Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Anyone not like heavy barrels?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Monkeybear, Mar 10, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Monkeybear

    Monkeybear Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,178
    So I am getting alot more into rifles lately. One thing that keeps popping up is heavy barrels. Every gun store clerk and fellow shopper can't help but tell me how heavy a barrel they have on their gun at home or how such and such rifle has a nice big heavy barrel.

    Am I the only one who wants a barrel as thin and light as possible? Maybe its because when I shoot my rifles I don't use bags or bi-pods and my arms get tired, or maybe I just like all of my guns to be 'handy'. I don't know why but I just don't have any love for HBs.

    What do you guys think about HBs? Like them? Love them? Indifferent?
     
  2. eliphalet

    eliphalet Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,682
    Location:
    Idaho
    None of my guns are bench rest or stationary varmint guns. All are for hunting or plinking, or some targets shooting, none have heavy barrels. If I did much of that type of shooting it would be a different story. Nothing against them just not for my type of use. Several of my sporters will do MOA or better, which again is good enough for what they are used for without the unneeded extra weight.
    If I was into serious target or long range sooting I would want heaver than I own. Different tools for different applications
     
  3. CZguy

    CZguy Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,975
    Location:
    Missouri
    Says it all. :)
     
  4. elmerfudd

    elmerfudd Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Messages:
    1,463
    Thin light barrels are good for firing a single shot or for cartridges like the .22LR that don't produce a lot of heat. Heavy barrels are better for sustained fire and are easier to hold steady from a bench or bipod. The heavy barrel is more ridged and takes longer to heat up.

    It all depends on what you want the rifle for. For accurate target shooting, the heavy barrel gives you a serious advantage. For hunting, the thin barrel is easier to pack around. Trying to target shoot with a barrel that opens up when it heats up is a PITA. You fire a shot and then hang around for 5-10 minutes while the barrel cools down, then fire another shot, etc... Two hours later you might have gone through a box of ammo.

    I've got both types, but I tend to prefer barrels a little on the heavy side.
     
  5. .22guy

    .22guy Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2007
    Messages:
    10
    You have to look at the advantages and disadvantages to both. Personally, I have many of both. I prefer heavy for bench or shooting off the hood of my truck, but I don't like lugging a 12.5 lb rifle around much.
     
  6. jpwilly

    jpwilly Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,892
    Location:
    Phoenix AZ
    I have one heavy bbl rifle an AR Varmint / Target Rifle. Makes it real sweet for that role but wouldn't want to hump it around for long!
     
  7. dmazur

    dmazur Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,263
    Location:
    Pacific NW
    I have a heavy barrel .30-06 (like you say, if you don't have to carry it far), and a lighter barrel .30-06.

    The heavy barrel weighs 13.5 lbs w/scope and the "light" one weighs 9 lbs w/scope.

    I still don't have anything that could be called "featherweight", but the 9 lb one isn't all that bad. At least, as long as I don't try high altitude sheep hunting...
     
  8. Wetawd

    Wetawd Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    117
    Location:
    Wahington. Maple Valley, Renton
    U guys all keep saying "heavy barrels" isn't that the same as a bull barrel or just a little different?

    They're much better for long range though and very fun.
     
  9. Regolith

    Regolith Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,365
    Location:
    Nevada & Oregon
    Not so fun when you got to haul them up and down mountain sides, though. ;)

    My primary use for rifles is for hunting, so I don't want a heavy barrel on them. However, I don't like having too thin of a barrel, either. Any extra weight shaved off the barrel to make it thinner could be shaved off my midsection, as well, and it would probably be cheaper and not negatively effect accuracy. :neener:
     
  10. chris in va

    chris in va Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Messages:
    6,095
    Location:
    Louisville KY
    A handgun, I know...but I had a Ruger 22/45 with the 5.5" stainless 'bull' barrel. Honestly it just took the fun out of shooting 22. Way too top heavy.
     
  11. YodaVader

    YodaVader Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    940
    Location:
    Indiana
    That is all I have in centerfire rifles is some type of heavy barrel rifle. One is a 20" barrel and is not that much heavier than some longer barrel sporters. I don't carry my rifle around all day. Depends on what you are doing. My use is target shooting. If I did carry a hunting rifle I too would include some type of sporter rifle as well.

    With 22lr I have sporter barrel rifles and a few aftermarket heavy barrels.
     
  12. Slamfire

    Slamfire Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,528
    Location:
    Alabama
    It is my considered opinion that the "heavy barrel" trend is a new one.

    I have a JC Higgins M50, built right after WWII. It is a very light bolt action rifle, in 30-06. Kicks too. In all respects it is built lighter than today's bolt action rifles. This got me pondering.

