Are 44 Revolvers Dying?

Read an article over the weekend by John Taffin. He quoted another, I'll paraphrase, "revolvers are obsolete, there is no point in learning to shoot one".

Author and Olympic gold medal shooter Walter Winans wrote that.......................in 1919. Hmmmm..... :scrutiny:
 
Maybe, but as the Brenda Holloway classic goes, "Every Little Bit Hurts". The .44 Magnum- great as it is- started losing market share the minute that people started producing and buying big game handguns in other calibers.
Same could be said of the .30-06, nobody's predicting its demise.
 
Maybe, but as the Brenda Holloway classic goes, "Every Little Bit Hurts". The .44 Magnum- great as it is- started losing market share the minute that people started producing and buying big game handguns in other calibers.
The 357 S&W Magnum was introduced in 1935. The 44 Remington Magnum was introduced 20 years later. It has not killed off the smaller magnum.

Kevin
 
Not for me.
I'm pretty partial to my one .44 Spl Taurus.
But to be honest, I'm a bit more partial to my .45LC S&W revolvers....
 
Last month, the 4th month of the year, was my 44th birthday, so I celebrated by buying my 4th .44. And since its so pretty, I don't mind posting another pic of it.
If the .44 is dying, its certainly lively for a soon-to-be corpse.

index.php
 
Convenient for you to leave out what I said later in that post. The point I made right after was not everyone is buying guns simply for fun or sport and the smaller, popular, more affordable calibers are often a better choice for more people regardless of their performance against big bears and moose because they're what people own and shoot the most. What good is that one or two shots of .44 that you miss with vs the .357 or 10mm you hit with?

You can rage against that all you want and tell those people to just stay home in their nice, safe, cozy homes or indoor shooting ranges and leave hiking trails for "real men", but that's just the facts of what people are doing.

If the .44 revolver was not declining we'd be seeing a lot more of them in various flavors hitting the market. Instead what we've seen over the years is .44 production being trimmed down. Ruger brought out a GP100 in .44 Special and that lasted a year or two before it went from standard catalogue item to a distributor exclusive, the standard Blackhawk .44 Special has been dropped, we've seen Taurus drop all their .44 Specials.

Colt brought back the Anaconda, but apart from collectors they're going to find a hard time getting people to pay $1400 for one.

The .44 revolver is declining in popularity, more so than .38/.357, 9mm, and .45 revolvers.
The .44 revolver may be declining in popularity, but so what? As long as ammo and/or components are available I, for one, will continue to shoot 'em even if only at paper targets.
 
The .44 revolver may be declining in popularity, but so what? As long as ammo and/or components are available I, for one, will continue to shoot 'em even if only at paper targets.
I'm not criticizing anyone for choosing to buy a .44 revolver, they're still good guns. I question their usefulness and their practicality as I see their potential as limited, enough so that I consider other caliber revolvers better for most people.

The fact is .44 owners are a minority of gun owners, even revolver owners. Owners of a .44 may as well buy more, first time owners would be advised to carefully consider if a .44 is the best choice for them.
 
The 357 S&W Magnum was introduced in 1935. The 44 Remington Magnum was introduced 20 years later. It has not killed off the smaller magnum.

Kevin
Heck, there have been more smaller caliber magnums introduced since the .44 Mag debuted than there have been larger ones.
 
I'm not criticizing anyone for choosing to buy a .44 revolver, they're still good guns. I question their usefulness and their practicality as I see their potential as limited, enough so that I consider other caliber revolvers better for most people.

The fact is .44 owners are a minority of gun owners, even revolver owners. Owners of a .44 may as well buy more, first time owners would be advised to carefully consider if a .44 is the best choice for them.
What are you smoking? The .357 is typically considered the most versatile handgun cartridge extant. While the .44Mag will do everything it will do and much, much more. Between it and its patriarch the .44 Special, it fits into guns as small as the Charter Arms Pug, up to and including heavy duty hunting handguns that have taken all of the African Big Six.
 
What are you smoking? The .357 is typically considered the most versatile handgun cartridge extant. While the .44Mag will do everything it will do and much, much more. Between it and its patriarch the .44 Special, it fits into guns as small as the Charter Arms Pug, up to and including heavy duty hunting handguns that have taken all of the African Big Six.
Cuz when I'm CC'ing a Smith 69 Combat Magnum I'm strolling along the African Continent going shopping. Never know when a water buffalo might attack.
 
You are quite close, but as a hunting round, or defense from nasty 4 legged creatures in lower 48, IMO 45 Colt has the edge over 44 (either hotter 44 Special or milder 44 Magnum, talking about 250-265 grains at 1100 fps).

45 is tad bigger caliber, it could throw slightly heavier bullet at the same velocity and all that at the same pressure. Yes, recoil is also bit up, but still far easier on hands than full power 44 Magnum.

If our pistolero shoots a lot, and want to preserve his hands and arms for very old age, or arthritis is the issue, but he still wants something formidable, 41 Magnum is the answer, especially in Ruger Bisley. For casual shooting and defense from two legged predators, 180-220 grains at 1100 will do it. For hunting or 4 legged predators, 270 grains at 1100-1200 fps is all it's needed, see more here https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/revolver-for-handgun-hunting-another-view.903836/ .

Just to make it clear, this is from the guy who, after lengthy search, just purchased a nice 6" Security Six, until recently had three 44 Magnum revolvers, 7.5" Redhawk (gone now) and two Bisley-s, one 5'5", another 7.5". But, as soon as I put my hand on stainless 45 Colt Bisley, and 7.5" 41 Magnum Bisley, 7.5" Bisley in 44 Magnum will be also gone. In other words, I cannot imagine how handgun shooter could be without, at least, one nice revolver in 357 Magnum and one in 44 Magnum.
Let's hear it for the .41 Mag!
 
There’s an article in the most recent Handloader magazine titled: Are 44 Revolvers Dying?

It goes thru the list of 44 caliber cartridges for wheelguns: 44-40 WCF, 44 Russian, 44 Spl, and 44 Magnum. After reviewing the guns chambered for these rounds, it asks:

The article concludes:

Is he right? Or is this far too pessimistic? Ruger did recently bring back the 44 Mag Marlin levergun.
What you read is a SILLY magazine article written to create contrivousy(sp?).........It's BS........44's area popular as ever..............Believe nothing you read and only 1/2 of what you see.
 
The point wasn't that Winans could have been right, in some alternate universe without folks like Elmer Keith, John Lachuk, The .44 Associates, Phil Sharpe, Doug Wesson, Al Georg and all those that followed. He wasn't right, not even close. I don't even think he was remotely right in the context in which he wrote it but I don't delve into fantasy. The point is that seemingly qualified "experts" have been predicting the demise of this or that for years and years. Yet here we are, still talking about it 105yrs later, in such a time where the finest revolvers ever made are presently being produced, while I decide if I want to go ahead and get the stainless .44Magnum Anaconda or wait for a blued one.
 
Back
Top