the good ole days"? Truth is, hysterions like Anslinger LIED to get marijuana made illegal. In the 1930s, he said it makes people turn into crazed murderers (and listen to jazz and dance with black people!) In the 1950s, he said it made people docile and susceptable to communist propaganda. Well, which was it A**linger? :rolleyes: Take a look at today. The government is whining about terrorists using bootlegged cigarettes to raise money. Well, WHO created the market in the first place? State govermments and their harrassingly high sales taxes on cigarettes. Well, you can try and "save the kids" from tobacco as an excuse to enact unConstitutional laws, but don't whine when people start buying off the black market to avoid them. Yep. Back in the "good ole days" of the 1800s, in most Western U.S. states and territories, gambling, prostitution, drugs, and free access to tobacco, firearms and alcohol was all legal. Where is the big threat to society from a weekly high-stakes poker game in someone's house? Where is the big threat from a couple people smoking a doobie in their own house? Where is the threat to society from tobacco not being taxed at like 500% mark-up? Where is the threat from a guy making his own popskull for his own consumption (you can make beer and wine, but distilling is a no-no except in certain cases.) Geeez, government and morality police, get a life! :rolleyes:
 
TheeBadOne,

Boy is that a stretch

You know what's interesting? One of the arguments against the end of Prohibition was "People will go blind from wood alcohol!", "Folks will die of alcohol poisoning from white lightning and bathtub gin!".

Instead, most people seemed happy to go back to beer & wine and the occasional mixed drink. If someone's risking jail time to get a buzz, they may as well get a good one. (Hint: Why are greater instances of EastBloc SMG's turning up with British gangs?)
 
Funny thing about Prohibition was that alcohol was being bootlegged in from Canada and the Carribean as a legal product purchased in those locales. It was legal at purchase, but illegal to import. The Coast Guard spent lots of time and money trying to intercept the boats bringing it in (and unknowingly spawning the beginings of the modern souped-up speed boats.) Some of the distributors on the U.S. end became legitimate businesses after the end of Prohibition.

Point being, who is the government to say, "Tut-tut! That's unhealthy and we will incarcerate you to prevent you from using it, even if there is not solid, factual evidence to support the allegations. The things already legal we will tax and tax until you break the law to get the product on the black market. Then that gives us the excuse to step up federal and state level Kevlar Kop police tactics." Further, "crimes" of altering one's consciousness are de facto "thought crimes". You used a plant to alter your state of mind and, ergo, broke the law against having a mind in a certain state. A thought crime. The DEA IS the Thought Police. This is not what we're supposed to be about in America. If someone under the influence of a controlled substance commits a crime, you punish THAT person. You don't punish EVERYONE who would use controlled substances responsibly if they were legal. It basically makes the whole of the United States in army basic training where the entire company gets punished harshly for the infraction of one soldier. I donn't think that blanket punishment is what we're supposed to be about in America.
 
Remember what killed George Washington? He had a respiratory infection, maybe pneumonia, and his doctors, with the best of intentions and best medical knowledge of the day...bled him to death.

I used to think that all the drug warriors were cynical JBT's, but have come to realise that many are sincere about wanting to fix the problem. They have seen the incredible ugliness that goes with drug use at its worst, and they want to stop it. Unfortunately, the standard cure is far worse than the disease.
 
This is quite a subject, there are so many different directions that the drug war takes you need a compass. As far as i am concerned anyone that says the drug war is winnable is either highly delusional or is somehow making a ton of money of of it. They cannot keep drugs out of PRISONS. People should not go to jail for possesing drugs, but it is not unusual to read in the paper people going to jail for drugs while sex offenders, thieves get probation. I am talking about NON-VIOLENT offenders, if you steal to get drugs you should go to jail for being a thief, if you become violent after using any substance drugs or alchol then bust them for assault. There should be no defense based on being under the influence made me do it. Most people that do drugs bother no one, the only difference between them smoking a joint in the evening or drinking a beer is the joint is illegal. Actually, I always thought the liberals would end theWOD's but they haven't I think they need the violence created by the black market in drugs to help justify their more importaint adjenda, the WAR ON GUNS. They don't mention the details but a lot of the antis numbers come from street gang violence over selling drugs. You have to set priorities and if the antis can keep people scared over gun violence by the deaths of gang members and innocents in the way it is worth it if they can eventually ban guns which is their more importaint task anyway. Thanks for listening, Jim.
 