    I asked one of our Grey beards, a guy who has an outstanding collection of rifles, all periods. I asked him, "are older rifles lighter than today's rifles?", and in the main, they are.

    Of course ignoring blackpowder era stuff, but once you get to smokeless, and post WWI, rifles were built light. Lighter stocks, thinner barrels, a lot of weight reduction.

    I believe this is due to the fact that in today's society you drive everywhere. Folks don't walk, they don't carry stuff. That was not true that long ago, four wheeler's and a lack of four wheel drive vehicles meant you parked your car on the side of the road and walked in. People were thinner back then too, you never say so many obese people even in the 70's.

    Anyway as our butts have gotten bigger, so have the barrels!!! :D
     
  13. H2O MAN

    H2O MAN member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,438
    Location:
    USA
    All but one of my M14s have standard profile barrels, the lone exception is a medium heavy barrel.
     
  14. Onmilo

    Onmilo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    9,773
    Location:
    Illinois`
    You don't mention where you hail from, but if your hunting grounds offer lots of up and down hill or mountain hiking, I for one can fully appreciate your taste for a light barrel rifle.

    The problem with most light barrel guns is that they do not do well as target rifles.
    For hunting they are usually more than sufficiently accurate.
    For putting five shots into one hole at 300 meters, they don't do so hot.
     
  15. Vern Humphrey

    Vern Humphrey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    18,389
    Location:
    Deep in the Ozarks
    I'm more of a hunter than a target shooter. Carrying a heavy barrel all day at 11,000 feet in the Rockies will make you wish for a much lighter rifle, I guarentee.
     
  16. Coronach

    Coronach Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,109
    As was said, it all depends on the use. The only rifles I have where barrel weight is an option (lots o milsurps) are my ARs, and none of them run heavy barrels. Now, if I had an AR set up for varmit hunting or precision target shooting, I probably would have a heavy barrel. But all of my ARs are combat-style carbines, so they wear (at heaviest) a M4-profile barrel.

    Mike
     
  17. RockyMtnTactical

    RockyMtnTactical Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,539
    Depends on the purpose of the gun. For an AR15, or any other type of defensive combat weapon, I generally hate them.

    They are only useful in a machine gun, sniper, or target rifle.
     
  18. Sergeant Sabre

    Sergeant Sabre Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,202
    Location:
    Michigan
    Since I hunt more than I target shoot, I don't like heavy barrels.
     
  19. 30Cal

    30Cal Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,282
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    I only have them on competition rifles.
     
  20. Markbo

    Markbo member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2007
    Messages:
    900
    Location:
    Texas
  21. Clipper

    Clipper Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,243
    Location:
    Mt. Morris, MI.
    With the exception of target or varmint guns, I like 'em as short and light as I can get. My dream hunting rifle is a ULA M-20 in .257 Roberts with a 16 1/2" barrel and peep sights. I'd like it to weigh no more than 5 pounds with a sling and full magazine...
     
  22. Seafarer12

    Seafarer12 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Messages:
    1,028
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    But heavy barreled sniper rifles are tacticool.

    Myself I would have one on a target rifle but anything I had to carry around I wouldnt want one. Most of my guns have a light conture barrel.
     
  23. Savage Shooter

    Savage Shooter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    681
    Location:
    Plymouth,Illinois
    I have a savage 12fv .223 with 26" barrel a BSA 6-24-44 mil dot scope all together it weighs 10lbs its a heavy S.O.B. if you have to pack it. Bought it for coyote hunting originaly not knowing how heavy it acctualy was and now can't hunt with it cause its to friggin heavy. Love the gun to death great shooter but its now my ride on the 4-wheeler with me gun. If I see some thing i don't have to pack it anywhere I can just shoot at it. NOT ACTUALLY ON THE 4-WHEELER, OFF IT ON A REST. Its great for that but not much else if had to do it over again i'd buy a smaller barrel.:cool:
     
  24. moooose102

    moooose102 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2007
    Messages:
    3,024
    Location:
    West Michigan
    IMO,a heavy barrel is fine for range use, but if you are going to have to carry that thing out in the woods all day, the gun should be as light as possible (personal experience and preferance) and still not break your nose to shoot it. unfortunatly, my uncle went to an extreeme lightening a rifle so much that it gave him a nose bleed whenever he shot it. i dont remember what it was, but he lightened everything as much as he could, then ended up pouring lead into some of the holes just so he could shoot it. i think it was before we knew about muzzlebrakes, or i am sure he would have done that (more holes!). i would love to be able to take 1&1/2 pounds off my remington 700, but i do not know how without ruining it.
     
  25. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    Balance is the forgotten key to rifle making. Heavy barrels usually throw that off.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page