Another "gun writer" plants head firmly...

Status
Not open for further replies.

F4GIB

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Messages
1,165
Location
Midwest
Another "outdoors writer" offers his afterthoughts about the Zumbo affair and the response to his earlier column on the subject. "I'm sure Ill get a few more you’re-being-naive emails insisting that there's a plot by the Brady Bunch to take my old 870 away, but I don't believe this is close to reality." (Pump shotguns, such as the Remington 870, were just BANNED in Cook County IL and there is a bill to extend such a ban to the entire state of Illinois.)

The Fudd. So ignorant. So naive. So arrogant. So dangerous to us all.

http://www.newwest.net/index.php/topic/article/the_zumbo_affair_afterthoughts/C41/L41/
 
Biill Schneider? Never heard of him. Having him against us is sort of like having Lichtenstein declare war on the USA.
 
Zumbo destroyed himself

Here is what these writers have missed: Zumbo destroyed himself. He makes his living on the belief of his editors that people will want to read what he has written and view his video. If he destroys his credibility through his writing, and the people who are his target audience say “Hey! This guy doesn’t represent us, and we don’t believe a word he says”, then he has no one to blame but himself. Zumbo didn’t misspeak. He, through numerous postings, illustrated his belief that the second amendment was limited to hunting rifles, and that he believed that the black rifle crowd was detrimental to their cause. He has since (apparently) changed his opinion and I think we should support him for that.

With respect to the OP, labeling folks as “Fudds” is not helpful. Your last point is! When hunters understand the ultimate goal is total disarmament, they will come around. Let's help educate these people and pull them onto our side.
 
With respect to the OP, labeling folks as “Fudds” is not helpful.

I don't agree. But, ... I'm limiting it to so-called "gun writers" who proclaim themselves suitable to "lead" us to green pastures.

These guys will only learn when their income is reduced.
 
Bill Schneider appears to be about as naive as they come. Among many points made in his piece that I found distasteful, I took the NRA-bashing as a personal affront. If this Fudd actually believes that the antis lack the political capital (or the will) to severely cripple 2A rights, he's living in some parallel universe that I don't recognize. Scary folks, these Fudds.
 
I was once told by an anti-gun activist that "I won't be happy until every one of you gun freaks is shot dead and the gutters run with your blood."

She didn't say anything about exempting "sportsmen."

Jim
 
I don't think there would have been much of a fuss over Zumbo if he had simply said, "I don't like assault rifles, and don't think that they are very well suited for hunting." That would simply have been his oppinion, and while some people would dissagree, there wouldn't have been as much fuss. However, by calling them "terrorist rifles", not only did Zumbo insult a large group of gun owners, but denied the reason that the 2A exists (which has noting to do with hunting).
 
I disagree with those who believe we should embrace these people and help them to "see the light" ...

These idiots should be discarded. The gun community needs a good katharsis of all the anti-gun traitors, haters and saboteurs.

I'm sorry, but you can't go from "the AR is a terrorist weapon" in your line of thinking to "oops, I just made a mistake - I love EBR's!"

That's like being a Jew all your life and then one day saying "oops, I made a mistake" and in 24 hours you're a die hard believing Catholic. Sorry, just doesn't work that way.

These beliefs and ideas are formulated over a long time and have various basis in experience, thought, reasoning and judgment. Again, you don't go from being a capitalist to a communist in 2 days, you don't go from being a liberal to a conservative in 2 days, you don't go from being an AR-15 hater to an AR-15 lover in 2 days.


Now, this fellow talking about the 870 isn't as bad as Zumbo. He's part of the denial crowd who thinks their lousy hunting firearms are safe from the gun-hating extremists who will never stop until every firearm, including toys, BB guns, and even swords are banned (like in other countries). These people can be made to understand that nothing is safe from confiscation or bans - by using EXISTING examples of that. One of which was already listed in this thread.


