Owners that aren't satisfied with the product are MUCH more apt to post on the various fora about their issues.
If yours is a lemon, so be it, and post to that effect. Do Not Condemn the guns that aren't.
I agree, people with problems are probably more apt to post, and they also have a right to post that they did have troubles, as they did. They dont fall into the "I heard" groups, who seem to have an agenda all their own, for whatever reason.
Then again, you have the people who have them, who seem to get annoyed if someone has a different experience with "their" favorite gun, and feels the need to attack them like its their fault they had troubles, and not the guns.
When someone asks if any one had problems, they asked the question. Dont get mad, if someone answers with an opposing view, especially if they had trouble, hey, it happens. Their answer is by no means void because you didnt and dont agree.
Even down the road if they get it fixed, just becasue it was fixed, doesnt mean now that all the previous aggravation and problems never existed. It also doesnt mean the problem was necessarily corrected. There have been a number of people who have sent them back multiple times with no luck. Its bad enough it went back once, and as far as Im concerned, thats all any of them get, is one chance to fix it. Beyond that, if its kept, its a toy, and nothing more.
Hey, Im by no means a SIG basher either, far from it. Ive got a Mosquito and a P250, and neither have ever been a problem, although Im constantly told they should be. Unfortunately for me, SIG number 18, the P238, was my first "lemon". I always had good luck with SIG, and was never a "old school snob", and had old and new guns and liked them all. Ive also said I'd be the first to say there was a problem "if" there was one, and I didnt hesitate to say my P238 was a problem. Why, because it was. No agenda at all, just questions asked and answered, even if you dont like the answer.