AR15 in 6.5Grendel Questions (Penetration, Perf at Range, AA, Recoil)

Status
Not open for further replies.

roo_ster

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2003
Messages
3,352
Location
USA
Looking for a rifle for my relatively small wife and very small daughter to hunt hogs, deer, and other medium sized big game.

QUESTIONS


1. Is there a good penetrating factory hunting load with something like a Nosler Partition?
My main 6.5Grendel worry is the lack of a good penetrating hunting load to be had in factory ammo, like a Nosler Partition. My wife's favored .243Win load is a 100gr partition (Federal) and so far it has made a full pass-through on every critter shot, while doing good damage along the way through bone and softer tissue. Limited 6.5G case capacity seems to limit the utility of the monometallic bullets like the Barnes, Hornady GMX, etc., so little love there.

2. Are the modest 6.5Grendel velocities (assume 16" bbl) enough to get the various factory hunting loads to perform (terminally) at longer reasonable hunting ranges (say 300 yards, max)?
.243Win loses a lot of velocity in shorter bbls and factory 100gr pills out of the Ruger Am Compact 18" bbl are moving ~2600fps ( http://rifleshooter.com/2016/04/243-winchester-effect-of-barrel-length-on-velocity/). Alexander arms claims ~2450fps from a 16" bbl with 120-129gr loadings (http://alexanderarms.com/images/pdfs/grendel_ballistics.pdf). Going from .243Win to 6.5Grendel does not seem like not too much of a loss, performance wise, in the bbl lengths under consideration. 6.5G has less velocity, but more weight in popular hunting loads. But I have no experience with 6.5G as I have with .243Win.

3. Alexander Arms: Good quality?
Not sure I want to build my first 6.5Grendel upper, so am considering the AA lightweight 16" bbl upper (http://www.shopalexanderarms.com/Uppers-6_5_Grendel_Incursion_Complete_Upper_Assembly.html).

4. Subjective Recoil?
I assume it is less than a .243Win from a bolt gun, assuming same rifle weight. My wife can manage .243Win recoil and still put the bullet where it needs to go.


BACKGROUND

Wife is 5' nothing, 100lbs if you stuff rocks in her pockets. She can shoot a Ruger American Compact in .243Win (6lbs, 18"bbl, 37" OAL, 12.5" LOP) when she uses a PAST recoil shield. Problem is, she is heavily left eye dominant, so shoots lefty...and that rifle only comes righty. So follow-up shots are a slow prospect, even without a shooting sling. Lefty bolt guns with 12.5LOP and 6lbs or less in .243Win-ish chamberings are limited to the Browning X-bolt Micro-Midas ($800-ish). Or a custom job (very expensive).

About the only centerfire rifle that fits my daughter (10YO, tiny for age) is an AR15 with 6-position collapsible stock, collapsed all the way. She can use that with a red dot and get on target. Daughter still too small for a compact short action bolt gun with a 12.5" LOP. Daughter can shoot a Crickett all day long.

AR15 is darned lefty-friendly, so wife will be able to shoot it easily, make a follow up shot quickly enough to count, use a proper shooting sling. It can be built at 6lbs or less (before optics) & 37" or less OAL (with 16" bbl). I own several AR15 lowers, so I have my eyeball on the Alexander Arms 16" lightweight upper (http://www.shopalexanderarms.com/Uppers-6_5_Grendel_Incursion_Complete_Upper_Assembly.html at $685). AA makes a basic lightweight rifle with that upper that comes in at 5.9lbs.

======================================================

[FTR, the Ruger American Compact is a whole lot of rifle for the money. My wife's is accurate with most of the 8 or so factory loads I tested. (The Federal factory load with the 100gr Nosler Partition was not the most accurate, but it was good and had the Partition.) Main downside of the Ruger Am Compact is the noodly forearm. It is not stiff enough and can cause flyers. The bbl is free float--until you rest the forearm on a sandbag out toward hte end or use a shooting sling. My son also shoots it well and I intend it to be his gun. I will stiffen up the forearm with carbon fiber shafts and epoxy or bedding compound. And slap on a couple picatinny rails to mount gun lights for hunting hogs at night. Of course, I am partial to Mauser actions and shoot a CZ550 my own self, but that Ruger American showed me inexpensive rifles can shoot.]

 
I have several Grendels. I believe it's a fine cartridge. Hornady reportedly has several good factory loads for the Grendel so you might want to check their options. I reload so I'm not an expert there.