That is a stretch

Actually, I'll agree w/ you.

These folks COULD get marijuana, cocaine, and opiates, considering how ineffective the WOD is/was.

PCP use is a matter of PRICE substitution. Stuff that has to be grown and imported from overseas is a good bit more expensive than something you can steal from the local vet or whip up in your kitchen.
 
many are sincere about wanting to fix the problem.


I'm sure that Osama, the homicide bombers, et al. are sincere too. Completely and utterly wrong, but sincere.

Sincerity is no substitute for logic and reason.

the standard cure is far worse than the disease.

Yep.
 
That is a stretch

I don't believe it's a stretch at all. People are going to expiriment with drugs legal or illegal. The harder it is to get pot or some of the others, the more they turn to animal tranqulizers, paint, glue, bannana peels, huffing regular household chemicals, ect.

So basically you have pot on one hand that has never directly caused even 1 human death, vs all these dangerous chemicals that kids/people substitute. Most of our modern stronger drugs come directly from prohibition.

There is a reason cocaine is around, when coca leaf tea was banned. Coca leaf tea was comparable to reglar coffee or tea, but when it was banned nobody wanted to get caught or have to haul around big bags of leaves. So they extracted the active ingrediant and now we have a much more dangerous and easier to smuggle chemical.
 
Thee Bad One, I'd love to hear your explanation as to why drug addicts decided to begin stealing and taking animal tranquilizers when such things had been almost unheard-of before the government set out to deny people the more conventional drugs. Far from being a stretch, that's the accepted reasoning on both sides of the "drug war debate." I've heard exactly the same explanation from hard-core drug warriors--only they were explaining how it was an indication of "success" in the war on some drugs that people felt the need to resort to other drugs.

Does anyone else remember a novel called Hammerheads? It was a fantasy by one of the big military novel names--Clancy, Brown, somebody--about a new unit that would use V-22 Ospreys and operate from oil platforms in the gulf of mexico to stop drug smuggling. They were wildly successful, but there were political problems plus, of course, a psychotic ex-Cuban air general who formed a fanatical smuggler air force called the "Cuchillos" complete with fighter jets to do battle with the Drug Warriors.

Even at the time, when I was still firmly in favor of wars on nouns, I was unnerved by the author's logic of "success." His characters were ecstatic not because use or addiction was down, but because they had raised the street price of cocaine and marijuana. That was it--just made it more expensive. It was assumed that from there the drug problem was sure to begin to lessen. Huh?:scrutiny:
 
They were wildly successful, but there were political problems plus, of course, a psychotic ex-Cuban air general who formed a fanatical smuggler air force called the "Cuchillos" complete with fighter jets to do battle with the Drug Warriors.

You know that the Cali cartel was trying to get a Russian sub armed w/ cruise missles? The DEA foiled it on the buyer's end, but merely by luck and some surveillance on the right guy.

It was assumed that from there the drug problem was sure to begin to lessen. Huh?

Cocaine has already been fabulously expensive, being over $1000/gram on the street during the '70s, when the Columbians switched from marijuana to cocaine and its use became popular. PCP pretty much came into its own during this period. Wonder why? :rolleyes:

No logic or reason need apply to be a drug cop. :scrutiny:
 
(Galahad) The problem is that the government CREATES whole new types of criminals with the stroke of a pen...etc.

What he said.

All drugs should be sold over-the-counter.

MR
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top