As to it being an "urban legend" or such until proven ....
Some will never believe that our enemies will stoop to such tactics. If offered examples, they will claim the examples are hearsay unless they happened to the person telling them. If they did happen to that person, they will insist on names, dates and locations. If the person provides names, dates and locations, they will then question why it wasn't reported in the news or ask for documentation (police reports / cout cases).
Having some amount of skeptisism is healthy. It prevents a person from falling for every con artist that opens thier mouth.
Having too much is the same as burying your head in the sand.
Some will never believe that our enemies will stoop to such tactics. If offered examples, they will claim the examples are hearsay unless they happened to the person telling them. If they did happen to that person, they will insist on names, dates and locations. If the person provides names, dates and locations, they will then question why it wasn't reported in the news or ask for documentation (police reports / cout cases).
Having some amount of skeptisism is healthy. It prevents a person from falling for every con artist that opens thier mouth.
Having too much is the same as burying your head in the sand.