In my case I'd not hesitate to shoot southern deer at 250 yards. Past that, I'd likely choose another rifle, but that's just me. I've read of many people that comfortably hunt at distances of 300 yards or more.

Recoil is considerably less than the 243's I've shot.

I have no experience with Alexander Arms but they have a good reputation.

I have a 22" and 24" barrel. BTW you may want to visit the 65grendel website. You'll get very good information there particarly on hunting loads.
 
At the velocity attainable with the grendel any of the regular hunting bullets will perform quite well. I shoot 123 amax from mine and blow thru sheep and goats, pigs stop the bullets but usually on the other side. My guns a 20" pencil barrel, light weight build with a Nikon p223 scope on it...even attached to my kinda heffty lower it weighs just over 8lbs loaded. Recoils much reduced from a .243

AA builds good stuff. Ive never owned one but ive used a few now, they have all felt tight, and worked perfectly, they guys that own them are very happy.
 
Last edited:
I've owned 3 grendels personally, and built around 2 dozen of them for customers. I probably wouldn't go less than 20" in a Grendel, just no reason to do so, and you do give up quite a bit of opportunity.

There are LOTS of bullets on the market which will penetrate well in the Grendel, and the low velocities (relatively low) tend to help in that area, and bullets which might shed a lot of weight at ~3000fps Impact velocities do well out of the Grendel. Even with tipped bullets, penetration has always been good for me.

Are you reloading, or factory only? If you're a reloader, take a look at the 6-6.8 and see if it tickles your fancy.
 
I really wanted to build a 6.5 Grendel six-seven years ago. This was when, as far as I could research, everything 6.5 Grendel was property of Alexander Arms and accordingly pricy. I did some research, watched a guy shoot one during a three-gun match, (it jammed, so bad he asked to start over with another rifle), and after the match, after he had time the clear the rifle, asked to shoot it. I thought it was a great cartridge, just not for an AR-15 receiver. I ended up going with the 6.8SPC for my build. Anyway.....

I've heard many of the "issues" associated with the 6.5 Grendel have been resolved. I'd still like one. Unless....

Have you thought about something like a .260 Rem on an AR-10 receiver?
 
I've been shooting a Grendel for a couple of years now, I don't know of any "issues" at all with them. Mines an AA with 24" barrel, so I can't really discuss the shorter barrels. Mine does great on paper out to 600 yards, but it's no 243 Winny, I have one of those also in a Savage 12 with 28" barrel for F class shooting, and the .243 is a lot more gun than the Grendel. I've limited all of my game shots to around 200 yards, and used the SST load on various deer and pigs with no issue.
 
Problem is, she is heavily left eye dominant, so shoots lefty...and that rifle only comes righty. So follow-up shots are a slow prospect, even without a shooting sling. Lefty bolt guns with 12.5LOP and 6lbs or less in .243Win-ish chamberings are limited to the Browning X-bolt Micro-Midas ($800-ish). Or a custom job (very expensive).


Have you looked at the Savage Axis, left handed, youth model in .243? That is right around 6 pounds. Don't know the LOP, but being a youth model it might be short enough. Reasonably priced.

Remington has a left handed model of their 700 SPS in a youth length. That might be worth a look.

Thompson Center has a lefty in .243 under their Dimension line.

Tikka T3 Hunter is available in .243 and left handed.

Your smith ought to be able to get you the LOP you need when installing a good recoil pad.

Too bad CZ does not have something that fits your needs.


.
 
Is your daughter right handed? If so that does make a good argument for the AR as they are easier to use interchangeably.
 
I have a decent share of uppers in several calibers. I hunted with most of them.
With small calibers you want to compensate grain and modest sectional density with speed.
The Grendel/LBC will do great with 90-100 grains but on the slow side with 120gr+.

We already have a large assortment of slow for caliber pistol-made-rifle calibers and we want to stay away from that.

I think the 6.5 is a better for long range overall with a long barrel but then at the ranges it really shines
it doesn't have the momentum to tackle game we want to bring to the table.
Also I was never able to replicate the speeds advertised by B.Alexander even with the long barrels
and w/o running into flat primers and stretched cases. I had chats with him and ended up updating
the tables but still. In any case I do not like to reload hot all the time unless for hunting with more punch
given accuracy is still acceptable.
I would consider it still adequate for most uses though but you might look into a longer barrel
like others suggested.
After the speed issues that was the reason I got a couple of 6.5BRs for the AR15 but those require reloading.
Now when I hunt with the AR15 I almost exclusively hunt wiht a 35 caliber cat I made that puts 200gr
accubond on the shoulders but again this is another specialty development and reloading is needed.

