Anyone think this Dog Attack Insurance sounds familiar....

Status
Not open for further replies.

sar

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2003
Messages
95
Location
NYC
http://www.nypost.com/seven/04182004/news/regionalnews/22862.htm

April 18, 2004 -- ALBANY - Dog owners beware: The police may soon be out for your pooches.
State legislators want to force owners to buy liability insurance for their dogs - and have cops fine any owner whose pup doesn't have an insurance tag on.

If the owner does not get insurance, the dog will be impounded and possibly euthanized.

This latest proposal adds to the attack on the city's dog owners, who already must register their pets and keep them leashed.

The measure, called "Elijah's Law" after 3-year-old Elijah Torres of The Bronx, who was savagely mauled by a Rottweiler last fall, is aimed at certain breeds with histories of attacking people.

But it applies to all dogs - although the cost of the "attack insurance" would depend on the breed of dog.

"We are determined to hold the owners of these vicious dogs accountable for what their animals do," said Bronx Democratic Assemblyman Peter Rivera, who sponsored the bill.



"And given that dog bites have increased 37 percent in the last 10 years, holding all dog owners responsible for the behavior of their animals makes sense," he told The Post.

Rivera said city dog owners would have to shell out between $75 and $150 a year for the policies, which provide coverage of up to $10,000 in bite-related medical costs.

Under the proposal, dogs would have to be insured before sale or adoption, and owners would be required to put orange tags on their pets to indicate they were insured.

Anyone caught walking a dog without the bright orange tag on would be subject to a $100 fine on the first offense and $150 for each offense after that.

Canines found to be uninsured would be impounded. Owners would have 10 days to buy the insurance, and would be charged a $15 a day impoundment fee until they did so.

After two weeks in the pound, authorities would have the option of euthanizing an uninsured pet or putting it up for adoption.

The bill, co-sponsored by Bronx Democratic Assemblyman Ruben Diaz, would also allow municipalities to force owners to muzzle dogs deemed dangerous.

The number of reported dog attacks in the Big Apple and across the country has skyrocketed in recent years.

Nationally, nearly 4.5 million bites occur each year, costing victims $100 million in medical expenses.
 
So you sue the pants off the moron with the Rottweiler & put the dog down. Politicians, man I'm thinking their only good for moving targets downrange...Assuming you can get their fat A$$ out of there lazy boy
 
It will be a tiny little jump to try and apply this to guns...
 
reminds, me, I forgot to reup on my killer robot insurance. God thing sam waterston reminded me to buy more.
"because remember, once it grabs you with its steel claws, there's no escaping them...because their made of steel.

PM me if you have a link to that video.

ate3k
 
Nationally, nearly 4.5 million bites occur each year, costing victims $100 million in medical expenses.

So the average medical cost is $22?

It sounds like apparent increase in "dog attacks" is due to an increase in reporting of insignificant nips by a dog.

Dog attacks are a serious issue, but the statistics in this sound pretty ridiculas. I think there's about 280 million people in the US, so apparently every year 1 in 62 people get attacked by a dog.

I'm not real sympathetic about aggressive dogs. I was bitten twice as a child and still am nervous around aggressive dogs.

However, this really just looks like another way to make lawyers rich. Instead of just having $100 millions in medical expenses we'll have billions in legal expenses as well, because juries seem to be happy to award the limit of your insurance coverage to anyone who might have been scared and suffered "emotional dammage".

How long before those awful neighbors with the kids that are always causing problems sue you because your dog nipped at them to chase them off your property?
 
how bout in a public place or on your own property a dog attacks you, you shoot it to death. Problem solved.

atek3
 
So the average medical cost is $22?
Well, I don't know about their math, but my wife was bitten by a dog about three weeks ago and I can tell you the medical costs will far exceed $22. And it was really a pretty minor single bite to the calf requiring only two stitches.

Rick
 
I don't know about in that town, by my homeowners insurance covers me if my dogs were to attack anyone. Last thing I would need is a $300/year "insurance" expense that would only cover me up to $10K per dog.

I have two dogs that are 3/4 German Shepherd, 1/4 Chow. In some cities they would be automatically killed at the pound if picked up becuase of their breed mixture. In reality, unless the dogs felt legitimatly threatened on their territory, the worst they'd ever do is lick you to death.

Now my insurance agent did say that they would only pay out one time, ever, in the case of my dogs attacking someone. Of course, if they did that, and it was for any reason save to protect me and mine from real harm, they would be put down, by me, immediatly. So there would never be a need to worry about subsequent events.
 
Yeah well that makes you a responsible pet owner. I don't hunt so the only reason I own my sks is to whack dogs. Bloody aholes around where I live just let them romp all over & they form packs. :cuss: :fire:
 
I've noticed several homeowners insurance companies in CA ask what dogs you own and specifically exclude some breeds (Rotties and Dobies are common). So we're already there as far as insurance discrimination.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top