Now, if these hunter types still don't give a damn about bans on semi-autos or EBR's because they are convinced that their firearms are safe in spite of the facts - then they are a bunch of self-serving, selfish, narrow-minded bigots. They are part of the problem, not part of the solution. They are an obstacle to freedom an they are just as bad as the anti-gunners since their rhetoric is like pure poison in that it undermines our efforts. You'd be surprised what this "testimonial" effect has on middle of the road people on this issue. When someone sees a hunter say "I don't care if you ban that AR, they're not for hunting" they've done more damage than any anti-gunner on the news or TV spreading their lies. I've seen this effect with my own eyes. It is damaging.


Some people believe that we shouldn't alienate them because then, to spite, they may work against us more. How can you get any worse than condemning 50% of the firearms in this country at a national level?


The trashing of Zumbo was very appropriate, and he should have got much worse. This sends a message to the other bigots who harbor anti-blackrifle feelings to keep it to themselves and to shut up, or they'll be wiped out of the industry.


Our community doesn't need anymore anti-blackrifle confessionals from a bunch of people who believe the founding fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment so they can duck hunt.
 
RTFM, please tell us you are joking :uhoh:

First, Jim is way too smart to give into violent reactions to somebody else proclaiming her jerkhoodiness. Second, a slap during an argument has a strong tendency to cancel any and all progress made on our side of the argument.

Joking, right?

Bart Noir
 
Why do you think this guy is a gun writer? What has he written about guns?
 
"I’m sure I’ll get a few more you’re-being-naive emails insisting that there’s a plot by the Brady Bunch to take my old 870 away, but I don’t believe this is close to reality. I’m sure there are people, another fanatic minority, who believe all guns should be banned, but I personally am not worried about it because they have no chance of success"
...


Bill, et. al.

You BETTER WAKE UP SOON! Those nice 870s are based on a Law Enforcement arm, and as such may be subject to the HR1022 ban which now has 12 sponsors in the Senate:

`(L) A semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General. In making the determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.'.

You do know what shotgun the FBI uses right? McNeil used one against Platt and Matix? Remington 870 shotgun...
 
You BETTER WAKE UP SOON! Those nice 870s are based on a Law Enforcement arm, and as such may be subject to the HR1022 ban which now has 12 sponsors in the Senate:

I think you mean House.

David
 
These beliefs and ideas are formulated over a long time and have various basis in experience, thought, reasoning and judgment. Again, you don't go from being a capitalist to a communist in 2 days, you don't go from being a liberal to a conservative in 2 days, you don't go from being an AR-15 hater to an AR-15 lover in 2 days.

DTOM,
I hear ya. But the journey of a thousand miles begins with one small step. I think it is a mistake to throw all hunters who are not absolutists under the bus at square one. Take some time to talk them through it. It may take some time to sink in. Lots of hunters aren't gun folks. They are hunters, who happen to use guns in their sport.

The trashing of Zumbo was very appropriate, and he should have got much worse. This sends a message to the other bigots who harbor anti-blackrifle feelings to keep it to themselves and to shut up, or they'll be wiped out of the industry.

I absolutely agree. They don't represent the values of the people they claim to. Zumbo is trying to right his wrong. It will take him a long, long time to do so, as well it should.
 
Biill Schneider? Never heard of him. Having him against us is sort of like having Lichtenstein declare war on the USA.

+1, never heard of the guy. His commentary, like one hand clapping, make little noise.

jm
 
Don't Tread On Me

DTOM - You know whenever I read about Zumbo changing his mind I wonder if he really believes that or wants his job back and is just saying what he knows he has to in order to get his job back.

I mean if he was so sure of his beief before how can it change so easily?

Is he just a blowhard and his first belief didn't mean much? Then what about his statements now?

Trust takes longer to re-build then going shooting with Ted Nugent and smiling.
 
disagree with those who believe we should embrace these people and help them to "see the light" ...

These idiots should be discarded. The gun community needs a good katharsis of all the anti-gun traitors, haters and saboteurs.

I agree fully. There also needs to be a distinction made between "gun owner" and "hunter". The two are not mutually inclusive. One can own guns and not hunt (like me) and one can also hunt and not own guns (like bow hunters). Frankly, I've always steered myself clear of hunting culture and don't see why I have to embrace something that I have no real desire to be a part of. I'm not saying that I reject hunters and want to see their sport squashed. It's fine that people hunt, I just don't see the defense of their SPORT as being one in the same as defense of the second amendment.