The other thing is to perhaps consider the nice 6.8 where the assortment of light, practice and premium
hunting bullets is more plentiful. I think you have to think about less SD and more speed to assure faster kills
that do not rely so much on wounding potential and more in shock. Speed on the target is key and with
these small calibers where we cannot match grain to game weight by the book we need to be smart and use
premium bullets and careful angles and placement to anchor the animals.
The 6.8 SPC II with a light 18" barrel will propel the amazing 95gr TTSX to 2850fps+. 85gr TSX clock 3000fps
from the same barrels. All proven deer and hog smashers.
While the grain is a tad less the added frontal section and speed pays off. You also get the assurance of
stronger bolts and trouble free feeding by design. Always keep distances real and stay away from the
online fantasy preaching impossible kills for these nice yet limited calibers. We owe it to the animals.

So it is a hard call if you already tried the 6.5 that is a beautiful round. But I would try others if you
can.

Otherwise for more serious role or medium, medium to heavy game that is when you should look
into the 308, 7/08, 338 etc.. and therefore more recoil and weight.
But there are super light systems now and a 308w with a 130gr TTSX hits like a 270 but with less recoil.
7mm/08 will send the 120gr ttsx and bonded like lighting bolts.
Of course it will not be a confortable shooter for petite / light weight people.

I think in terms of recoil either one of the AR15 will be pretty acceptable even for the youngest and wife.
My daughter who is 15 shoots all the calibers w/o problems including the 458 and 35 with 225gr bullets.
I know it is not as pleasant but also not something uncontrollable due to the recoil action of these
auto-loaders. She double taps with the 6.8 and 223 like it is nothing.
 
Thank you for your replies, rayatphonix, LoonWulf, varminterror, mokin, browningguy, Acera, 1stmarine.

ryatphonix
So, looks like Hornady is the largest backer WRT factory ammo. 300 yards was the extreme, probably the absolute farthest I'd be comfy shooting given good conditions, a really good rest, a dinner-plate sized target, and the right rifle. I think I will cross-post on the 6.5 Grendel website.

LoonWulf
Nice to know about the hunting bullets' performance and about AA's build quality. Hogs are the likeliest prey. 8lbs would be a show stopper. Wife's rifle needs to be around & about 6lbs, 37" OAL, 12.5" LOP.

varminterror
The reason to go shorter than a 20" bbl in an AR is to keep OAL at 37" or less for a shorter/smaller shooter. I know lotsa folk shoot 6.5G long range, but this is a 300m or less vs medium sized big game rig. Not sure 6.5G is up to that with a 16" bbl. Is that your meaning? I do not reload at present, but have in the past. Probably will in the future. In any case, I do not want a reloading-only chambering.

mokin
.260rem or 6.5creedmoore in an AR10 would be simply nifty...for me. But not my wife. Lightest AR10s are more than 7.5lbs that I saw.

browningguy
So, 200 yard limit and the Hornady SST.

Acera
I had forgotten the Savage Axis Youth/Compact in .243Win. Savage says it is 6.2lbs, 40" OAL, LOP unknown. That is close, real close to what she has now but lefty. Will have to email Savage and ask. Big thanks for the tip. Rem 700 SPS compact LH is too heavy at 7lbs. Tikkas are over 6.5lbs & OAL of 40+", I did not see any LH TC rifles and their compact RH models are 6.75+lbs. I would pay good money for a CZ550 LH compact, but they don't exist. I love my CZ550 AmSaf in .375H&H. Will eat out the center of a bull at 200 yards with the cheapest Remington Express 270gr soft points. Aftermarket recoil pads on hollow synthetic stocks are a goat rodeo. BTDT with a 'smith. Should have done it myself.

LoonWulf
Yep, daughter is right handed and shoots righty. Sharing a rifle between a right and lefty does point in the direction of AR. Given I have four shooters in the family and I'm not made of money, I tend to mount my Leupold scopes in QRW rings and swap them about the rifles, depending on who is shooting what. Got one VX-I that has been on a .243win, .30-06, and now on a Ruger 10/22 in the last year.

