Soldier rescues child (Drill sergeant attacked by dog)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Battlespace

Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2004
Messages
310
Location
It depends on where I happen to be
Soldiers cannot keep handguns in their quarters. They can keep longguns, but even that is frowned on. If this guy would have done what most of us would have done and shot the dog, after rescuing the kid, he would now be in the confinement facility.

By SPC. IAN BOUDREAU/Turret Staff Writer

A Fort Knox drill sergeant became a Valentine's Day hero when he came to the rescue of a Pritchard Place child.

Staff Sgt. Anthony Etheridge, a drill sergeant with Company B, 2nd Battalion, 81st Armor Regt., said he was washing his car when he noticed a neighbor's large Rottweiler running loose in the area.

"I didn't think anything of it at first," he said. Etheridge initially thought the animal would stay close to home—until the dog began running toward a small boy playing in a grassy area in the neighborhood.

"The dog started to run toward the kid," Etheridge said. "It knocked him down and grabbed him by the pant leg."

The Rottweiler then started shaking the child as if he were a rag.

Etheridge had already started running toward the scene when the child got free. By the time Etheridge had arrived, the dog had knocked the child back down, this time grabbing hold of his shirt back and shaking him again.

"I grabbed the dog by the collar and separated them," Etheridge explained. "Then I held the kid over my head."

The dog began jumping and snapping at the child in Etheridge's hands. At around 150 pounds, the animal could look Etheridge in the eye when it reared up on its hind legs, said Capt. Ian Murray, Etheridge's company commander.

Etheridge said he made it over to a nearby fence and placed the child on the opposite side. That's when the dog became violent.

"I turned to see where the dog was," he said. "It lunged for me."

The dog bit down on his forearm, puncturing the skin. Etheridge tried fighting it off, but he was bitten again on the forearm and left leg before he was able to get over the fence himself, he said.

Etheridge convinced the boy to tell him where he lived, and took him back to his house. Etheridge now had to get back home himself n 200 yards away, with an angry dog still loose in the area.

"After I got the kid safe, then I had to get home," he said. "That was the scary part."

Fortunately, Etheridge made it home safely, and military police responded to the call. They apprehended the animal and transported Etheridge to Ireland Army Community Hospital, where he was treated for multiple bite wounds.

"I had four tooth holes in my forearm, and some cuts," he said. The worst injury was to his leg, where he suffered seven puncture wounds.

MPs issued a ticket to the dog's owner for failure to control a pet. The animal was taken to the Fort Knox veterinary clinic. The veterinary clinic was unavailable for comment on the dog's current status.

Owners are required to control their pets, and dogs are required to be on a leash unless contained in a secure, fenced area, according to Fort Knox Regulation 40-12.

The regulation also requires any animal that has bitten a person or another animal in "an unprovoked attack" to wear a muzzle while outdoors.

Etheridge is recovering from his wounds, and said he'd just begun light jogging on his injured leg last week.

Murray is recommending Etheridge for an award for his action.

"I'd do it again," Etheridge reflected. "I'd rather I got bitten than the kid. The biggest thing was that the dog shouldn't have gotten out."
 
Sounds like he did pretty good. I think if I was the man I would have grabbed a bat or something to hit the dog with.
 
MPs issued a ticket to the dog's owner for failure to control a pet.

That's *it*?! :barf:

That Sergeant should call an attorney and end-up owning the dog owner's house.

And the dog should be put down.

Sawdust
 
This sounds as if this happened on base. If so the dog owner has a lot more trouble to worry about than a ticket from the MP's. His/Her chain of command will be notified and may suffer rather harsh punishment. If the problem continues the least of their worries would be finding a place to live because they will be kicked off post. The worst of their problems would be an Article 15 for disobeying orders.
 
What I don't understand is why they can't keep a pistol with them...that doesn't make the slightest bit of sense to me...
 
"Do they still need the whole head of an animal to check for rabies?"

Yep, but if the dog is still clinically healthy 10 days after the incident, then it is not considered to be a Rabies incident.

If the dog dies or is put down within that 10 day period, then the head must be sent off to be tested.
 
Can it be that the Navy is actually more enlightened than the Army in this respect? Every base I've ever been stationed on allowed privately owned handguns in military family housing (government quarters).

Of course, technically, they must be registered, and I can only imagine the headaches and hassles that would ensue should anyone ever actually be forced to use a handgun in a defensive scenario in government quarters ...
 
I spent 21 years in the Army and was never prohibited from having any type of firearm in my family quarters, although I was never stationed at Ft Knox.
 
I was stationed at Ft. Knox 1980-83. I kept my handguns and my rifles and shotguns in my quarters.

All weapons had to be recorded on a special card with the MPs, but there was no limitation to what I could own. (I still have my copy of those cards to this day.)

Prior to shipping out to Korea I flew the family home, and moved into the barracks for about a week while I cleaned the quarters and cleared the post. I needed to check all my weapons into the arms room during that time, but the day that I left I checked them all out, put them in my trunk, and made the long drive from Ft. Knox to El Paso, TX.
 
Any animal that attacks a human without provocation should be put down. It's that simple. No if's, ands or buts.

Attack=physical contact which results in injury.
 
The regulation also requires any animal that has bitten a person or another animal in "an unprovoked attack" to wear a muzzle while outdoors.
well anywhere outside a base, and that dog would have been killed. at least up here anyways.
 
I was stationed at Ft. Knox 1980-83. I kept my handguns and my rifles and shotguns in

Sadly that is not the case anymore at military bases. Long guns are still okay in quarters, but not handguns. You know they will just jump out there and shoot someone if they are kept in quarters.
 
Here...

it seems to be okay to keep any type of legal firearms in military housing, on or off base.

I am part of the Schofield Rod and Gun club (wife is retired Navy) and regularly shoot at and act as range safety officer at the on-base range.

We have quite a few active military members who live in base housing (both actually on bases such as Schofield and in off-base military housing areas). All seem to be able to keep their pistols at home.

There is a process you have to go through at the same office that issues car decals. You bring in your state registration forms and spend a few minutes filling out these yellow index cards and letting the clerk enter the info into a computer. It's the same paperwork I had to fill out in order to bring my guns on base to shoot. Not a big deal.

Since most of my wife's career we spent living in other countries, our firearms stayed in storage until she retired and we semi-settled here. It seems to me though that the times we lived in on-base housing in those areas we signed forms stating that any type of firearm was prohibited in base housing. I could be mis-remembering though.

migoi
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top