Why must guns be "sporty". Like Century AK "sporters". Who the HELL are these people kidding? I don't want a SPORTY gun. I don't want to look SPORTY. I don't own AKs for SPORT, I own them for personal defence. I shoot them for fun on occasion, but again, I don't defend my basis for their ownership on them being FUN. In my head, when I'm shooting targets, I always say, "I may need to do this for real one day". And yes, that means shooting an actual person/people. Oops, I said it. It'd be horrifc, I'd probably throw up and cry after I shot someone in defense, but that's why we own guns. Not so I can put on mossy oak and run around the woods smothering myself in deer piss hunting for Bambi's mom.
 
I'm wouldn't bet against Zumbo having an actual change of mind - a couple of days with the Motor City Mad Man expaining the nuances of the matter might not be like curling up with a copy of the "Second Amendment Primer".

Besides, he was old enough to retire and I'd give odds he wasn't living paycheck-to-paycheck either. If it was simply a matter of wanting money, I'd further bet that he could have gotten all he wanted from Sarah, Tom, Soros and the Pew Foundation.

Might just have been princilple.
 
You BETTER WAKE UP SOON! Those nice 870s are based on a Law Enforcement arm


Bwahahahahahahahahaha! thats funny. The 870 was designed as a sporting arm, Law Enforcment borrowed it.
 
Read the bill - the 870 is a "firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency", and so might meet HER (the bill's) definition of an assault weapon.

NOT funny at all really. I like my military/LE based guns - M1s, M1As, 92FS, et. al!


only1 - thanks for the correction! (HR... - what was I thinking???)
 
Read the bill - the 870 is a "firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency", and so might meet HER (the bill's) definition of an assault weapon.

In the current incarnation it would have to be semi-automatic to classify as an "assault weapon."
 
WE think it is obvious, but read it - it can be read to mean many things. I mean I know its a stretch, but just look at how they change "the right of the people to keep.." The opening terms in the definition SHOULD make it clear, I know.

`(30) The term `semiautomatic assault weapon' means any of the following:

`(L) A semiautomatic rifle**or shotgun**originally designed for military or law enforcement use,***or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm {refers to "semi rifle" or "military design"?}, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General. In making the determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.'.
 
I guess I am not one of "Most hunters....."

"Most hunters don’t want to be seen hunting with the same weapons SWAT teams or Marine snipers use." If someone wants to give me an M40 I'd take that baby out in the woods!
 
I agree fully. There also needs to be a distinction made between "gun owner" and "hunter". The two are not mutually inclusive. One can own guns and not hunt (like me) and one can also hunt and not own guns (like bow hunters).

And one can bow hunt (or use any other tool) and own EBR's...which is more likely the case these days. Knocking hunters over the Zumbo business is about as fair as knocking Republicans because the beloved "W" promised to sign the assault weapons bill if it crossed his desk...although I'm told he wuz jus foolin ya'll.
 
Knocking hunters over the Zumbo business is about as fair as knocking Republicans because the beloved "W" promised to sign the assault weapons bill if it crossed his desk...although I'm told he wuz jus foolin ya'll.

I'm not saying that hunters are bad people. Hell, I love ivory and would be glad to see more of it, I'm just saying that "hunter" and "gun owner" are not mutually inclusive. If you own EBRs and bow hunt, you'd be a gun owner who also hunts. Similarly, if you owned EBRs and golfed on the weekend, you'd be a gun owner who happens to golf.

I mean in theory, one can be vegetarian and a gun owner, one cannot be vegetarian and a hunter (unless you use your AR-15 to pick oranges...).

It's like car ownership. One can own an SUV, but that doesn't mean one uses it to go off-road. But an offroader may choose to use an SUV or a mountain bike. Either way, you don't damn a person who chooses to drive an H-1 Alpha to the grocery store, it's their right to drive whatever they feel most comfortable in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top