1stmarine
Yep, I recall when 6.5G hit the ground some 110 years back, it seemed more punchy than it does these days. The objective metrics on the rifle are 6lbs, 12.5LOP (adjustable down, if possible), 37" OAL, and potent enough to reasonably take medium sized game at 200+ yards. Oh, and with a small, recoil-sensitive shooter. Not easy to fit the bill. Daughter might end up with a lightweight AR15 in 5.56. Those are easy enough to build to the aforementioned requirements and with a 1:7 twist bbl and a 70-80gr premium bullet can be used for CNS shots on hogs.


Y'all surely have given me something to think about.
 
"My main 6.5Grendel worry is the lack of a good penetrating hunting load to be had in factory ammo"
Doesn't Grendel generally have a higher sectional density than even 308? Should have no problems penetrating anything you're likely to shoot at, so long as a sturdy hunting bullet is used.

"The 6.8 SPC II with a light 18" barrel will propel the amazing 95gr TTSX to 2850fps+. 85gr TSX clock 3000fps
from the same barrels. All proven deer and hog smashers.
While the grain is a tad less the added frontal section and speed pays off."
As you said, there are different kinds of wounding mechanisms (energy transfer vs. pure pentration & bullet gymastics). Different strokes for different folks, and it doesn't really matter here since both Grendel and SPC will equally nail anything approximately deer/man/hog sized with a decent shot (that being the whole point of these rounds). I will simply say, that if one happens to be the type who believes in momentum/projectile mass being an important factor for their needs, that the standard 123gr Hornady 6.5 bullet sends 29.5% more lead down range, at 10% less speed, and 8.6% less frontal area. The speed difference will diminish rapidly with distance, due to the 6.5 bullet's "very low drag" profile (the 6.8's low density is a dual-edged sword; chamber pressure speeds it up fast, but it slows down & drifts just as quickly against wind resistance --but also tissue, resulting in more efficient energy transfer to the target)

TCB

PS, Roo's signature line is awesome; haven't seen that Orwell quote before, but like all of them, it is accurate & biting
 
Last edited:
A 16" Grendel would have a boatload of blast. Killing deer to 300yrds isn't asking much, so I'd be certain a Grendel would manage it, but I'd also be hard pressed to recommend anything below 20" for it.
 
I know this isn't to your point, but CDNN has the Ruger American in Left handed SS in .243 for $300. That's got to be cheaper than a Grendel upper.
 
Howa also now offers a short-length bolt action in Grendel that is affordable
 
If you obtain a Grendel in an optimal barrel length of 20" it will be harder to get the weight down to 6 pounds. Barrels are part of the equation. A 6.8 at 16" will share the same difficulty. The 6 pound line in the sand is going to require a pencil barrel, no front sight base, a MFT Minimalist type stock, and a reflex type optic if at all.

I have a 16" 6.8 with cheap reflex, Apex Gator grip handguard and MInimalist stock on an ARP recon profile barrel and it weight 6.5 pounds. I then built an AR pistol with FSB and snap in B5 handguards, nothing on the buffer tube, it weighs 5.5 pounds. A goal of 6 pounds finished will require another level of expense to achieve. Considering the platform was successful in trimming weight in a combat rifle from the traditional 12+ of the Garand/M14, it's plenty light enough. Very few high dollar mountain rifles for sheep used in the Rockies approach that weight.

Less weight equals more recoil, and the alternative cartridges are loaded much hotter than 5.56. 6.8 achieves a 50% increase in foot pounds of force out to 300 yards, with the Grendel holding out further.

Your choice on which cartridge. The weight issue, however, will probably require a compromise and the final result ready to hunt will tip 7 pounds. The weights I quoted were without magazine and a ten round mag loaded will add it's poundage.
 
Tirod
6lbs is without optics and unloaded and no other doo-dads. So, a challenge, but not unheard of. Most entry-level M4geries come in at around 6.5-6.75lbs. All rifle/uppers that I have considered are as you describe: pencil/ULW bbl, gas block but no front sight. Her 6lb Ruger American Compact is topped with a Leupold VX-1 2-7x that weighs 10oz. A similar sort of optic will go on this prospective rifle, or maybe one of those 1-4x deals with an illuminated reticle from Burris. For a backup sight I am thinking one of those sub-$100 Bushnell red dot reflex sights, already sighted in but packed off the rifle.

KCJ
That is a great deal, but the rifle is too big for a small gal in LOP and OAL, though weight is close. Almost all non-youth, non-compact factory rifles are too big for youth and smaller gals. I would end up paying a smith to lop off 4" of bbl, and a few inches of buttstock...and then installing a recoil pad. Weight would be at or below 6lbs, though.

barnbwt
If I go bolt action, I will go .243Win, .260Rem, or 6.5Creedmoor. 6.5Grendel is nifty, but is limited by the AR15 chassis.

 
As you said, there are different kinds of wounding mechanisms (energy transfer vs. pure pentration & bullet gymastics). Different strokes for different folks, and it doesn't really matter here since both Grendel and SPC will equally nail anything approximately deer/man/hog sized with a decent shot (that being the whole point of these rounds). I will simply say, that if one happens to be the type who believes in momentum/projectile mass being an important factor for their needs, that the standard 123gr Hornady 6.5 bullet sends 29.5% more lead down range, at 10% less speed, and 8.6% less frontal area. The speed difference will diminish rapidly with distance, due to the 6.5 bullet's "very low drag" profile (the 6.8's low density is a dual-edged sword; chamber pressure speeds it up fast, but it slows down & drifts just as quickly against wind resistance --but also tissue, resulting in more efficient energy transfer to the target)
You are right, when you put things on the balance the differences for wounding potential seem negligible.
But IMO for the soft skin medium game like white tail and also hogs it seems that stout fast moving bullets with high striking speed can make a difference.
I don't think neither casing presents a penetration problem for this type of hunting so we can trade a bit of sectional density for speed
so we can stay in that magic threshold above 2400-2200fps striking speed where fast activation, hydrostatic shock is more prominent and we don't
have to rely so much on just wounding / bleeding out and this way assure fast ethical kills. I am also saying because of the amazing bullet assortment
for hunting in the 80-120gr in the 270 bore vs. 6.5 that is more limited.
With all that said I would tackle white tail with either one without doubt but always keeping ranges modest due to the small platform and calibers.
With larger game I would choose more sectional density but most likely will go to another specialty casing and perhaps rifle to assure high striking speed
too this way we can get the most efficiency from the activation of the bullets upon impact.
I don't have anything against slower softer fragmentation bullets but they are hard to predict and even yield slow kills. I think when one gets to 7mm or 30 caliber
and 168gr and above there is more potential but also this should be approached with careful consideration matching bullets to body weight and
keeping distances in mind.
This might seem exaggerating but I put great deal of time planning. Fast kills are a concern to me. I just hate to see animals suffer unnecessarily.
Sorry for diverting a bit from the original purpose. Perhaps this is subject for another thread.
 
Lots of bullets out there for 6.5 from sub-100gr to the mid-100s. Like I said, very simlar to 6.8, Grendel shooters just tend to fixate on the heavy/long bullets for range while 6.8 is a favorite of SBRs, exaggerating the minor difference between them (i.e they complement rather than directly compete for the same roles, even though both are capable of the same job)

I mostly like Grendel since it fits in RPD links ;)
 
Roo_ster, maybe take a close look at scope weights. Ive found the 1-4 "tactical" types to often be a bit heavier, than the 1-4/2-7 hunting scopes. Not familiar with the burris so i dont know if that applies.

Perhaps your in the arena where you need to do your own AR build. If you choose the lightest options for lower components, a milled smooth upper, and a light handguard and gas block, you can probably be in the 6-6.5# range with a 20" light weight barrel barrel (id go sans muzzle device) in either grendel or spc type round. I dont have an actual weight on my upper but its pretty light, the scope I have on it weights in at over a pound tho. Ill grab a weight when i get home.

actually i have a picture of mine.....cant see the upper very well tho.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20161008_185727962.jpg
    IMG_20161008_185727962.jpg
    109.8 KB · Views: 4
Last edited:
Just weighted the upper and scope. If i swaped for a lighter scope and mount combo, and took off the steel under rail and aluminum muzzle shroud could probably shave 1/4lb (and 3") or so. I just break 2500 fps with a 123 amax from this 20" barrel which is plenty fast enough.
IMG_20161112_070907905.jpg


As you can see i dont have a particularly light lower

IMG_20161112_070931715.jpg
 
Loonwulf
Good hint regarding those 1-4x ar scopes. The one i am interested in run around a pound. Think i will stick with a nice leupold 2-7x vm1 or vm2.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top